A 50-year-old man was referred for subacute intracranial hypertension. MRI revealed a well-circumscribed lesion in the posterior fossa that was hypointense on T1-weighted imaging and hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging (figure 1, A and E). Cerebral blood volume map and sequential postcontrast T1-weighted images showed progressive increase in the homogeneity of the contrast enhancement, indicating that the lesion had low but substantial flow (figure 1, B–D). Digital subtraction angiography showed a vascular lesion with a central to peripheral pattern of vascularity and absence of early venous return (figure 1, F–H). The lesion was resected. Pathologic examination revealed a capillary-venous malformation (figure 2).1,2 This case highlights that MRI can identify low flow in vascular malformations.
T1-weighted imaging (A) and T2-weighted imaging (E). Central high perfusion on the cerebral blood volume map (dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion) (B), progressive enhancement on T1-weighted imaging immediately after injection (C), and 5 minutes later (D). Progressive vascular filling on digital subtraction angiography: arterial phase (F), intermediate phase (G), and late phase (H).
Paraffin-embedded section stained with hematoxylin & eosin–Safran shows large blood vessels with thin walls. Absence of proliferating cells; no expression of GLUT1. This can be defined as capillary-venous malformation according to the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies classification system.
Footnotes
Author contributions: Dr. Heck: design and conceptualization of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting and revising the manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Krainik: revising the manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Boubagra: analysis and interpretation of the data. Dr. Tahon: analysis and interpretation of the data. Dr. Attye: revising the manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Le Bas: revising the manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Boutonnat: analysis and interpretation of the data. Sylvie Grand: design and conceptualization of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting and revising the manuscript for intellectual content.
Study funding: No targeted funding reported.
Disclosure: The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.
- © 2014 American Academy of Neurology
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
