Locomotion training using voluntary driven exoskeleton (HAL) in acute incomplete SCI

Oliver Cruciger; Martin Tegenthoff; Peter Schwenkreis; Thomas A. Schildhauer; Mirko Aach

doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000645

Full PDF

Citation

Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads

1996

A 34-year-old man had a traumatic thoracic spinal cord injury, with vertebral fracture and a right acetabulum fracture. Dorsal spinal fusion of T6 through T9 was performed on admission. The initial American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (C) showed incomplete motor T10 lesion.

Exoskeletal locomotion training with hybrid assistive limb¹ started 77 days post trauma after radiologic confirmation of consolidation of the acetabulum fracture.

There was recovery of motor functions and walking abilities (video 1 on the Neurology® Web site at Neurology.org) throughout 12 weeks of locomotion training² with an increase in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) score from 8 to 18 (video 2); conversion to ASIA D occurred.

Footnotes

Supplemental data at Neurology.org
Author contributions: Dr. Cruciger: concept, acquisition and data, design and analysis. Prof. Dr. Schwenkreis: critical revision of the manuscript, supervision. Prof. Dr. Tegenthoff: critical revision of the manuscript, supervision. Prof. Dr. Schildhauer: critical revision of the manuscript, supervision. Dr. Aach: concept, design, acquisition and data, supervision.
Study funding: No targeted funding reported.
Disclosure: The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.

References

1.↵
1. Kubota S,
2. Nakata Y,
3. Eguchi K,
4. et al
. Feasibility of rehabilitation training with a newly developed wearable robot for patients with limited mobility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:1080–1087.
OpenUrl PubMed
2.↵
1. Schwartz I,
2. Sajina A,
3. Neeb M,
4. Fisher I,
5. Katz-Luerer M,
6. Meiner Z
. Locomotor training using a robotic device in patients with subacute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011;49:1062–1067.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

View Abstract

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.

Comment

NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.

Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
200 words maximum.
5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

Title *

Author Information

NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.

Authors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Publishing Agreement

I, the first and corresponding author, verify that I have read the contents of the PUBLISHING AGREEMENT form. *

I, the first and corresponding author, verify my disclosures and those of my co-authors are up to date at http://submit.neurology.org. *

Select only one of the three options below: *

I am an Author of this Work, and the Work was prepared on my own time - not as part of my duties as an employee.

I prepared (or cooperated in the preparation of) the Work as part of my duties as an employee, and the Work is, therefore, a "work made for hire", as defined by the United States Copyright Act of 1976, as amended.

I prepared (or participated in the preparation of) the Work as part of my official duties as an officer or employee of the United States Government.

NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Disputes & Debates Submission Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

[1] 1.↵
Kubota S,
Nakata Y,
Eguchi K,
et al
. Feasibility of rehabilitation training with a newly developed wearable robot for patients with limited mobility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:1080–1087.
OpenUrl PubMed

[2] Kubota S,

[3] Nakata Y,

[4] Eguchi K,

[5] et al

[6] 2.↵
Schwartz I,
Sajina A,
Neeb M,
Fisher I,
Katz-Luerer M,
Meiner Z
. Locomotor training using a robotic device in patients with subacute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011;49:1062–1067.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[7] Schwartz I,

[8] Sajina A,

[9] Neeb M,

[10] Fisher I,

[11] Katz-Luerer M,

[12] Meiner Z

Main menu

User menu

Search

Locomotion training using voluntary driven exoskeleton (HAL) in acute incomplete SCI

Citation Manager Formats

Footnotes

References

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

Plain text

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Topics Discussed

Alert Me

Articles

About

Submit

Subscribers

Main menu

User menu

Search

Share

Locomotion training using voluntary driven exoskeleton (HAL) in acute incomplete SCI

Citation Manager Formats

Share

Footnotes

References

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

Plain text

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Topics Discussed

Alert Me

Articles

About

Submit

Subscribers