Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

August 30, 2016; 87 (9 Supplement 2) Article

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

Updates on an inflammatory CNS syndrome

Daniela Pohl, Gulay Alper, Keith Van Haren, Andrew J. Kornberg, Claudia F. Lucchinetti, Silvia Tenembaum, Anita L. Belman
First published August 29, 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002825
Daniela Pohl
From the Division of Neurology (D.P.), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Division of Child Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Neurology (K.V.H.), Stanford University; Division of Child Neurology (K.V.H.), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (A.J.K.), Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology (C.F.L.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (S.T.), National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Department of Neurology (A.L.B.), School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gulay Alper
From the Division of Neurology (D.P.), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Division of Child Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Neurology (K.V.H.), Stanford University; Division of Child Neurology (K.V.H.), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (A.J.K.), Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology (C.F.L.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (S.T.), National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Department of Neurology (A.L.B.), School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith Van Haren
From the Division of Neurology (D.P.), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Division of Child Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Neurology (K.V.H.), Stanford University; Division of Child Neurology (K.V.H.), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (A.J.K.), Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology (C.F.L.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (S.T.), National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Department of Neurology (A.L.B.), School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Kornberg
From the Division of Neurology (D.P.), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Division of Child Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Neurology (K.V.H.), Stanford University; Division of Child Neurology (K.V.H.), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (A.J.K.), Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology (C.F.L.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (S.T.), National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Department of Neurology (A.L.B.), School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia F. Lucchinetti
From the Division of Neurology (D.P.), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Division of Child Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Neurology (K.V.H.), Stanford University; Division of Child Neurology (K.V.H.), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (A.J.K.), Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology (C.F.L.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (S.T.), National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Department of Neurology (A.L.B.), School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Tenembaum
From the Division of Neurology (D.P.), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Division of Child Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Neurology (K.V.H.), Stanford University; Division of Child Neurology (K.V.H.), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (A.J.K.), Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology (C.F.L.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (S.T.), National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Department of Neurology (A.L.B.), School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita L. Belman
From the Division of Neurology (D.P.), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Division of Child Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Neurology (K.V.H.), Stanford University; Division of Child Neurology (K.V.H.), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (A.J.K.), Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology (C.F.L.), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology (S.T.), National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Juan P. Garrahan, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Department of Neurology (A.L.B.), School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Updates on an inflammatory CNS syndrome
Daniela Pohl, Gulay Alper, Keith Van Haren, Andrew J. Kornberg, Claudia F. Lucchinetti, Silvia Tenembaum, Anita L. Belman
Neurology Aug 2016, 87 (9 Supplement 2) S38-S45; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002825

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
21186

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is an immune-mediated demyelinating CNS disorder with predilection to early childhood. ADEM is generally considered a monophasic disease. However, recurrent ADEM has been described and defined as multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis. ADEM often occurs postinfectiously, although a causal relationship has never been established. ADEM and multiple sclerosis are currently viewed as distinct entities, generally distinguishable even at disease onset. However, pathologic studies have demonstrated transitional cases of yet unclear significance. ADEM is clinically defined by acute polyfocal neurologic deficits including encephalopathy. MRI typically demonstrates reversible, ill-defined white matter lesions of the brain and often also the spinal cord, along with frequent involvement of thalami and basal ganglia. CSF analysis may reveal a mild pleocytosis and elevated protein, but is generally negative for intrathecal oligoclonal immunoglobulin G synthesis. In the absence of a specific diagnostic test, ADEM is considered a diagnosis of exclusion, and ADEM mimics, especially those requiring a different treatment approach, have to be carefully ruled out. The role of biomarkers, including autoantibodies like anti–myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of ADEM is currently under debate. Based on the presumed autoimmune etiology of ADEM, the current treatment approach consists of early immunotherapy. Outcome of ADEM in pediatric patients is generally favorable, but cognitive deficits have been reported even in the absence of other neurologic sequelae. This review summarizes the current knowledge on epidemiology, pathology, clinical presentation, neuroimaging features, CSF findings, differential diagnosis, therapy, and outcome, with a focus on recent advances and controversies.

GLOSSARY

ADEM=
acute disseminated encephalomyelitis;
ADEM-ON=
acute disseminated encephalomyelitis followed by optic neuritis;
AHL=
acute hemorrhagic leukoencephalopathy;
IgG=
immunoglobulin G;
IPMSSG=
International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group;
MDEM=
multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis;
MOG=
myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein;
MS=
multiple sclerosis;
NMOSD=
neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders;
OCB=
oligoclonal band

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is an immune-mediated demyelinating CNS disorder, characterized clinically by new-onset polyfocal neurologic symptoms including encephalopathy, coupled with neuroimaging evidence of multifocal demyelination. ADEM is classically considered a monophasic illness, with highest incidence in early childhood. The first descriptions of an ADEM-like disorder with recognition of a temporal relationship to infections (especially smallpox and measles) date back to the 18th century.1 Over a century later, an association of ADEM with vaccines, notably rabies, was reported. Mortality rates were high (up to 30% for ADEM following measles infection), and neurologic sequelae frequent.2,3 Successful immunization programs for measles, mumps, and rubella and the development of vaccines devoid of neural elements led to a marked decrease of ADEM following those events. However, ADEM continues to be among the most frequent demyelinating disorders in childhood.4,5 Immunotherapy is considered standard of care and may contribute to faster recovery and improved outcomes as compared to historic reports, although clear-cut evidence for this assumption is lacking.

We review epidemiologic, pathological, clinical, and neuroimaging findings of ADEM, with updates on diagnostic criteria, differential diagnostic workup, and treatment strategies.

DEFINITIONS

ADEM has historically been an umbrella term for noninfectious acute inflammatory demyelinating events of the CNS, particularly occurring in children. Until recently, the definition of ADEM varied widely, leading to differences in the phenotypes reported. In 2007, the International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (IPMSSG) proposed consensus definitions for pediatric acquired demyelinating disorders of the CNS to improve consistency in terminology.6 In 2013, the original definitions were updated.7 ADEM remains a diagnosis of exclusion, always necessitating thorough consideration of alternate diagnoses. Beyond this, the new ADEM criteria require the following:

  1. A first polyfocal clinical CNS event with presumed inflammatory demyelinating cause

  2. Encephalopathy (alteration in consciousness or behavior unexplained by fever, systemic illness, or postictal symptoms)

  3. Brain MRI abnormalities consistent with demyelination during the acute (3 months) phase

  4. No new clinical or MRI findings 3 months or more after the clinical onset

The clinical symptoms and radiologic findings of ADEM can fluctuate in severity and evolve in the first 3 months after onset. Accordingly, a second event is defined as the development of new symptoms more than 3 months after the start of the incident illness. Data to support the biological rationale for the 3-month requirement are needed.

Nonmonophasic ADEM.

A small but important subset of patients with ADEM will subsequently be diagnosed with relapsing disorders, including neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). We currently have insufficient diagnostic technologies to reliably distinguish this subset from the majority of patients with ADEM for whom the disease course is monophasic (table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

ADEM and its convergence with relapsing demyelinating disorders

The category of recurrent ADEM was eliminated in the 2013 criteria, and replaced by the term multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis (MDEM), describing 2 episodes consistent with ADEM, separated by at least 3 months. A third ADEM-like event is no longer consistent with MDEM, but indicates a chronic relapsing demyelinating disorder, often leading to a diagnosis of ADEM followed by optic neuritis (ADEM-ON), NMOSD, or possibly MS.10,–,12 A positive serum anti-aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer facilitates a diagnosis of NMOSD.9,12 As per the 2013 IPMSSG criteria, a relapse after an initial ADEM event may lead to a diagnosis of MS if it is nonencephalopathic, occurs more than 3 months after the ADEM manifestation, and is associated with new MRI findings consistent with the 2010 revised McDonald MS criteria for dissemination in space.7,8 Since the publication of the 2013 IPMSSG definitions, there has been increasing interest in the role of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody response in immune-mediated CNS disorders.13 Based on recent publications, ADEM-ON has been introduced as a new relapsing clinical phenotype associated with anti-MOG antibodies.10 Of note, the MRI of patients with ADEM-ON demonstrates resolution of previous ADEM lesions without new T2 or contrast-enhancing lesions (apart from the optic nerve) at the time of optic neuritis attacks, thereby not fulfilling MS MRI criteria for dissemination in space.10 Taken together, these studies identified similar clinical and radiologic features in a MOG-IgG-positive subpopulation of patients with ADEM, and MOG-IgG seropositivity has been reported to plead against a diagnosis of MS in several independent recent studies.13,–,15 However, the exact role of MOG antibodies is controversial.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Population-based studies show the incidence of ADEM to be 0.3–0.6 per 100,000 per year.16,17 Nationwide surveys of ADEM in Germany, Canada, and Great Britain report incidences of 0.1–0.3 per 100,000 children per year.4,5,18 Incidences were higher in the northwest than in the south of the United States, possibly secondary to a geographic distribution similar to that of MS, with an increase in incidence with increasing distance from the equator.19 The median age at presentation of ADEM is 5–8 years, with male predominance.18,20 The risk of postimmunization ADEM is significantly lower than the risk of developing ADEM following the infection itself.21 Considering the frequency of vaccinations and infections in young children, with up to 8 episodes of upper respiratory tract infections per year considered as normal, a chronologic association between a vaccination or an infection and ADEM does not prove causality.

PATHOLOGY

The hallmark of ADEM pathology consists of perivenular sleeves of demyelination associated with inflammatory infiltrates of myelin-laden macrophages, T and B lymphocytes, occasional plasma cells, and granulocytes.22 Lesions are of similar histologic age, and may demonstrate acute axonal injury. Larger areas of demyelination are a consequence of coalescence of numerous perivenous demyelinating lesions.22 In contrast, MS lesions are characterized by confluent demyelination associated with sheets of macrophage infiltration admixed with reactive astrocytes in completely demyelinated regions. However, transitional cases of both perivenous and confluent demyelination in the same patient have been described, suggesting a potential for misclassification even with biopsy.22 ADEM is the only disorder, aside from MS, in which the full spectrum of cortical lesions can be identified, including subpial demyelinated lesions and intracortical lesions.22 A pattern of cortical microglial activation distinct from MS, characterized by multifocal microglial aggregates, not associated with cortical demyelination, can also be found in ADEM. These diffuse cortical microglial alterations may represent the pathologic substrate of the depressed level of consciousness typically observed in patients with ADEM.22

Whether acute hemorrhagic leukoencephalopathy (AHL) is a separate disease entity or a hyperacute severe variant of ADEM remains controversial. AHL lesions are characterized by the presence of hemorrhages, vessel fibrinoid necrosis, perivascular exudation, edema, and granulocyte infiltration, with perivascular demyelination and reactive astrocytosis typically seen later in disease evolution. A recent report of a fulminant case of AHL revealed perivenular hemorrhages, edema, and granulocytes in the absence of demyelination.23 Perivascular astrocytes demonstrated dystrophic and swollen processes, suggesting astrocytic damage may be an early event that precedes demyelination in AHL.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

ADEM is characterized by an acute onset of encephalopathy in association with polyfocal neurologic deficits, sometimes preceded by prodromal symptoms (fever, malaise, irritability, somnolence, headache, nausea, and vomiting). The clinical course of ADEM is typically rapidly progressive, with maximal deficits within 2 to 5 days.20 A severe presentation resulting in admission to an intensive care unit has been reported in 15%–25% of children with ADEM.24,25 Frequent neurologic manifestations include pyramidal signs, ataxia, acute hemiparesis, optic neuritis or other cranial nerve involvement, seizures, spinal cord syndrome, and impairment of speech. Rarely, respiratory failure occurs due to brainstem involvement. Seizures may develop into status epilepticus.20,26 Fever and seizures are described more frequently in ADEM compared to other acute demyelinating syndromes. Combined central and peripheral demyelination has been reported,27,–,30 but should prompt diligent differential diagnostic workup including screening for other immune-mediated disorders, as well as for leukoencephalopathies of genetic/metabolic origin (e.g., mitochondriopathies, Krabbe disease, X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease).31,32

NEUROIMAGING FEATURES

MRI T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images typically demonstrate multiple hyperintense bilateral, asymmetric patchy and poorly marginated lesions.20 Usually different sizes of lesions are seen in the same patient.33 Tumefactive lesions with perilesional edema have been reported.34 ADEM lesions typically involve the subcortical and central white matter and cortical gray–white matter junction, thalami, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and brainstem.11,20,33,34 (figure, A–C) Spinal cord involvement has been described in up to 1/3 of patients, often demonstrating large confluent lesions extending over multiple segments, sometimes associated with cord swelling.20,35 Gadolinium enhancement is reported in up to 30% of patients.20 Main differentiating features of ADEM compared to MS are periventricular sparing and absence of periventricular ovoid lesions perpendicular to the ventricular edge (Dawson fingers).34,–,36 The figure and table 2 summarize MRI characteristics of ADEM vs MS. There are, however, no absolute imaging criteria to differentiate ADEM from MS.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure Representative images demonstrate typical MRI appearances of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (A-C) and multiple sclerosis (MS) (D-F)

T2-weighted images from a patient with ADEM show bilateral diffuse, multifocal, poorly marginated, large asymmetric lesions of the white matter, basal ganglia, and cortical gray matter (A, B); coronal fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image demonstrates asymmetric involvement of the thalami (C). FLAIR images from a patient with MS demonstrate multifocal, asymmetric, mostly well-defined ovoid lesions of the white matter, with periventricular predominance and sparing of the basal ganglia, on axial (D, E) and coronal (F) views.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

MRI characteristics in ADEM vs MS

Follow-up imaging.

Serial MRIs play an important role to confirm the ADEM diagnosis in retrospect. Monophasic ADEM is per definition not associated with the development of new lesions more than 3 months after disease onset.7 Complete or partial resolution of MRI abnormalities has been described in the majority of patients.26 The authors suggest reassessing patients with at least 2 additional MRIs (e.g., 3 months and 9–12 months after clinical onset), in order to rule out ongoing disease activity indicating a diagnosis other than ADEM. However, frequency and timing of reimaging will have to take into account age and clinical characteristics, and may be deferred in asymptomatic young children requiring sedation for their MRIs.

New MRI techniques.

There have been conflicting reports of MRI diffusion patterns showing reduced or increased diffusion within ADEM lesions.37,38 Recently, apparent diffusion coefficient values were found to be increased in the majority (70%) of 17 children with ADEM, consistent with vasogenic edema.39 Data on magnetic resonance spectroscopy of ADEM are limited. In a single pediatric case report, low levels of N-acetylaspartate were measured within lesions, normalizing at follow-up.40 As opposed to MS, magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor imaging findings measured in normal-appearing brain tissue were not different between ADEM and healthy controls, possibly indicating that the pathologic process of ADEM is sparing normal-appearing brain tissue.41

CSF FINDINGS

CSF studies in ADEM are notable for their lack of confirmatory features. CSF leukocyte count has been described to be normal in 42%–72% of children with ADEM.16,20,42,–,44 Pleocytosis is typically mild, with a high percentage of lymphocytes and monocytes.44,45 CSF protein is increased (up to 1.1 g/L) in 23%–62% of pediatric patients with ADEM.16,20,42,–,44 An elevated CSF IgG index has been reported in 2/54 and 3/13 children in 2 pediatric ADEM cohorts. Of note, none of these patients with elevated IgG indices had CSF oligoclonal bands (OCBs).20,34 Indeed, most notably, OCBs are a rare phenomenon in children with ADEM diagnosed according to IPMSSG consensus definitions. Out of 53 patients described in 3 more recent case series, OCBs were only detected in one patient (1.9%).34,42,43 In cases where CSF OCBs are detected in ADEM, they tend to manifest as mirror bands present in both serum and CSF, and would therefore not be considered as true OCBs per definition, but suggest an antibody production that is not intrathecally restricted.46 Infectious studies of the CSF are, by definition, negative in ADEM with the caveat that the breadth and sensitivity of current infectious assays remain limited.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS, INVESTIGATIONS, AND WORKUP

The diagnosis of ADEM is made on clinical grounds with MRI support. Variable clinical manifestations and lack of specific biological markers imply that the diagnosis requires exclusion of differential diagnoses. The first priority is to rule out potentially treatable CNS infections. The authors recommend gadolinium-enhanced brain and spinal cord MRI, and CSF studies including cell count, protein, lactate, IgG index, and oligoclonal IgG (in CSF and serum), in addition to screening for infectious agents, especially herpes simplex virus, enterovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and mycoplasma. Bloodwork will typically include complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, antinuclear antibodies, NMO-IgG, and MOG antibodies. Extensive, specialized testing for alternative disorders is guided by red flags (table 3). An MRI-based approach to the differential diagnosis of ADEM is provided in table 4.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3

Red flags for a diagnosis of ADEM and possible differential diagnoses

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4

Differential diagnosis of ADEM guided by MRI

Differentiation of ADEM and MS is of prognostic and therapeutic importance. Children with ADEM are generally younger, and systemic symptoms such as fever, vomiting, meningism, and headache are much more common in ADEM than MS. Intrathecal oligoclonal IgG synthesis is a hallmark of MS, but atypical in ADEM. Disease activity (clinical or MRI) >3 months after ADEM onset points towards a chronic disorder like ADEM-ON, MS, or NMOSD (table 1). Discriminatory MRI features of ADEM and MS are listed in table 2.

TREATMENT

There are no randomized studies for the treatment of ADEM. Thus, management of ADEM is based on expert opinions and observational studies.20,26,47 Despite the lack of conclusive evidence, high-dose corticosteroids are currently widely accepted as first-line therapy.48 A typical treatment regimen consists of IV methylprednisolone at a dose of 30 mg/kg/d (maximally 1,000 mg/d) for 5 days, followed by an oral taper over 4–6 weeks with a starting dose of prednisone of 1–2 mg/kg/d. An increased risk of relapse was observed with steroid taper of ≤3 weeks.49 IV immunoglobulin treatment has been described in case reports and small case series, mostly in combination with corticosteroids or as a second-line treatment in steroid-unresponsive ADEM.50,51 The usual total dose is 2 g/kg, administered over 2–5 days.47 Plasma exchange is recommended for therapy-refractory patients with fulminant disease, e.g., using 7 exchanges every other day.47 In single case reports, patients with fulminant ADEM and cerebral edema have been treated with hypothermia or decompressive craniotomy.52,53

OUTCOME

The majority of children with ADEM are reported to have full recovery. Typically, neurologic improvement is seen within days following initiation of treatment, and recovery to baseline will occur within weeks rather than months.54 However, mortality rates of 1%–3% have been reported recently,24,25 and long-term cognitive deficits have been observed, affecting attention, executive function, verbal processing, and behavior, as well as IQ scores, specifically in children with ADEM before age 5 years.55,56

Relapsing ADEM—MDEM—has been reported, although at much lower frequency (<10%) since implementation of the 2007 ADEM criteria. It is currently under debate whether patients with relapsing ADEM represent a distinct group of children with other neuroimmunologic diseases like NMOSD or MOG-antibodies-associated disorders. ADEM as a first manifestation of MS appears to be uncommon, occurring in <10% of patients with ADEM.20 Predictors of MS following ADEM and other acute demyelinating syndromes are discussed in “Pediatric acquired CNS demyelinating syndromes: Features associated with multiple sclerosis” by Hintzen et al. (p. S67).

CONTROVERSIES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

ADEM is possibly not a single specific disease, but an inflammatory CNS syndrome with immune-mediated demyelination and strong predilection to young children. Further delineation of potentially different etiologies for an ADEM presentation, including antibodies to CNS proteins like aquaporin or MOG, will hopefully enhance our understanding of the disease and facilitate treatment decisions. The question whether and how often ADEM can present as the first manifestation of MS is still under debate. In view of the relatively low incidence of ADEM, multicenter studies are required to provide more information with regards to pathogenesis, biomarkers, differential diagnoses, and therapeutic options, with the ultimate goal to promote efficacious and specific treatment approaches in order to optimize long-term outcomes in children with demyelinating disorders.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Daniela Pohl: abstract, treatment, outcome, controversies, and future directions. Gulay Alper: neuroimaging features, differential diagnosis, investigations and workup, tables, figures. Keith van Haren: CSF findings, differential diagnosis, investigations and workup, tables. Andrew Kornberg: epidemiology, differential diagnosis, investigations, and workup. Claudia Lucchinetti: pathology. Silvia Tenembaum: definitions, clinical presentation. Anita L. Belman: introduction. All authors contributed extensively to the editing and consensus-finding process of all sections of the manuscript.

STUDY FUNDING

This supplement is made possible by funding from the MS Cure Fund, Danish MS Society, German MS Society, Italian MS Association, MS International Federation, MS Research Foundation (Netherlands), National MS Society (USA) and Swiss MS Society.

DISCLOSURE

D. Pohl, G. Alper, and K. van Haren report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. A. Kornberg: PI on 2 pediatric MS trials sponsored by Novartis and Sanofi, travel support for educational meetings as a speaker by CSL Bioplasma, Novartis, and Biogen-Idec, served on an advisory board for pediatric MS trials with Biogen-Idec. C. Lucchinetti: received research support from the Department of Defense (W81XWH-13-1-0098), the NIH (NS49577-R01), Novartis, Biogen, Alexion, and Sanofi. She may accrue revenue for a patent re: Aquaporin-4-associated antibodies for diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica and receives royalties from the publication of Blue Books of Neurology: MS 3 (Saunders Elsevier, 2010). S. Tenembaum served as an advisory board member or speaker for Merck Serono. Professional travel/accommodations expenses have been awarded to Dr. Tenembaum by Merck-Serono. She serves on a clinical trial advisory board for Genzyme-Sanofi. A. Belman: one time advisory board participant for Biogen. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

  • Received August 19, 2015.
  • Accepted in final form January 26, 2016.
  • © 2016 American Academy of Neurology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lucas J
    . An account of uncommon symptoms succeeding measles: with some additional remarks on the infection of measles and smallpox. Lond Med J 1790;11:325.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. McAlpine D
    . Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: its sequelea and its relationship to disseminated sclerosis. Lancet 1931;217:846–852.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Gibbons JL,
    2. Miller HG,
    3. Stanton JB
    . Para-infectious encephalomyelitis and related syndromes; a critical review of the neurological complications of certain specific fevers. Q J Med 1956;25:427–505.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Absoud M,
    2. Lim MJ,
    3. Chong WK, et al.
    Paediatric acquired demyelinating syndromes: incidence, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features. Mult Scler 2013;19:76–86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Banwell B,
    2. Kennedy J,
    3. Sadovnick D, et al.
    Incidence of acquired demyelination of the CNS in Canadian children. Neurology 2009;72:232–239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Krupp LB,
    2. Banwell B,
    3. Tenembaum S
    . Consensus definitions proposed for pediatric multiple sclerosis and related disorders. Neurology 2007;68(suppl 2):S7–S12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Krupp LB,
    2. Tardieu M,
    3. Amato MP, et al.
    International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group criteria for pediatric multiple sclerosis and immune-mediated central nervous system demyelinating disorders: revisions to the 2007 definitions. Mult Scler 2013;19:1261–1267.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Polman CH,
    2. Reingold SC,
    3. Banwell B, et al.
    Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011;69:292–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wingerchuk DM,
    2. Banwell B,
    3. Bennett JL, et al.
    International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology 2015;85:177–189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Huppke P,
    2. Rostasy K,
    3. Karenfort M, et al.
    Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis followed by recurrent or monophasic optic neuritis in pediatric patients. Mult Scler 2013;19:941–946.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mikaeloff Y,
    2. Caridade G,
    3. Husson B,
    4. Suissa S,
    5. Tardieu M
    . Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis cohort study: prognostic factors for relapse. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2007;11:90–95.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Banwell B,
    2. Tenembaum S,
    3. Lennon VA, et al.
    Neuromyelitis optica-IgG in childhood inflammatory demyelinating CNS disorders. Neurology 2008;70:344–352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hacohen Y,
    2. Absoud M,
    3. Deiva K, et al.
    Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies are associated with a non-MS course in children. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2015;2:e81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ketelslegers IA,
    2. Van Pelt DE,
    3. Bryde S, et al.
    Anti-MOG antibodies plead against MS diagnosis in an acquired demyelinating syndromes cohort. Mult Scler 2015;21:1513–1520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Baumann M,
    2. Sahin K,
    3. Lechner C, et al.
    Clinical and neuroradiological differences of paediatric acute disseminating encephalomyelitis with and without antibodies to the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015;86:265–272.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Torisu H,
    2. Kira R,
    3. Ishizaki Y, et al.
    Clinical study of childhood acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, multiple sclerosis, and acute transverse myelitis in Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan. Brain Dev 2010;32:454–462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Xiong CH,
    2. Yan Y,
    3. Liao Z, et al.
    Epidemiological characteristics of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in Nanchang, China: a retrospective study. BMC Public Health 2014;14:111.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Pohl D,
    2. Hennemuth I,
    3. von Kries R,
    4. Hanefeld F
    . Paediatric multiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in Germany: results of a nationwide survey. Eur J Pediatr 2007;166:405–412.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Pellegrino P,
    2. Radice S,
    3. Clementi E
    . Geoepidemiology of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Epidemiology 2014;25:928–929.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Tenembaum S,
    2. Chamoles N,
    3. Fejerman N
    . Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: a long-term follow-up study of 84 pediatric patients. Neurology 2002;59:1224–1231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Karussis D,
    2. Petrou P
    . The spectrum of post-vaccination inflammatory CNS demyelinating syndromes. Autoimmun Rev 2014;13:215–224.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Young NP,
    2. Weinshenker BG,
    3. Parisi JE, et al.
    Perivenous demyelination: association with clinically defined acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and comparison with pathologically confirmed multiple sclerosis. Brain 2010;133:333–348.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Robinson CA,
    2. Adiele RC,
    3. Tham M,
    4. Lucchinetti CF,
    5. Popescu BF
    . Early and widespread injury of astrocytes in the absence of demyelination in acute haemorrhagic leukoencephalitis. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2014;2:52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Absoud M,
    2. Parslow RC,
    3. Wassmer E, et al.
    Severe acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: a paediatric intensive care population-based study. Mult Scler 2011;17:1258–1261.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ketelslegers IA,
    2. Visser IE,
    3. Neuteboom RF,
    4. Boon M,
    5. Catsman-Berrevoets CE,
    6. Hintzen RQ
    . Disease course and outcome of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis is more severe in adults than in children. Mult Scler 2011;17:441–448.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Tenembaum S,
    2. Chitnis T,
    3. Ness J,
    4. Hahn JS
    . Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Neurology 2007;68(suppl 2):S23–S36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Adamovic T,
    2. Riou EM,
    3. Bernard G, et al.
    Acute combined central and peripheral nervous system demyelination in children. Pediatr Neurol 2008;39:307–316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ravaglia S,
    2. Tavazzi E,
    3. Moglia A,
    4. Ceroni M,
    5. Marchioni E
    . Combined central and peripheral demyelination: comparison of adult and pediatric series. Pediatr Neurol 2009;41:77–78.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Wassmer E,
    2. Whitehouse WP
    . Simultaneous peripheral and central demyelination. J Child Neurol 2008;23:1495–1496.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Bernard G,
    2. Riou E,
    3. Rosenblatt B,
    4. Dilenge ME,
    5. Poulin C
    . Simultaneous Guillain-Barre syndrome and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in the pediatric population. J Child Neurol 2008;23:752–757.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Kawamura N,
    2. Yamasaki R,
    3. Yonekawa T, et al.
    Anti-neurofascin antibody in patients with combined central and peripheral demyelination. Neurology 2013;81:714–722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kim GH,
    2. Kim KM,
    3. Suh SI,
    4. Ki CS,
    5. Eun BL
    . Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease masquerading as acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis-like illness. Pediatrics 2014;134:e270–e273.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Atzori M,
    2. Battistella PA,
    3. Perini P, et al.
    Clinical and diagnostic aspects of multiple sclerosis and acute monophasic encephalomyelitis in pediatric patients: a single centre prospective study. Mult Scler 2009;15:363–370.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Alper G,
    2. Heyman R,
    3. Wang L
    . Multiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis diagnosed in children after long-term follow-up: comparison of presenting features. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009;51:480–486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Callen DJ,
    2. Shroff MM,
    3. Branson HM, et al.
    Role of MRI in the differentiation of ADEM from MS in children. Neurology 2009;72:968–973.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Verhey LH,
    2. Branson HM,
    3. Shroff MM, et al.
    MRI parameters for prediction of multiple sclerosis diagnosis in children with acute CNS demyelination: a prospective national cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:1065–1073.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Donmez FY,
    2. Aslan H,
    3. Coskun M
    . Evaluation of possible prognostic factors of fulminant acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) on magnetic resonance imaging with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and diffusion-weighted imaging. Acta Radiol 2009;50:334–339.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Balasubramanya KS,
    2. Kovoor JM,
    3. Jayakumar PN, et al.
    Diffusion-weighted imaging and proton MR spectroscopy in the characterization of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Neuroradiology 2007;49:177–183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Zuccoli G,
    2. Panigrahy A,
    3. Sreedher G, et al.
    Vasogenic edema characterizes pediatric acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Neuroradiology 2014;56:679–684.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Bizzi A,
    2. Ulug AM,
    3. Crawford TO, et al.
    Quantitative proton MR spectroscopic imaging in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1125–1130.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Inglese M,
    2. Salvi F,
    3. Iannucci G,
    4. Mancardi GL,
    5. Mascalchi M,
    6. Filippi M
    . Magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor MR imaging of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:267–272.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Pavone P,
    2. Pettoello-Mantovano M,
    3. Le PA, et al.
    Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: a long-term prospective study and meta-analysis. Neuropediatrics 2010;41:246–255.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Erol I,
    2. Ozkale Y,
    3. Alkan O,
    4. Alehan F
    . Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children and adolescents: a single center experience. Pediatr Neurol 2013;49:266–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Hung PC,
    2. Wang HS,
    3. Chou ML,
    4. Lin KL,
    5. Hsieh MY,
    6. Wong AM
    . Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children: a single institution experience of 28 patients. Neuropediatrics 2012;43:64–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Leake JA,
    2. Albani S,
    3. Kao AS, et al.
    Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in childhood: epidemiologic, clinical and laboratory features. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:756–764.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Franciotta D,
    2. Columba-Cabezas S,
    3. Andreoni L, et al.
    Oligoclonal IgG band patterns in inflammatory demyelinating human and mouse diseases. J Neuroimmunol 2008;200:125–128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Pohl D,
    2. Tenembaum S
    . Treatment of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2012;14:264–275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Waldman AT,
    2. Gorman MP,
    3. Rensel MR,
    4. Austin TE,
    5. Hertz DP,
    6. Kuntz NL
    . Management of pediatric central nervous system demyelinating disorders: consensus of United States neurologists. J Child Neurol 2011;26:675–682.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Dale RC,
    2. de SC,
    3. Chong WK,
    4. Cox TC,
    5. Harding B,
    6. Neville BG
    . Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, multiphasic disseminated encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis in children. Brain 2000;12:2407–2422.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    1. Pradhan S,
    2. Gupta RP,
    3. Shashank S,
    4. Pandey N
    . Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. J Neurol Sci 1999;165:56–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Nishikawa M,
    2. Ichiyama T,
    3. Hayashi T,
    4. Ouchi K,
    5. Furukawa S
    . Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Pediatr Neurol 1999;21:583–586.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Miyamoto K,
    2. Kozu S,
    3. Arakawa A, et al.
    Therapeutic hypothermia with the use of intracranial pressure monitoring for acute disseminated encephalomyelitis with brainstem lesion: a case report. J Child Neurol 2014;29:NP69–NP73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Granget E,
    2. Milh M,
    3. Pech-Gourg G, et al.
    Life-saving decompressive craniectomy for acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in a child: a case report. Childs Nerv Syst 2012;28:1121–1124.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Tenembaum SN
    . Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Handb Clin Neurol 2013;112:1253–1262.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Jacobs RK,
    2. Anderson VA,
    3. Neale JL,
    4. Shield LK,
    5. Kornberg AJ
    . Neuropsychological outcome after acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: impact of age at illness onset. Pediatr Neurol 2004;31:191–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Suppiej A,
    2. Cainelli E,
    3. Casara G,
    4. Cappellari A,
    5. Nosadini M,
    6. Sartori S
    . Long-term neurocognitive outcome and quality of life in pediatric acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Pediatr Neurol 2014;50:363–367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • GLOSSARY
    • DEFINITIONS
    • EPIDEMIOLOGY
    • PATHOLOGY
    • CLINICAL PRESENTATION
    • NEUROIMAGING FEATURES
    • CSF FINDINGS
    • DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS, INVESTIGATIONS, AND WORKUP
    • TREATMENT
    • OUTCOME
    • CONTROVERSIES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • STUDY FUNDING
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations A Clinical and Genetic Study

Dr. Robert Shapiro and Dr. Amynah Pradhan

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All Pediatric
  • All Demyelinating disease (CNS)
  • Autoimmune diseases
  • Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
  • Post-infectious

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 100 (5)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise