Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • COVID-19
    • Practice Current
    • Practice Buzz
    • Without Borders
    • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • COVID-19
    • Practice Current
    • Practice Buzz
    • Without Borders
    • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

March 31, 2015; 84 (13) Patient Page

Changes in cognitive abilities after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease

Alexander I. Tröster, João Massano
First published March 30, 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001456
Alexander I. Tröster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
João Massano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Changes in cognitive abilities after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease
Alexander I. Tröster, João Massano
Neurology Mar 2015, 84 (13) e98-e99; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001456

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
740

Share

  • Article
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

WHY IS THIS STUDY IMPORTANT?

Persons with Parkinson disease (PD) who have difficulties from side effects or dosing of medications, or both, have the option of undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS provides electrical stimulation via electrodes implanted into one or both sides of the brain. These electrodes are connected to a programmable (adjustable) pulse generator (like a pacemaker) placed under the skin of the chest. The 2 most common targets for the brain electrodes are the subthalamic nuclei (STN) or globi pallidi (GPi). One of each of these targets is found in the left and right halves of the brain. These brain structures contain circuits important for motor functions or movement. Nearby in the brain are circuits that regulate emotion, mood, and cognition. Cognition refers to mental abilities such as memory, abstract thinking, and word finding. There is concern that the benefits of DBS for movement might be offset by negative effects of DBS on thinking and emotion. Studies have shown that DBS is safe from cognitive and emotional standpoints. Still, a minority of patients have problems with cognition and emotion after DBS. It is unclear whether stimulating the STN or GPi is safer. A few studies examining a small number of patients (and often using a limited number of tests) suggest that stimulation of the GPi might be safer than the STN for cognition and emotion.1 A large well-done study is needed to help physicians and patients make the best choices. This study by Odekerken and colleagues2 is 1 of 2 recently published that seek to address the important question of whether STN or GPi DBS is safer.

HOW WAS THIS STUDY DONE?

One hundred twenty-eight patients with PD were assigned in roughly equal numbers to undergo STN or GPi DBS. Of these, 114 completed a series of neuropsychological tests (tests of thinking ability, including, for example, memory) before and 12 months after DBS. This study compared changes in test scores before and after DBS for patients with implants at each brain location. The researchers also looked at how cognitive changes affected quality of life. They also tried to determine whether changes in thinking could have been predicted before DBS surgery.

WHAT ARE THE STUDY'S MAIN FINDINGS?

Most tests of thinking were not different in the 2 groups. Scores on 2 tests of thinking were better in the GPi group than the STN group. Both tests involved response speed. This means that as groups, the GPi and STN DBS patients mostly showed similar changes in mental abilities. This main finding did not answer all questions about the effects of DBS. The researchers compared groups of people, but those tested may have had important changes that were hidden in the group results. Group findings do not express whether the changes have an important effect on quality of life. In additional analyses, the study found that those who experienced cognitive changes had a comparable quality of life to those who did not experience such cognitive changes. In fact, quality of life improved to a similar degree after DBS in both groups. Only one test score (ability to quickly say words belonging to a category) before surgery predicted whether a person would have a decline, but the study could not convincingly explain why those with better scores on the test got worse. When looking at person characteristics, the cognitive changes tended to occur in “older” persons. However, the average ages of those showing and not showing declines (62 years vs 58 years) were quite similar.

NEXT STEPS, OR WHAT THE STUDY DOES NOT TELL US

PD is a progressive condition that involves eventual mental declines in most patients. Because of this, it is hard to identify which changes were a result of DBS, surgery, disease progression, or something else.

Another recent study helped answer this question. It compared cognitive outcomes after 6 months of DBS to outcomes after 6 months of more medical treatment.3 That study also found very few differences in outcome between DBS stimulation of the 2 different brain sites (GPi and STN). However, it did find that patients treated with DBS had greater decline on cognitive tests than patients treated with medication. The higher number of persons who had declines on multiple tests in the study by Odekerken and colleagues might reflect how decline was defined. In addition, the participants were relatively young with healthy brain function. Future studies will hopefully show whether cognitive declines are more likely to occur in those who are older or have noticeable cognitive problems already before surgery. We still need to find ways to reliably identify those patients at greatest risk for cognitive declines. For those at risk for cognitive decline, we need to understand when this decline affects quality of life to the extent that DBS might not be recommended.

  • © 2015 American Academy of Neurology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Williams NR,
    2. Foote KD,
    3. Okun MS
    . STN vs. GPi deep brain stimulation: translating the rematch into clinical practice. Mov Disord Clin Pract (Hoboken) 2014;1:24–35.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Odekerken VJJ,
    2. Boel JA,
    3. Geurtsen GJ,
    4. et al
    ; The NSTAPS Study Group. Neuropsychological outcome after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease. Neurology 2015;84:1355–1361.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rothlind JC,
    2. York MK,
    3. Carlson K,
    4. et al
    ; for CSP-468 Study Group. Neuropsychological changes following deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease: comparisons of treatment at pallidal and subthalamic targets versus best medical therapy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Epub 2014 Sep 2. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308119.
View Abstract

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.

  • Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • 200 words maximum.
  • 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Disputes & Debates Submission Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • WHY IS THIS STUDY IMPORTANT?
    • HOW WAS THIS STUDY DONE?
    • WHAT ARE THE STUDY'S MAIN FINDINGS?
    • NEXT STEPS, OR WHAT THE STUDY DOES NOT TELL US
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • Parkinson's disease/Parkinsonism
  • Surgery/Stimulation

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 96 (9)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2021 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise