Report of a workshop on research gaps in the treatment of cerebral palsy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) is heterogeneous in etiology and manifestations, making research into relevant therapies difficult and limiting the generalizability of the results. We report here on the NIH CP symposium, where stakeholders from academic, clinical, regulatory, and advocacy backgrounds discussed the major challenges and needs for moving forward with clinical research in CP, and outlined priorities and action items. New information is constantly generated through research into pathogenesis and etiology. Clinical research and new therapeutic approaches need to keep pace, through large data registry integration and new research designs. Development of standardized data collection, increasing academic focus on CP research, and iterative approaches to treatment throughout the patients' lives, have all been identified as areas of focus. The workshop identified critical gaps and areas of focus to increase the evidence base for therapeutic approaches to determine which treatments work best for which patients in the near future. These include consolidation and optimization of databases and registries, updates to the research methodology, and better integration of resources and stakeholders.
GLOSSARY
- CDE=
- common data element;
- CP=
- cerebral palsy;
- CPRN=
- Cerebral Palsy Research Network;
- NINDS=
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
- Received November 25, 2015.
- Accepted in final form June 8, 2016.
- © 2016 American Academy of Neurology
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
- Article
- Abstract
- GLOSSARY
- DEFINING THE PROBLEM
- VARIATIONS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE AND THE NEED FOR STANDARDIZATION
- MECHANISMS
- NATURAL HISTORY AND AGE-SPECIFIC THERAPY
- RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- NEW THERAPEUTIC RESOURCES AND RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
- GAPS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- PRIORITIES AND PROPOSED ACTION ITEMS
- AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
- STUDY FUNDING
- DISCLOSURE
- Footnotes
- REFERENCES
- Info & Disclosures
Related Articles
- No related articles found.