Share

November 11, 2014; 83 (20) ArticleOpen Access

CD49d antisense drug ATL1102 reduces disease activity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS

Volker Limmroth, Frederik Barkhof, Nuket Desem, Mark P. Diamond, George Tachas, For the ATL1102 Study Group
First published September 19, 2014, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000926
Full PDF
Citation
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
2312

Share

This article has a correction. Please see:

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ATL1102, an antisense oligonucleotide that selectively targets the RNA for human CD49d, the α subunit of very late antigen 4, in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Methods: In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized phase II trial, 77 patients with RRMS were treated with 200 mg of ATL1102 subcutaneously injected 3 times in the first week and twice weekly for 7 weeks or placebo and monitored for a further 8 weeks. MRI scans were taken at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. The primary endpoint was the cumulative number of new active lesions (either new gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions or nonenhancing new or enlarging T2 lesions) at weeks 4, 8, and 12.

Results: A total of 72 patients completed the study and 74 intention-to-treat patients were assessed. ATL1102 significantly reduced the cumulative number of new active lesions by 54.4% compared to placebo (mean 3.0 [SD 6.12] vs 6.2 [9.89], p = 0.01). The cumulative number of new gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions was reduced by 67.9% compared to placebo (p = 0.002). Treatment-emergent adverse events included mild to moderate injection site erythema and decrease in platelet counts that returned to within the normal range after dosing.

Conclusions: In patients with RRMS, ATL1102 significantly reduced disease activity after 8 weeks of treatment and was generally well-tolerated. This trial provides evidence for the first time that antisense oligonucleotides may be used as a therapeutic approach in neuroimmunologic disorders.

Classification: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with RRMS, the antisense oligonucleotide ATL1102 reduces the number of new active head MRI lesions.

GLOSSARY

ALAT=
alanine aminotransferase;
CI=
confidence interval;
EDSS=
Expanded Disability Status Scale;
Gd=
gadolinium;
ITT=
intention-to-treat;
MS=
multiple sclerosis;
PML=
progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy;
PP=
per-protocol;
RRMS=
relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis;
SC=
subcutaneously;
TEAE=
treatment-emergent adverse event;
VLA-4=
very late antigen 4

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is an immune-mediated disease that damages the myelin in CNS, causing neurologic impairment and frequently severe disability.1 Currently most treatments act as immunosuppressors or immunomodulators. The monoclonal antibody natalizumab that targets the adhesion molecule very late antigen 4 (VLA-4), thought to interfere with the transmigration of leukocytes into the CNS, significantly reduces brain lesions,2 relapse frequency, and the progression of disability in patients with RRMS.3 Natalizumab, however, can cause progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy4 with a high lethality, which has impacted on its use.

ATL1102 is a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide to CD49d RNA, the α chain of VLA-4. ATL1102 binds CD49d RNA by Watson-Crick base pairing and recruits intracellular RNase H leading to degradation of the RNA strand of the RNA:DNA duplex.5,6 ATL1102 selectively reduces CD49d RNA and VLA-4 expression in primary human cells and in several human cell lines and inhibits cell adhesion. ATL1102 is rapidly cleared from the blood after administration and distributes to tissues including lymphoid organs that contain lymphocytes that express VLA-4. The aim of this proof-of-concept trial was to evaluate whether ATL1102 treatment was able to reduce brain lesion activity and to determine its safety profile in patients with RRMS.

METHODS

ATL1102.

ATL1102 is a single-stranded second-generation antisense oligonucleotide designed to hybridize to the 3′-untranslated region of human CD49d RNA. ATL1102 is 20 bases in length, with a molecular weight of 7230 Da. It is the 19-sodium salt of a 3′→5′ phosphorothioate oligonucleotide 20-mer with a 3-9-8, 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) gapmer design to support an RNase H antisense mechanism of action. The ATL1102 sequence is 5′-MeCMeUG AGT MeCTG TTT MeUMeCMeC AMeUMeU MeCMeU–3′, with the first 3 and last 8 bases 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) modified and cytosine and uracil bases 5′methylated (Me).

Study protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents.

The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry as trial number ACTRN12608000226303. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before initiating study-related procedures. The conduct of the trial was approved by each country's regulatory authority and independent ethics committees of each participating center.

Trial design.

This phase II trial in patients with RRMS was conducted as a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The study comprised 3 periods as follows:

  1. 2-week screening period (visit V1, day −14 to 0), during which 95 patients were screened;

  2. 8-week treatment period involving a 1-week induction phase (visit V2, day 1; visit V3, day 2) where 200 mg of ATL1102 was administered on days 1, 4, and 7 followed by a 7-week maintenance phase (visit V4, day 14; V5, day 28; V6, day 56) with 2 doses of 200 mg ATL1102 administered weekly on days 4 and 7; and an

  3. 8-week follow-up period (visits V7, day 84; V8, day 112).

At visit V2, 77 eligible patients were randomly allocated in a ratio of approximately 1:1 to either the ATL1102 group (n = 36) or placebo group (n = 41) as outlined in appendix e-1 on the Neurology® Web site at Neurology.org. Study medication was administered subcutaneously (SC) by the investigator or the patient, blinded to treatment assignment. Each dose of ATL1102 contained 200 mg of ATL1102 in water for injection adjusted to pH7.4 and was administered as 2 100-mg SC injections.

Patient inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Male and female patients were eligible for inclusion in the study if they were aged 18–55 years and had RRMS; at least 9 T2 lesions or at least 4 T2 lesions if one was gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing, with at least one relapse in the previous 12 months, but no relapses in the previous 4 weeks; and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score 0–6.0. For patients previously treated with immunosuppressive drugs or immunomodulating drugs, there was a 6- or 2-month prestudy washout period, respectively.

Patients were excluded if they were HIV-positive or had detectable levels of JC virus in the blood as measured by quantitative PCR.

Detailed eligibility criteria are available on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12608000226303.

MRI of T1 and T2 lesions.

MRI sites were selected based on successful performance of a dummy run and all in-study scans were subjected to a quality control procedure at the Image Analysis Centre in Amsterdam for central blinded assessment. The MRI protocol included T2-weighted images and T1-weighted images before and after standard-dose Gd. Five MRI scans were performed per patient and were taken at baseline (between day -14 and -7), week 4 (after 9 doses), week 8 (after 17 doses), week 12, and week 16. In case of relapse, an additional MRI scan was performed.

The following MRI efficacy assessment was done by an experienced reader blinded to treatment allocation:

  • Number of new T1 Gd-enhancing lesions indicating blood–brain barrier disruption

  • Number of new/enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions

  • Total volume of enhancing lesions

Scans were also reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) independently of the team assessing the scans for efficacy.

Efficacy assessments.

The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate whether ATL1102 treatment was able to reduce brain lesion activity compared to placebo in patients with RRMS and Class I evidence is provided. The primary efficacy endpoint was the cumulative number of new active lesions (either new T1 Gd lesions or nonenhancing, new, or enlarging T2 lesions) on MRIs at weeks 4, 8, and 12 in ATL1102 compared to placebo-treated patients.

A secondary efficacy endpoint was the cumulative volume of all T1 Gd lesions on MRIs at weeks 4, 8, and 12 in the ATL1102 compared to placebo-treated patients.

Additional assessments included the cumulative number of T1 Gd lesions on MRIs taken at weeks 4, 8, and 12, and in a post hoc analysis, the cumulative number of new T1 Gd lesions at weeks 4, 8, and 12 in the ATL1102-treated patients compared to placebo. Also assessed were the total number of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, the total number of patients with no relapse, and the EDSS.

Safety data.

Safety was evaluated on the basis of adverse events, laboratory data, vital signs, MRI assessment for PML, physical examination, 12-lead ECG, and local tolerance. Adverse events were reported by the patient or noted by the investigator over the entire study period.

Statistical procedures.

Efficacy analyses were carried out for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (randomized patients who received at least one injection of study medication, had a valid baseline MRI scan, and at least one valid postbaseline MRI scan), the ITT subset population (patients with valid postbaseline MRI brain lesion counts at weeks 4, 8, and 12), and the per-protocol (PP) population (patients with no major protocol violations).

The primary efficacy variable (cumulative number of new active lesions on MRI at weeks 4, 8, and 12) was analyzed using a negative binomial regression model. The secondary efficacy variable (cumulative volume of T1 Gd lesions on MRI at weeks 4, 8, and 12) was analyzed using a nonparametric rank analysis of covariance model. The primary and secondary efficacy analyses used treatment, sex, and country (pooled centres) as factors, and age and number or volume of enhancing lesions on screening MRI as covariates, respectively. One-sided p values, point estimates, and 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the differences between treatment groups were determined. For the primary efficacy analysis, a 1-sided significance level of 0.05 was specified in the study protocol. The sample size justification and powering are outlined in appendix e-1.

Missing MRI data due to causes other than relapse were replaced by the median lesion count of all new active lesions on MRIs taken at the same planned week for all patients within the same treatment group. Of the patients in the ITT population, 2 patients in the placebo group had one missing postbaseline scan each and one patient in the ATL1102 group had 3 missing scans postbaseline scan, all for reasons other than relapse.

RESULTS

Study patients and conduct.

Of the 95 patients screened, 77 were randomized and treated with study medications. The patient demographic data were summarized for each treatment group (table 1). Overall, the treatment groups were well-balanced with respect to demographic data. There were no clinically relevant differences with previous or concomitant medical conditions or medications. The median duration of history of MS prior to enrollment was lower in the placebo group (1.8 years, range 0.0–15.7) than in the ATL1102 group (3.0 years, range 0.0–25.8).

View this table:
Table 1

Patient demographic and MS history data of the randomized population

Five patients withdrew prematurely and 72 completed the study. Patients who discontinued the study still underwent the final examinations. The ITT population consisted of 74 patients, the ITT subset 71 patients, and the PP population 68 patients (figure 1). The mean (SD) duration of study medication in the randomized population was slightly higher in the placebo group, 55 (7.06) days, compared to ATL1102 group, 53.3 (9.32) days.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Number of patients in each stage of the study starting from all screened patients

ITT = intention-to-treat.

Efficacy.

The cumulative number of new active lesions for weeks 4, 8, and 12 (primary outcome measure) was 54.4% lower in the ATL1102 group than in the placebo group (figure 2A); mean (SD) number of new active lesions 3.0 (6.12) vs 6.2 (9.89), 1-sided p value 0.0050 (90% CI 1.2855, −0.2840) (ITT population). A significant difference between the 2 treatment groups was present at the end of the active treatment phase (week 8); mean (SD) number of new active lesions 2.6 (5.75) vs 3.6 (5.49), 1-sided p value 0.0456 (90% CI −1.0005, −0.0133) (ITT population). Similar results were found in the ITT subset and PP populations.

Figure 2
Figure 2 (A) Cumulative number of new active lesions and (B) number of new active lesions (mean ± SEM)

The cumulative T1 Gd lesion volume for weeks 4, 8, and 12 (secondary outcome measure) was lower in the ATL1102 group than the placebo group: 358 (1,028.4) mm³ vs 589 (1,107.6) mm³, with a clear trend towards significance (1-sided p = 0.0534) (90% CI −0.129, 12.863). ATL1102 significantly reduced T1 Gd lesion volume by 84.4% at week 12 compared to placebo (2-sided p = 0.0172; Wilcoxon 2-sample test) (figure 3A).

Figure 3
Figure 3 (A) T1 gadolinium (Gd) lesion volume and (B) T1 Gd lesion number (mean ± SEM)

ATL1102 reduced the cumulative number of T1 Gd lesions for weeks 4, 8, and 12 by 66.7% compared to placebo, mean (SD) 2.9 (7.92) vs 6.1 (11.13), 1-sided p value 0.0010 (ITT) (figure 3B), and reduced the cumulative number of new T1 Gd lesions for weeks 4, 8, and 12 by 67.9% compared to placebo, mean (SD) 2.1 (5.55) vs 5.2 (9.40), 1-sided p value 0.0008 (ITT) (figure e-1A). Notably, ATL1102 significantly reduced T1 Gd and new T1 Gd lesion numbers by 88.5% and 90.5%, respectively, at week 12 compared to placebo (2-sided p value = 0.010 and 0.005, respectively; Wilcoxon 2-sample test) (figure 3B and e-1B).

ATL1102 treatment led to an absolute increase of 24.8% (p = 0.0332) and relative increase of 51% (risk reduction = 73.5/48.7 = 1.51) in the percentage of T1 Gd lesion-free patients compared to placebo measured at 8 and 12 weeks combined (χ2, figure 4).

Figure 4
Figure 4 Percentage of patients without T1 gadolinium (Gd) lesions at screening and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

The number of patients with MS relapses in the 2 treatment groups were 8 (19.5%) patients in the placebo group vs 6 (16.7%) patients in the ATL1102 group; however, the difference did not reach significance. Mean EDSS scores decreased slightly during the study in both groups but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Frequencies of patients with increases or decreases in EDSS were comparable in the 2 treatment groups.

Safety.

The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the ATL1102 group were injection site erythema (25.0% patients), alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) increases (19.4%), MS relapses (16.7%), aspartate aminotransferase increases (11.1%), headache (11.1%), and thrombocytopenia (22.2%) (table e-1). MS relapse was the most frequent TEAE in the placebo group (19.5% patients). Injection site erythema, ALAT increases, and thrombocytopenia were more frequent in the ATL1102 group than in the placebo group (difference ≥5%). Serious TEAEs were MS relapses and one case of grade 2 thrombocytopenia in the ATL1102 group. No JC virus in the blood or PML was observed.

DISCUSSION

The ATL1102 trial conducted in patients with RRMS met its primary efficacy endpoint, reducing cumulative number of new active lesions at weeks 4, 8, and 12 by 54% vs placebo after 8 weeks of dosing and the cumulative number of new T1 Gd lesions by 67.9% vs placebo.

Treatment of patients with RRMS with natalizumab with 2 injections over 2 months resulted in reductions in the cumulative number of new active lesions over 12 weeks of 50% vs placebo and the cumulative number of new T1 Gd lesions by 52% vs placebo.2 Treatment of patients with MS with other drugs registered for RRMS have shown reductions in brain lesions over the first 12-week treatment period,7,–,12 albeit with different, generally lower, levels of activity. Pairwise meta-analysis comparisons between marketed treatments in longer randomized controlled trials indicate that natalizumab may have better relative effectiveness on the parameters of “patients without MRI progression” and “patients free of relapse.”13

ATL1102 demonstrated an increasing effect over time with T1 Gd lesion reductions by week 8 and the greatest T1 Gd lesion reductions observed at week 12, 4 weeks after the last dose. This extended duration of activity postdosing of ATL1102 was potentially related to the time course for the formation-turnover of new enhancing lesions and the drug's long (>3 weeks) tissue half-life.14 The extended duration of action supports the proposition of less frequent or lower dosing in longer-term studies than the twice-weekly 200-mg dosing employed in the current trial. Pharmacometric modeling suggests 200 mg once weekly, every other week, and every 3 weeks over 6 months has the potential to significantly reduce MRI brain lesions and to minimize side effects including platelet reductions.15 This dosing schedule could be employed in longer-term clinical trials.

TEAEs with a frequency of more than 10% in the ATL1102 group vs a lower frequency (difference of >5%) in the placebo group were mild to moderate injection site erythema, mild increases in liver enzyme ALAT, and a decrease in platelet count that was reversible after treatment interruption and not accompanied by any clinical consequences.

There were fewer patients with relapses in the ATL1102 group; however, this study was not powered to detect significant differences in relapses or neurologic disability as assessed by the EDSS, the view being that longer duration and larger studies are needed to see changes in these clinical parameters.2,7,–,11 MRI brain lesion reductions in longer-term studies are associated with reductions in these clinical parameters.16,17

ATL1102, like other antisense oligonucleotides of the same class, has a short half-life of 4.8 hours in the blood.14 There was no significant change in blood leukocyte CD49d RNA levels with ATL1102,14 which may reflect the short exposure of these cells to ATL1102 in the blood and poor cellular uptake. Animal studies have shown that like other antisense drugs,18 ATL1102 distributes rapidly to the bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes in relatively high drug concentrations.14 An antisense fully complementary to murine CD49d RNA reduced VLA-4 expression in inflamed lymph nodes and spleen. Accordingly, ATL1102 may be reducing CD49d RNA and VLA-4 expression on immune cells in these lymphoid tissues in patients with RRMS. Supporting this hypothesis, ATL1102 treatment produced a ∼10% reduction in the number of CD19+ (pre) B cells with detectable levels of VLA-4 expression in the blood at 8 weeks14 (appendix e-2). A small number of leukocytes are known to migrate from the secondary lymphoid tissues via the blood,19 which may be the source of these VLA-4–negative CD19+ cells in the blood.

ATL1102 treatment reduced the number of circulating CD19+ (pre) B cells (53%) and granulocytes (43%) at 8 weeks compared to treatment with placebo; T cells were less significantly reduced (∼25%), but ATL1102 treatment had no effect on monocyte or NK lymphocyte numbers14 (appendix e-2). VLA-4 has a role in the maturation, apoptosis, activation, adhesion, and migration of B and T cells.20,–,25 ATL1102 may be having an effect on one or more of these activities on CD19+ (pre) B and T cells within the lymphoid tissues of patients with RRMS, thereby reducing leukocyte number and activity in blood, and in turn the CNS, and subsequently reducing the number and volume of MS brain lesions in this RRMS study.

Natalizumab interferes with transmigration of VLA-4+ leukocytes and disproportionately increases circulating B cells more than other lymphocytes and monocytes in blood of patients with RRMS.26,27 The 44% of disease-free natalizumab-treated patients with RRMS are characterized by a substantial reduction of CD19+ B cells, particularly the CD5+ subset, and plasmablasts in the CNS.28 The therapeutic effects of CD20 antibodies that deplete CD20+ blood B cells also point to the importance of reducing proinflammatory B cells in CNS in RRMS.29

More analysis is required to characterize the pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic action of ATL1102. This also extends to ascertaining the profile of ATL1102 with respect to the risk of PML. Natalizumab increases the release of CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells and CD19+ pre B cells and CD20+ B cells into the blood, which carry latent low copy JC virus,30,31 including in individuals who are seronegative.31 Latent JC virus activation is theorized to involve B-cell differentiation, including B-cell DNA-binding protein Spi-B, which increases JCV transcription.30 Natalizumab has a long half-life in the blood (6 days), and a broad VLA-4 antagonist effect, and can impair JC virus immunosurveillance, leading to PML.4,30

Preliminary data have shown ATL1102 treatment increases CD34+ RNA 50% at week 8 vs baseline, though its effects at the CD34+ cell level need to be explored14 (appendix e-2). The reduction of CD19+ (pre) B cells with ATL1102 treatment suggests that release of lymphoid precursors into the blood may be low or they do not survive, potentially reducing the pool of cells that may carry latent virus. ATL1102 does not bind cell surface VLA-4. Natalizumab binding to VLA-4 induces intracellular signaling–associated proinflammatory effects, leading to poor outcomes in patients with PML following treatment suspension.30,32 The short ATL1102 half-life in plasma of 4.8 hours14 potentially limits exposure of circulating leukocytes to drug, which may better preserve blood leukocyte VLA-4–mediated immunosurveillance and therefore be at less risk of causing PML. IFN-β1 treatment of RRMS reduces blood mononuclear cell CD49d RNA33 and VLA-4 expression on CD8+ lymphocytes34 and CD4+CD45RO+ primed memory T cells, while preserving other blood leukocyte VLA-4 function.35 IFN-β1 has not been associated with PML.

ATL1102, which employs a unique antisense mechanism to reduce VLA-4 expression, has in this study substantially reduced disease activity in RRMS at doses that are generally well-tolerated. Longer-term trials are required to confirm its potential as a valuable additional therapeutic option in the treatment of RRMS.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

V. Limmroth was the study Principal Investigator and a member of the protocol development team, took primary responsibility for the safety oversight of the study, and revised the manuscript. F. Barkhof was a member of the protocol development team, advised on statistical aspects of the study, and revised the manuscript. N. Desem was a member of the protocol development team, managed day-to-day activities of the study, participated in the safety monitoring process, oversaw the analysis of the data, including the statistical work on the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints carried out by the Accovion GmbH Marburg Germany statistical analysis team and reporting of the study, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. M.P. Diamond was a member of the protocol development team and contributed to the analysis of the data and the writing of the manuscript. G. Tachas was a member of the protocol development team, contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data, oversaw the analysis of the statistical work on the additional and post hoc analyses carried out by the statistical analysis team of the McCloud Consulting Group, Sydney, Australia, and performed the primary writing of the manuscript.

STUDY FUNDING

The study is industry-sponsored by Antisense Therapeutics Ltd., Melbourne, Australia.

DISCLOSURE

V. Limmroth has received payment for services from the sponsor for consultancy. The Department of Neurology (Dr. Limmroth), Cologne City Hospitals, University of Cologne, Germany, has received compensation for participation in the clinical trial. F. Barkhof has received payment for services from the sponsor for consultancy. The Department of Radiology (Dr. Barkhof), VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, has received compensation for participation in the clinical trial. N. Desem holds an equity interest in the sponsor. M. Diamond holds an equity interest in the sponsor. G. Tachas holds an equity interest in the sponsor. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank (1) Prof. Krzysztof for sharing his medical expertise in Polish regulatory and ethics approval; (2) Prof. Hass, Dr. Lensch, Dr. Scholz, and Dr. Strangel for information on patient eligibility selection criteria; (3) Prof. Zettl for logistic support to the trial investigators in Germany; (4) Accovion GmbH, Marburg, Germany, for the statistical work on the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints; (5) McCloud Consulting Group, Sydney, Australia, for the statistical work on the additional and post hoc analyses; and (6) Isis Pharmaceuticals, including Dr. S.T. Crooke, Dr. R.S. Geary, Dr. S.P. Henry, Dr. T.J. Kwoh, Dr. J. Grundy, Dr. A.N. Scozzari, Dr. C.F. Bennett, and Dr. D.C. Capaldi, for sharing their expertise in antisense.

Footnotes

  • Coinvestigators are listed on the Neurology® Web site at Neurology.org.

  • Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article. The Article Processing Charge was paid by Antisense Therapeutics Ltd.

  • Editorial, page 1776

  • Supplemental data at Neurology.org

  • Received December 30, 2013.
  • Accepted in final form July 2, 2014.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial No Derivative 3.0 License, which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Goodin DS,
    2. Frohman EM,
    3. Garmany GP,
    4. et al
    . Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the MS Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Neurology 2002;58:169–178.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Tubridy N,
    2. Behan PO,
    3. Capildeo R,
    4. et al
    . The effect of anti-[alpha]4 integrin antibody on brain lesion activity in MS. Neurology 1999;53:466–472.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Polman CH,
    2. O'Connor PW,
    3. Havrdova E,
    4. et al
    . A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2006;354:899–910.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Clifford DB,
    2. De Luca A,
    3. Simpson DM,
    4. Arendt G,
    5. Giovannoni G,
    6. Nath A
    . Natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with multiple sclerosis: lessons from 28 cases. Lancet Neurol 2010;4:438–446.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Crooke ST
    . Molecular mechanisms of antisense drugs: RNase H. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev 1998;8:133–134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Baker F,
    2. Monia BP
    . Novel mechanisms for antisense-mediated regulation of gene expression. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999;1489:3–18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Moharregh-Khiabani D,
    2. Linker RA,
    3. Gold R,
    4. Stangel M
    . Fumaric acid and its esters: an emerging treatment for multiple sclerosis. Curr Neuropharmacol 2009;7:60–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Polman C,
    2. Barkhof F,
    3. Sandberg-Wollheim M,
    4. et al
    . Treatment with laquinimod reduces development of active MRI lesions in relapsing MS. Neurology 2005;64:987–991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cohen JA,
    2. Rovaris M,
    3. Goodman AD,
    4. et al
    . Randomized, double-blind dose comparison study of glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology 2007;68:939–944.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Frank JA,
    2. Richert N,
    3. Bash C,
    4. et al
    . Interferon-β-1b slows progression of atrophy in RRMS. Neurology 2004;62:719–725.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gold R,
    2. Giovannoni G,
    3. Selmaj K,
    4. et al
    . Daclizumab high-yield process in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (SELECT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2013;381:2167–2175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. O'Connor PW,
    2. Li D,
    3. Freedman MS,
    4. et al
    . Phase II study of the safety and efficacy of teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis with relapses. Neurology 2006;66:894–900.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hadjigeorgiou GM,
    2. Doxani C,
    3. Miligkos M,
    4. et al.
    A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for comparing the effectiveness and safety profile of treatments with marketing authorization for relapsing multiple sclerosis. J Clin Pharm Ther 2013;38:433–439.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Tachas G
    ; Antisense Therapeutics Ltd. assignee. Method of mobilizing stem cells. PCT application PCT/AU2011/001205 (published as WO2012/034194). September 19, 2011.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Faltin FW,
    2. Kenett RS,
    3. Ruggeri F
    1. Guzy S,
    2. Bauer R
    . Pharmacometrics in drug development: concepts and applications. In: Faltin FW, Kenett RS, Ruggeri F, eds. Statistical Methods in Healthcare. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2012:56–77.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sormani MP,
    2. Bonzano L,
    3. Roccatagliata L,
    4. Cutter GR,
    5. Mancardi GL,
    6. Bruzzi P
    . Magnetic resonance imaging as a potential surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analytic approach. Ann Neurol 2009;65:268–275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Sormani MP,
    2. Bonzano L,
    3. Roccatagliata L,
    4. Mancardi GL,
    5. Uccelli A,
    6. Bruzzi P
    . Surrogate endpoints for EDSS worsening in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analytic approach. Neurology 2010;75:302–309.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Crooke ST
    1. Geary RS,
    2. Yu RZ,
    3. Siwkowski A,
    4. Levin AA
    . Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamic properties of phosphorothioate 2´-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-modified antisense oligonucleotides in animals and man. In: Crooke ST, ed. Antisense Drug Technology: Principles, Strategies, and Applications, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2008:305–326.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Matsuno K,
    2. Ueta H,
    3. Shu Z,
    4. et al
    . The microstructure of secondary lymphoid organs that support immune cell trafficking. Arch Histol Cytol 2010;73:1–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Arroyo AG,
    2. Yang JT,
    3. Rayburn H,
    4. Hynes RO
    . Differential requirements for alpha4 integrins during fetal and adult hematopoiesis. Cell 1996;85:997–1008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Carrasco YR,
    2. Batista FD
    . B-cell activation by membrane-bound antigens is facilitated by the interaction of VLA-4 with VCAM-1. EMBO J 2006;25:889–899.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lo CG,
    2. Lu TT,
    3. Cyster JG
    . Integrin-dependence of lymphocyte entry into the splenic white pulp. J Exp Med 2003;197:353–361.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Alter A,
    2. Duddy M,
    3. Hebert S,
    4. et al
    . Determinants of human B-cell migration across brain endothelial cells. J Immunol 2003;170:4497–4505.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Tchilian EZ,
    2. Owen JJ,
    3. Jenkinson EJ
    . Anti-alpha 4 integrin antibody induces apoptosis in murine thymocytes and staphylococcal enterotoxin B-activated lymph node T-cells. Immunology 1997;92:321–327.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Niino M,
    2. Bodner C,
    3. Simard ML,
    4. et al
    . Natalizumab effects on immune cell responses in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2006;59:748–754.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Krumbholz M,
    2. Meinl L,
    3. Kumpfel T,
    4. Hohlfeld R,
    5. Meinl E
    . Natalizumab disproportionately increases circulating pre-B and B-cells in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2008;71:1350–1354.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Putzki N,
    2. Baranwal MK,
    3. Tettenborn B,
    4. Limmroth V,
    5. Kreuzfelder E
    . Effects of natalizumab on circulating B-cells, T regulatory cells and natural killer cells. Eur Neurol 2010;63:311–317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Villar LM,
    2. García-Sánchez MI,
    3. Costa-Frossard L,
    4. et al
    . Immunological markers of optimal response to natalizumab in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2012;69:191–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Krumbholz M,
    2. Derfuss T,
    3. Hohlfeld R,
    4. Meinl E
    . B-cells and antibodies in multiple sclerosis pathogenesis and therapy. Nat Rev Neurol 2012;8:613–623.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Bellizzi A,
    2. Anzivino E,
    3. Rodio DM,
    4. Palamara AT,
    5. Nencioni L,
    6. Pietropaolo V
    . New insights on human polyomavirus JC and pathogenesis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Clin Dev Immunol 2013;2013:1–17.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Frohman EM,
    2. Monaco MC,
    3. Remington G,
    4. et al
    . JC virus in CD34+ and CD19+ cells in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab. JAMA Neurol 2014;71:596–602.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Benkert TF,
    2. Dietz L,
    3. Hartmann EM,
    4. et al
    . Natalizumab exerts direct signaling capacity and supports a pro-inflammatory phenotype in some patients with multiple sclerosis. Plos One 2012;7:1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    1. Muraro PA,
    2. Liberati L,
    3. Bonanni L,
    4. et al
    . Decreased integrin gene expression in patients with MS responding to interferon-beta treatment. J Neuroimmunol 2004;150:123–131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Calabresi PA,
    2. Pelfrey CM,
    3. Tranquill LR,
    4. Maloni H,
    5. McFarland HF
    . VLA-4 expression on peripheral blood lymphocytes is downregulated after treatment of multiple sclerosis with interferon beta. Neurology 1997;49:1111–1116.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Muraro PA,
    2. Leist T,
    3. Bielekova B,
    4. McFarland HF
    . VLA-4/CD49d downregulated on primed T lymphocytes during interferon-beta therapy in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2000;111:186–194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top

More Online

CME Course

Related Articles

Topics Discussed

Alert Me