Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

August 25, 2015; 85 (8) Article

Response to endovascular reperfusion is not time-dependent in patients with salvageable tissue

Maarten G. Lansberg, Carlo W. Cereda, Michael Mlynash, Nishant K. Mishra, Manabu Inoue, Stephanie Kemp, Søren Christensen, Matus Straka, Greg Zaharchuk, Michael P. Marks, Roland Bammer, Gregory W. Albers, For the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 2 (DEFUSE 2) Study Investigators
First published July 29, 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001853
Maarten G. Lansberg
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlo W. Cereda
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Mlynash
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nishant K. Mishra
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manabu Inoue
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Kemp
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Søren Christensen
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matus Straka
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Greg Zaharchuk
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael P. Marks
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roland Bammer
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory W. Albers
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
From the Stanford Stroke Center (M.G.L., C.W.C., M.M., N.K.M., M.I., S.K., S.C., M.S., G.Z., M.P.M., R.B., G.W.A.), Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Stroke Center (C.W.C.), Department of Neurology, Neurocenter (EOC) of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
Full PDF
Citation
Response to endovascular reperfusion is not time-dependent in patients with salvageable tissue
Maarten G. Lansberg, Carlo W. Cereda, Michael Mlynash, Nishant K. Mishra, Manabu Inoue, Stephanie Kemp, Søren Christensen, Matus Straka, Greg Zaharchuk, Michael P. Marks, Roland Bammer, Gregory W. Albers, For the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 2 (DEFUSE 2) Study Investigators
Neurology Aug 2015, 85 (8) 708-714; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001853

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
595

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether time to treatment modifies the effect of endovascular reperfusion in stroke patients with evidence of salvageable tissue on MRI.

Methods: Patients from the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 2 (DEFUSE 2) cohort study with a perfusion-diffusion target mismatch were included. Reperfusion was defined as a decrease in the perfusion lesion volume of at least 50% between baseline and early follow-up. Good functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at day 90. Lesion growth was defined as the difference between the baseline and the early follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volumes.

Results: Among 78 patients with the target mismatch profile (mean age 66 ± 16 years, 54% women), reperfusion was associated with increased odds of good functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.2–12, p = 0.03) and attenuation of lesion growth (p = 0.02). Time to treatment did not modify these effects (p value for the time × reperfusion interaction is 0.6 for good functional outcome and 0.3 for lesion growth). Similarly, in the subgroup of patients with reperfusion (n = 46), time to treatment was not associated with good functional outcome (p = 0.2).

Conclusion: The association between endovascular reperfusion and improved functional and radiologic outcomes is not time-dependent in patients with a perfusion-diffusion mismatch. Proof that patients with mismatch benefit from endovascular therapy in the late time window should come from a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

GLOSSARY

CI=
confidence interval;
DEFUSE 2=
Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 2;
DWI=
diffusion-weighted imaging;
IQR=
interquartile range;
MRP=
magnetic resonance perfusion;
MR RESCUE=
Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy;
mRS=
modified Rankin Scale;
OR=
odds ratio;
tPA=
tissue plasminogen activator

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

  • ↵* These authors contributed equally to this work.

  • DEFUSE 2 coinvestigators are listed on the Neurology® Web site at Neurology.org.

  • Supplemental data at Neurology.org

  • Received November 6, 2014.
  • Accepted in final form April 3, 2015.
  • © 2015 American Academy of Neurology
View Full Text

AAN Members

We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.

Google Safari Microsoft Edge Firefox

Click here to login

AAN Non-Member Subscribers

Click here to login

Purchase access

For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)

Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here 

Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page.  Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00.  Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means.  The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use.  Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • GLOSSARY
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • STUDY FUNDING
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Topics Discussed

  • All Cerebrovascular disease/Stroke
  • MRI
  • Clinical trials Observational study (Cohort, Case control)

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 99 (1)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Neurology: Education
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2022 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise