Standardized EEG interpretation accurately predicts prognosis after cardiac arrest
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective: To identify reliable predictors of outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest using a single routine EEG and standardized interpretation according to the terminology proposed by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
Methods: In this cohort study, 4 EEG specialists, blinded to outcome, evaluated prospectively recorded EEGs in the Target Temperature Management trial (TTM trial) that randomized patients to 33°C vs 36°C. Routine EEG was performed in patients still comatose after rewarming. EEGs were classified into highly malignant (suppression, suppression with periodic discharges, burst-suppression), malignant (periodic or rhythmic patterns, pathological or nonreactive background), and benign EEG (absence of malignant features). Poor outcome was defined as best Cerebral Performance Category score 3–5 until 180 days.
Results: Eight TTM sites randomized 202 patients. EEGs were recorded in 103 patients at a median 77 hours after cardiac arrest; 37% had a highly malignant EEG and all had a poor outcome (specificity 100%, sensitivity 50%). Any malignant EEG feature had a low specificity to predict poor prognosis (48%) but if 2 malignant EEG features were present specificity increased to 96% (p < 0.001). Specificity and sensitivity were not significantly affected by targeted temperature or sedation. A benign EEG was found in 1% of the patients with a poor outcome.
Conclusions: Highly malignant EEG after rewarming reliably predicted poor outcome in half of patients without false predictions. An isolated finding of a single malignant feature did not predict poor outcome whereas a benign EEG was highly predictive of a good outcome.
GLOSSARY
- ACNS=
- American Clinical Neurophysiology Society;
- CPC=
- Cerebral Performance Category scale;
- CI=
- confidence intervals;
- SSEP=
- somatosensory evoked potentials;
- TTM=
- Target Temperature Management;
- WLST=
- withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article. The Article Processing Charge was paid by the Swedish Research Council.
Coinvestigators are listed on the Neurology® Web site at Neurology.org.
Supplemental data at Neurology.org
Editorial, page 1470
- Received September 7, 2015.
- Accepted in final form December 1, 2015.
- © 2016 American Academy of Neurology
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Author reply to Dr. Sethi re prognostic value of sleep transients after cardiac arrest
- Erik Westhall, Physician, Dept of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Swedenerik.westhall@med.lu.se
- Andrea O. Rossetti, Lausanne, Switzerland; Tobias Cronberg, Lund, Sweden
Submitted May 17, 2016 - Routine EEG predictors of outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest
- Nitin K. Sethi, Assistant Professor of Neurology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 1006sethinitinmd@hotmail.com
Submitted May 09, 2016
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Babak Hooshmand and Dr. David Smith
► Watch
Related Articles
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Cost-effectiveness analysis of multimodal prognostication in cardiac arrest with EEG monitoringEdilberto Amorim, Shirley S. Mo, Sebastian Palacios et al.Neurology, July 13, 2020 -
Article
Prediction of regaining consciousness despite an early epileptiform EEG after cardiac arrestGiuseppina Barbella, Jong Woo Lee, Vincent Alvarez et al.Neurology, March 25, 2020 -
Articles
Neurologic prognosis and withdrawal of life support after resuscitation from cardiac arrestR. G. Geocadin, M. M. Buitrago, M. T. Torbey et al.Neurology, July 10, 2006 -
Article
Early EEG contributes to multimodal outcome prediction of postanoxic comaJeannette Hofmeijer, Tim M.J. Beernink, Frank H. Bosch et al.Neurology, June 12, 2015