Effect of informed consent on patient characteristics in a stroke thrombolysis trial
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the manner of consent, i.e., informed consent by patients themselves or informed consent by proxy, affects clinical characteristics of samples of acute stroke patients enrolled in clinical trials.
Methods: We analyzed the manner of obtaining informed consent in the first 1,005 patients from WAKE-UP, an investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of MRI-based thrombolysis in stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset running in 6 European countries. Patients providing informed consent by themselves were compared with patients enrolled by proxy consent. Baseline clinical measures were compared between groups.
Results: In 359 (35.7%) patients, informed consent was by proxy. Patients with proxy consent were older (median 71 vs 66 years, p < 0.0001) and had a higher frequency of arterial hypertension (58.2% vs 43.4%, p < 0.0001). They showed higher scores on the NIH Stroke Scale (median 11 vs 5, p < 0.0001) and more frequently aphasia (73.7% vs 20.0%, p < 0.0001). The rate of proxy consent varied among countries (p < 0.0001), ranging from 77.1% in Spain to 1.2% in Denmark.
Conclusions: Patients recruited by proxy consent were older, had more severe strokes, and had higher prevalence of aphasia than those with capacity to give personal consent. Variations in the manner of consent across countries may influence trial results.
Clinicaltrials.gov and Clinicaltrialsregister.eu identifiers: NCT01525290 (clinicaltrials.gov); 2011-005906-32 (clinicaltrialsregister.eu).
GLOSSARY
- DWI=
- diffusion-weighted imaging;
- FLAIR=
- fluid-attenuated inversion recovery;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- NIHSS=
- NIH Stroke Scale
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article. The Article Processing Charge was funded by the European Commission.
- Received December 21, 2016.
- Accepted in final form June 19, 2017.
- Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Stroke thrombolysis: Informed consent in a cohort with grave prognosis
- Vinod K. Gupta, Physician/Director, Migraine-Headache Institute, New Delhi, India[email protected]
Submitted November 08, 2017 - Comparative validity and implication of informed consent vs proxy and surrogate consent in therapeutic intervention research studies
- Guru Dutta Satyarthee, Associate Professor, All India Instute of Medical sciences , New Delhi, India[email protected]
Submitted October 23, 2017
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
IV thrombolysis in very severe and severe ischemic strokeResults from the SITS-ISTR RegistryMichael V. Mazya, Kennedy R. Lees, David Collas et al.Neurology, November 06, 2015 -
Article
Multimodal CT or MRI for IV thrombolysis in ischemic stroke with unknown time of onsetKosmas Macha, Philip Hoelter, Gabriela Siedler et al.Neurology, October 21, 2020 -
Article
Sex as a predictor of outcomes in patients treated with thrombolysis for acute strokeM.S.V. Elkind, S. Prabhakaran, J. Pittman et al.Neurology, March 12, 2007 -
Article
Safety of IV thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke related to Chagas diseasePedro Telles Cougo-Pinto, Bruno Lopes dos Santos, Francisco Antunes Dias et al.Neurology, October 04, 2013