This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective We sought to better understand the reasons for increasing prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) by studying prevalence in relation to incidence, mortality rates, sex ratio, and geographic distribution of cases.
Methods We identified MS cases from 1996 to 2013 in Ontario, Canada, by applying a validated algorithm to health administrative data. We calculated age- and sex-standardized prevalence and incidence rates for the province and by census division. Incidence and prevalence sex ratios for women to men were computed.
Results The prevalence of MS increased by 69% from 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54–1.59) per 1,000 in 1996 (n = 12,155) to 2.65 (95% CI: 2.62–2.68) in 2013 (n = 28,192). Incidence remained relatively stable except for a spike in 2010, followed by a subsequent decline in 2011–2013, particularly among young people and men. Mortality decreased by 33% from 26.7 (95% CI: 23.5–30.3) per 1,000 to 18.0 (95% CI: 16.4–19.8) per 1,000. The incidence sex ratio was stable from 1996 to 2009, then declined in 2010, with partial rebound by 2013. MS prevalence and incidence showed no consistent association with latitude.
Conclusion In this large, population-based MS cohort, we found stable incidence and increasing prevalence of MS; the latter largely reflected declining mortality. A spike in incidence in 2010 among younger patients and men at a time of widespread media coverage of MS suggests that these groups may be vulnerable to delayed diagnosis. We did not find a latitudinal gradient; however, most Ontarians live between the 42nd and 46th parallels, reducing our ability to detect an effect of latitude.
Glossary
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- ICD=
- International Classification of Diseases;
- MS=
- multiple sclerosis;
- OHIP=
- Ontario Health Insurance Plan
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article
- Received August 28, 2017.
- Accepted in final form January 16, 2018.
- © 2018 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.