Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

July 19, 2016; 87 (3) ArticleOpen Access

The migraine postdrome

An electronic diary study

Nicola J. Giffin, Richard B. Lipton, Stephen D. Silberstein, Jes Olesen, Peter J. Goadsby
First published June 22, 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002789
Nicola J. Giffin
From the Department of Neurology (N.J.G.), Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK; Albert Einstein College of Medicine (R.B.L.), New York, NY; Thomas Jefferson University (S.D.S.), Philadelphia, PA; Danish Headache Centre (J.O.), Glostrup Hospital, Denmark; NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, UK; and Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard B. Lipton
From the Department of Neurology (N.J.G.), Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK; Albert Einstein College of Medicine (R.B.L.), New York, NY; Thomas Jefferson University (S.D.S.), Philadelphia, PA; Danish Headache Centre (J.O.), Glostrup Hospital, Denmark; NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, UK; and Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen D. Silberstein
From the Department of Neurology (N.J.G.), Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK; Albert Einstein College of Medicine (R.B.L.), New York, NY; Thomas Jefferson University (S.D.S.), Philadelphia, PA; Danish Headache Centre (J.O.), Glostrup Hospital, Denmark; NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, UK; and Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jes Olesen
From the Department of Neurology (N.J.G.), Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK; Albert Einstein College of Medicine (R.B.L.), New York, NY; Thomas Jefferson University (S.D.S.), Philadelphia, PA; Danish Headache Centre (J.O.), Glostrup Hospital, Denmark; NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, UK; and Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter J. Goadsby
From the Department of Neurology (N.J.G.), Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK; Albert Einstein College of Medicine (R.B.L.), New York, NY; Thomas Jefferson University (S.D.S.), Philadelphia, PA; Danish Headache Centre (J.O.), Glostrup Hospital, Denmark; NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility (P.J.G.), King's College London, UK; and Department of Neurology (P.J.G.), University of California, San Francisco.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
The migraine postdrome
An electronic diary study
Nicola J. Giffin, Richard B. Lipton, Stephen D. Silberstein, Jes Olesen, Peter J. Goadsby
Neurology Jul 2016, 87 (3) 309-313; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002789

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
10899

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective: To report migraine postdrome symptoms in patients who report nonheadache symptoms as part of their attacks.

Methods: A prospective daily electronic diary study was conducted over 3 months in 120 patients with migraine. Nonheadache symptoms before, during, and after headache were collected on a daily basis. Visual analogue scales were used to capture the overall level of functioning and the severity of the headache. The postdrome was defined as the time from resolution of troublesome headache to return to normal.

Results: Of 120 evaluable patients, 97 (81%) reported at least one nonheadache symptom in the postdrome. Postdrome symptoms, in order of frequency, included feeling tired/weary and having difficulty concentrating and stiff neck. Many patients also reported a mild residual head discomfort. In most attacks (93%), there was return to normal within 24 hours after spontaneous pain resolved. There was no relationship between medication taken for the headache and the duration of the postdrome. The severity of the migraine was not associated with the duration of the postdrome. Overall state of health scores remained low during the postdrome.

Conclusion: Nonheadache symptoms in the postdrome were common and may contribute to the distress and disability in the patients studied. Postdrome symptoms merit larger observational studies and careful recording in clinical trials of acute and preventive migraine treatments.

GLOSSARY

ICHD=
International Classification of Headache Disorders

Migraine is a common, disabling neurologic disorder characterized by a typically unilateral, often throbbing headache with associated features. The migraine attack is typically divided into 4 nonobligatory phases: the premonitory phase, the aura, the headache phase, and the postdrome. Nonheadache symptoms may start before the headache phase begins or during the premonitory period,1 the headache phase, or the postdrome. These symptoms involve brain activation of cortical and subcortical structures.2 Nonheadache symptoms may persist for 1 to 2 days after the headache has resolved in the postdrome or recovery phase.3 Postdromal symptoms, identified by retrospective recall of typical experiences, include tiredness, impaired concentration, and reduced mood.4

The postdrome, while disabling for many patients,3,–,6 has not been prospectively documented, and is not defined in the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD).7 Electronic diaries, completed during and after migraine attacks, have many advantages for studying nonheadache symptoms. Contemporaneous diary reporting reduces recall bias. The electronic diary provides time-stamping so that investigators know when data were recorded. The purpose of this study is to characterize nonheadache symptoms in persons with migraine reporting these. Descriptive data on postdromal features may shed light on their mechanisms and offer novel approaches to treating and terminating headaches.

METHODS

Migraine patients (n = 120) who claimed to experience nonheadache symptoms other than aura, nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia preheadache, in at least 2 of 3 migraine attacks, were recruited from 4 centers and enrolled in a 3-month electronic diary study. The study was designed to detail nonheadache features in all phases of the migraine attack. The methods of this study have been previously described when the premonitory data were presented.1

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents.

The study was reviewed by each center's ethics board and patients gave written, informed consent.

Patients had between 2 and 8 migraines per month by the ICHD-1 criteria, which are similar to ICHD-3-beta criteria.7 Participants eligible for analyses had to record data from at least 3 headache attacks.

Definition.

The postdrome was defined as the time between headache resolution and feeling completely back to normal. Headache resolution was defined as cessation of troublesome headache.

Diaries.

The diaries were programmed to alarm randomly once daily during waking hours. Patients answered questions to capture nonheadache symptoms before, during, and after the migraine headache. Patients were encouraged to make voluntary entries when they experienced nonheadache symptoms or were experiencing a migraine attack. Diary entries could not be altered once confirmed by the participant.

Analysis.

Data were tabulated and descriptive statistics were calculated using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). As an exploratory study, no power calculation was performed. Statistical testing was carried out using a level of significance of p < 0.05 (SPSS 22; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

Of 120 recruited patients, 23 reported fewer than 3 migraines during the study period and were excluded from the analysis. Of the remaining 97, there were 9 protocol violators: 1 did not usually experience 2–8 migraines per month, 5 recorded diary entries on fewer than 80% of days, and 3 took excluded medications: flunarizine or valproate. Twelve patients withdrew before the end of the study with diary fatigue, though all had usable data with more than 3 migraine headaches in the study period and were included in the analysis. A total of 352 diary entries during the postdrome were recorded: 160 recorded spontaneously by patients, 192 prompted by the electronic diary, and a further 421 afterwards. Data on a total of 773 migraine attacks with postdromes out of a total 873 migraine attacks from 97 patients were recorded.

Overall nonheadache symptoms in the postdrome before electronic diary use.

Of the analyzed patients, 82 of 97 (85%) patients estimated before using the electronic diary that they experienced nonheadache symptoms after the headache resolved. Of these 82 patients, 54 (66%) estimated that they had nonheadache postdrome symptoms in more than 90% of their migraine attacks. The postdrome was estimated to linger for at least a day in 49% of patients (table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Details of postdrome symptoms estimated by patients before using the electronic diary

Postdrome symptoms recorded in the electronic diary.

Symptoms in the postdrome.

We divided postdromal symptoms into 3 broad groups: cognitive/mood/energy, autonomic, and gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as sensory sensitivity. Being tired or weariness was the most common symptom, reported in 88% of postdromes. Other frequently reported symptoms included difficulty with concentration (56%) and stiff neck (42%). Typical migraine attack symptoms of nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia were also common (table 2). Mean quality of life score, as measured on a visual analogue rating score, was 57/100, compared to 51 in the premonitory phase, 33 during the headache phase, and 81 between attacks.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

Relative frequency of postdromal symptoms reported at baseline and recorded prospectively in the electronic diary study

Time to recovery in the postdrome.

There was a return to normal within 6 hours of the end of the headache in 422 of 773 (54%) migraine attacks with a postdrome; only 7% lasted more than 24 hours (table 3). Headache severity did not predict length of the postdrome (F3,5 = 3.2, p = 0.25; table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3

Return to normal in each time interval from end of migraine headache to the end of the postdrome by medication taken to relieve migraine headache or headache severity

Effect of medications.

The duration of the postdrome did not vary significantly with the medication taken to relieve the migraine headache or headache severity (F2,5 = 6.8, p = 0.08; table 3).

Difference in the relative frequency of recalled and diary-based estimates of postdromal symptoms.

In table 2, we list the proportion of patients who report each postdrome symptom at baseline and compare it with the proportion who recorded those symptoms in the electronic diaries. There is a striking underestimation of the frequency of neck stiffness and sensitivity to light and noise.

DISCUSSION

We have shown in this study that postdrome symptoms are a frequent feature of migraine attacks in patients who report nonheadache symptoms, with more than 80% of attacks being followed by such symptoms. The data show that prevalence of these symptoms is underreported using recall at baseline relative to contemporaneous measurement using daily e-diaries. When identified, patients acknowledge the disabling nature of premonitory symptoms. Interestingly, the treatment type and attack severity did not seem to influence the duration of the postdrome. Data from this report, when combined with an earlier report from this cohort on the premonitory phase,1 reveals that some symptoms begin in the premonitory phase and extend through the postdrome. Given the reduced quality of life associated with these symptoms, and the importance of better understanding of attack termination, the postdrome deserves more systematic study.

Our data are in accordance with reported retrospective studies. In one study, 47 of 50 patients remained symptomatic after their headache had ended.4 In that study, the most frequent symptoms were changes in mood (72%), muscular weakness (54%), and reduced appetite. In another study, 78 out of 100 unselected migraineurs reported resolution symptoms in a given attack5; most common were asthenia (55%), tiredness (46%), somnolence (29%), and concentration difficulties (28%). A large clinic-based sample found that 562 of 827 patients retrospectively reported postdromes; in 88%, they lasted less than 24 hours. Tiredness was the most common symptom in 72%.3 In a US study designed to test a postdrome instrument, patients (n = 32) again reported tiredness, nausea, and concentration difficulties most commonly.6

Most studies of postdromes have methodologic limitations. Retrospective studies are open to recall bias. The most recently experienced or severe postdromal symptoms may be selectively recalled and other features may be forgotten. Paper diaries may be retrospectively completed at times remote from the headache attack. In contrast, our study recorded the postdrome symptoms on a prospective basis, using a time-stamped electronic diary that could not be modified once data had been entered. Thus, we can be confident that features were recorded at the stated time, facilitating the assessment of individual attacks.

Characterization of postdromal nonheadache symptoms may lead us to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of the migraine process. Migraine pathophysiology involves dysfunction of diencephalic and brainstem centers thought to be involved in pain processing and other sensory modalities modulation.8 Pontine and midbrain structures have altered function during migraine attacks and after remissions that occur with triptans. Although triptans effectively treat migraine headache, they do not alter the fundamental brainstem mechanisms responsible for migraine generation.8 This may explain why although head pain is ameliorated by triptans, nonheadache symptoms persist.

There was little difference in postdrome duration between treated and untreated attacks. However, this was not a controlled study and no firm conclusion on the effect of medication on the postdrome can be reached. We did not analyze the time taken to recover in the postdrome after taking triptans compared to other medication. The effect of triptans on the postdrome has never been studied systematically and this is potentially an unexplored therapeutic area that would be of benefit to migraineurs.

Our study has several limitations. While we are confident that the symptoms were present during the postdromal phase, their background prevalence was not recorded, as we primarily recruited patients with premonitory symptoms. There are little data on the prevalence of interictal symptoms in migraineurs. Fatigue is reported in up to 70% of patients with chronic headache9 and severe headache; sleep difficulty (60%) and nausea/indigestion (55%) are also common.10 We only studied patients selected from headache centers based on their nonheadache symptoms, limiting the generalizability of the conclusions. Population-based studies are needed to determine prevalence. Most symptoms were estimated reasonably accurately at baseline compared to those recorded in the diaries. We have not correlated the symptoms to medicine use, and conceivably some may be treatment effects. The underestimation of neck stiffness, light sensitivity, and noise sensitivity may occur because these symptoms are prominent during the headache phase and patients do not usually perceive them to be a problem after the headache.

The persistence of nonheadache symptoms throughout all phases of the migraine attack supports the hypothesis of persistent brain changes in the attack. An altered functional state may develop during the premonitory period and persist throughout the headache phase into the postdrome. The description of these symptoms opens the new challenge to pursue their biology and eventually better manage migraine.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Nicola Giffin: abstracted the data, drafted sections of the manuscript, and performed statistical analyses. Richard Lipton: helped design the study and analysis and drafted sections of the manuscript. Stephen Silberstein: helped design the study and reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content. Jes Olesen: helped design the study and reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content. Peter J. Goadsby: helped design the study and analysis, drafted and revised the manuscript for intellectual content.

STUDY FUNDING

Funded by GlaxoSmithKline. The King's CRF is funded by the NIHR and by the South London and the Maudsley Mental Health BRC. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health, UK. The Article Processing Charge was paid by the authors.

DISCLOSURE

N. Giffin reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. R. Lipton receives research support from the NIH: PO1 AG003949 (Program Director), RO1AG025119 (Investigator), RO1AG022374-06A2 (Investigator), RO1AG034119 (Investigator), RO1AG12101 (Investigator), and the National Headache Foundation; serves on the editorial board of Neurology® and as senior advisor to Headache; has reviewed for the NIA and NINDS; holds stock options in eNeura Therapeutics; serves as consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria from Alder, Allergan, the American Headache Society, Autonomic Technologies, Avanir, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Colucid, Dr. Reddy's, Electrocore, Eli Lilly, eNeura Therapeutics, Informa, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva, and Vedanta; and receives royalties from Wolff's Headache, 8th edition, Oxford Press University, 2009. S. Silberstein: as a consultant and/or advisory panel member, Dr. Stephen Silberstein receives honoraria from Alder Biopharmaceuticals; Allergan, Inc.; Amgen; Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Curelator, Inc.; Depomed; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories; eNeura Inc.; electroCore Medical, LLC; Lilly USA, LLC; Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Teva Pharmaceuticals; and Trigemina, Inc. J. Olesen reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. P. Goadsby reports grants and personal fees from Allergan, grants and personal fees from eNeura Inc, personal fees from Autonomic Technologies Inc., grants and personal fees from Amgen Inc., personal fees from Alder Biopharmaceuticals, personal fees from Pfizer Inc., personal fees from Dr Reddy's Laboratories, personal fees from Zosano Pharma Corporation, personal fees from Colucid Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., personal fees from Eli Lilly and Company, personal fees from Avanir Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from WL Gore & Associates, personal fees from Heptares Therapeutics, personal fees from Nupathe Inc., personal fees from Teva, personal fees from Cipla Ltd., personal fees from Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals Co., personal fees from Akita Biomedical, personal fees from Wells Fargo, personal fees from Ethicon, US, personal fees from EMKinetics, personal fees from Promius Pharma, personal fees from Supernus, personal fees and other from Trigemina, personal fees from MedicoLegal work, personal fees from Journal Watch, and personal fees from Up-to-Date, outside the submitted work; and has a patent magnetic stimulation for headache pending, outside the submitted work. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article. The Article Processing Charge was paid by the authors.

  • Received September 11, 2015.
  • Accepted in final form April 8, 2016.
  • © 2016 American Academy of Neurology

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Giffin NJ,
    2. Ruggiero L,
    3. Lipton RB, et al.
    Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology 2003;60:935–940.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Maniyar FH,
    2. Sprenger T,
    3. Monteith T,
    4. Schankin C,
    5. Goadsby PJ
    . Brain activations in the premonitory phase of nitroglycerin triggered migraine attacks. Brain 2014;137:232–242.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kelman L
    . The postdrome of the acute migraine attack. Cephalalgia 2006;26:214–220.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Blau JN
    . Resolution of migraine attacks: sleep and the recovery phase. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1982;45:223–226.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Quintela E,
    2. Castillo J,
    3. Munoz P,
    4. Pascual J
    . Premonitory and resolution symptoms in migraine: a prospective study in 100 unselected patients. Cephalalgia 2006;26:1051–1060.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ng-Mak DS,
    2. Fitzgerald KA,
    3. Norquist JM, et al.
    Key concepts of migraine postdrome: a qualitative study to develop a post-migraine questionnaire. Headache 2011;51:105–117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013;33:629–808.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Akerman S,
    2. Holland P,
    3. Goadsby PJ
    . Diencephalic and brainstem mechanisms in migraine. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011;12:570–584.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Spierings E,
    2. van Hoof M
    . Fatigue and sleep in chronic headache sufferers: an age- and sex-controlled questionnaire study. Headache 1997;37:549–552.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Maizels M,
    2. Burchette R
    . Somatic symptoms in headache patients: the influence of headache diagnosis, frequency, and comorbidity. Headache 2004;44:983–993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

  • Migraine postdrome and pathogenesis
    • Vinod K. Gupta, Physician, GUPTA MEDICAL CENTREdr_vkgupta@yahoo.com
    Submitted August 23, 2016
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • GLOSSARY
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • STUDY FUNDING
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations A Clinical and Genetic Study

Dr. Robert Shapiro and Dr. Amynah Pradhan

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All Clinical Neurology
  • Migraine

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 100 (6)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise