Benefit of dual-energy CT iodine overlay technique for T1-hyperintense brain lesion
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

A 47-year-old woman was admitted for radiation therapy of a left frontal glioblastoma, resected 2 months prior. On enhanced MRI, it was difficult to identify the tumor enhancement due to intrinsic T1 hyperintensity, possibly related to postoperative hemorrhage1 (figure, A–C). However, the iodine overlay image derived from the dual-energy CT technique (figure, D) was revealing: subsequent surgical resection confirmed residual tumor cells along the region that showed the elevated iodine concentration (figure, E). The dual-energy CT iodine overlay technique may be particularly useful in the evaluation of a T1-hyperintense lesion.2
Because the signal intensity at the previous resection site is hyperintense on precontrast T1 image (A) due to hemorrhage (B; T2* gradient recalled echo), it is difficult to identify the tumoral enhancement (C; postcontrast T1). However, dual-energy CT iodine-overlay image (D) reveals the previously undetectable enhancement along the periphery. Biopsy was consistent with glioblastoma multiforme (E; hematoxylin & eosin, ×200).
Footnotes
Author contributions: Y. Lee, H. Seo, B.-K. Je, S.-D. Kim, and H. Oh were involved in the neurologic patient care and analysis and interpretation of clinical results and data. Y. Lee drafted the manuscript. H. Seo, S.-D. Kim, B.-K. Je, and H. Oh revised the manuscript.
Study funding: No targeted funding reported.
Disclosure: The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.
- © 2017 American Academy of Neurology
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- Yamauchi H,
- Buehler M,
- Goodsitt MM,
- Keshavarzi N,
- Srinivasan A
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
T2-FLAIR mismatch in isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant astrocytomasVariability and evolutionPatrick Throckmorton, Jerome J. Graber et al.Neurology, July 20, 2020 -
Article
Sustained focal antitumor activity of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastomaOliver Bähr, Patrick N. Harter, Lutz M. Weise et al.Neurology, June 13, 2014 -
Articles
11C-methionine PET for differential diagnosis of low-grade gliomasK. Herholz, T. Hölzer, B. Bauer et al.Neurology, May 01, 1998 -
Article
Postoperative follow-up for selected diffuse low-grade gliomas with WHO grade III/IV fociAmélie Darlix, Valérie Rigau, Julien Fraisse et al.Neurology, January 22, 2020