Changes in cognitive abilities after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Persons with Parkinson disease (PD) who have difficulties from side effects or dosing of medications, or both, have the option of undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS provides electrical stimulation via electrodes implanted into one or both sides of the brain. These electrodes are connected to a programmable (adjustable) pulse generator (like a pacemaker) placed under the skin of the chest. The 2 most common targets for the brain electrodes are the subthalamic nuclei (STN) or globi pallidi (GPi). One of each of these targets is found in the left and right halves of the brain. These brain structures contain circuits important for motor functions or movement. Nearby in the brain are circuits that regulate emotion, mood, and cognition. Cognition refers to mental abilities such as memory, abstract thinking, and word finding. There is concern that the benefits of DBS for movement might be offset by negative effects of DBS on thinking and emotion. Studies have shown that DBS is safe from cognitive and emotional standpoints. Still, a minority of patients have problems with cognition and emotion after DBS. It is unclear whether stimulating the STN or GPi is safer. A few studies examining a small number of patients (and often using a limited number of tests) suggest that stimulation of the GPi might be safer than the STN for cognition and emotion.1 A large well-done study is needed to help physicians and patients make the best choices. This study by Odekerken and colleagues2 is 1 of 2 recently published that seek to address the important question of whether STN or GPi DBS is safer.
- © 2015 American Academy of Neurology
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.