Early time course of major bleeding on antiplatelet therapy after TIA or ischemic stroke
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective To study the early time course of major bleeding and its subtypes in patients with cerebral ischemia on dual and single antiplatelet therapy.
Methods We performed a post hoc analysis on individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials (Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events [CAPRIE], Second European Stroke Prevention Study [ESPS-2], Management of Atherothrombosis With Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients [MATCH], Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance [CHARISMA], European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial [ESPRIT], and Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes [PRoFESS]) including 45,195 patients with a TIA or noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. We studied incidence rates of bleeding per antiplatelet regimen stratified by time from randomization (≤30, 31–90, 91–180, 181–365, >365 days). We calculated incidence rates per trial and pooled estimates with random-effects meta-analysis. We performed Poisson regression to assess differences between time periods with adjustment for age and sex.
Results The incidence of major bleeding on aspirin plus clopidogrel and aspirin plus -dipyridamole was highest in the first 30 days, 5.8 and 4.9 per 100 person-years, respectively, and was significantly higher than at 31 to 90 days (rate ratio 1.98, 95% confidence interval 1.16–3.40 for aspirin plus clopidogrel; rate ratio 1.94, 95% confidence interval 1.24–3.03 for aspirin plus dipyridamole). Incidence rates on aspirin and clopidogrel monotherapy were 2.8 and 2.5 per 100 person-years, respectively, in the first 30 days, with no significant change over time. The time course was similar for gastrointestinal bleeds. There was no early excess of intracranial hemorrhage in patients on either dual or single antiplatelet therapy.
Conclusion Dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with high early risks of major and gastrointestinal bleeding that decline after the first month in trial cohorts.
Glossary
- CAPRIE=
- Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events;
- CHANCE=
- Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events;
- CHARISMA=
- Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- ESPRIT=
- European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial;
- ESPS-2=
- Second European Stroke Prevention Study;
- EXPRESS=
- Effect of Urgent Treatment of Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke on early Recurrent Stroke;
- FASTER=
- Fast Assessment of Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack to Prevent Early Recurrence;
- MATCH=
- Management of Atherothrombosis With Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients;
- PRoFESS=
- Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes;
- RR=
- rate ratio;
- SPS3=
- Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes Trial;
- TARDIS=
- Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency in Ischaemic Stroke
Antiplatelet drugs are widely applied in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Although they successfully reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events,1 antiplatelet drugs are associated with a small but relevant risk of serious bleeding,1 which is reported to vary between 1%/y and 1.5%/y.2,3 The prognosis of patients who have experienced a bleeding event is worse, with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.4 Given the wide application of antiplatelet therapy and consequences of bleeding events, it is important to gain more insight into the safety of antiplatelet agents.
It has been shown previously that the excess risk of major bleeding on aspirin compared with placebo falls with time in primary prevention trials, driven mainly by an excess early risk of bleeding on aspirin.5 It is uncertain whether the time course would be the same in the secondary prevention of cerebral ischemia. In addition, it is unknown whether the time course differs for dual antiplatelet therapy, which is known to be associated with higher risks of bleeding than monotherapy.6,7 Indeed, there is some preliminary evidence of a high early risk of bleeding on dual antiplatelet treatment after TIA and minor stroke, particularly among aspirin-naive patients,8 but larger studies are required. We aimed to study the time course of major bleeding events and their subtypes in patients with cerebral ischemia on dual and single antiplatelet therapy.
Methods
Study population
We analyzed individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials (Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events [CAPRIE], Second European Stroke Prevention Study [ESPS-2], Management of Atherothrombosis With Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients [MATCH], Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance [CHARISMA], European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischaemia Trial [ESPRIT], and Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes [PRoFESS]6,7,9,–,12) investigating the efficacy of antiplatelet agents in patients with a TIA or ischemic stroke. Details of the individual patient data meta-analysis have been described previously.13 In total, 48,023 patients with cerebral ischemia were included in the trials between 1989 and 2006. Details of the included trials are presented in table 1. Aspirin was studied in 4 trials (CAPRIE, ESPS-2, CHARISMA, and ESPRIT), clopidogrel was studied in 3 (CAPRIE, MATCH, and PRoFESS), aspirin in combination with (extended-release) dipyridamole was examined in 3 (ESPS-2, ESPRIT, and PRoFESS), and aspirin in combination with clopidogrel was assessed in 2 (MATCH and CHARISMA). The ESPS-2 trial had 4 arms and randomized patients to aspirin, aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole, extended-release dipyridamole only, or placebo. Median follow-up ranged from 1.4 to 3.5 years.
Overview of included trials
We excluded patients with a possible cardioembolic origin of their stroke (those with a history of atrial fibrillation or Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification of cardioembolic stroke). We used trial-specific definitions for major bleeding. Major bleeding events included bleedings that were fatal, intracranial, or significantly disabling or required hospital admission. Intracranial bleeding events included intracerebral hemorrhages, subarachnoid hemorrhages, and subdural and epidural hematomas. Hemorrhagic transformations of ischemic strokes were not counted as intracranial hemorrhages. Gastrointestinal bleeding events included upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeds that were fatal or required hospital admission.
Statistical analysis
We restricted our analyses to patients who were on treatment. For patients who permanently discontinued trial medication, on-treatment time was defined as time until last intake of study drugs plus 28 days. For patients who completed the trial, on-treatment time was the same as intention-to-treat time. We calculated incidence rates of bleeding per antiplatelet regimen stratified by time from randomization (≤30, 31–90, 91–180, 181–365, and >365 days). Incidence rates were calculated for each trial separately and were subsequently pooled per antiplatelet regimen with random-effects meta-analysis. We performed Poisson regression analysis to quantify the difference between time periods with adjustment for age and sex. Rate ratios were calculated per trial and subsequently pooled per antiplatelet regimen with random-effects meta-analysis. The time period of 31 to 90 days was chosen as the reference category in all analyses. We examined the influence of age and prior antiplatelet drug use on the time course of bleeding by performing stratified analyses. Definitions of prior antiplatelet drug use varied considerably across trials; therefore, we used prior vascular disease as a proxy for long-term prior antiplatelet drug use, which we defined as a medical history of stroke, TIA, myocardial infarction, angina, or peripheral artery disease. All analyses were performed with R version 3.2.2.
Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patients consents
The trials were approved by the ethics committee or institutional review board at each participating center, and all patients gave written informed consent.
Results
After the exclusion of patients with a possible cardioembolic stroke (n = 1,829) and patients who permanently discontinued treatment but for whom the date of last intake was unknown (n = 999; rate of major bleeding 0.8 per 100 person-years), 45,195 patients remained for the analysis. During 82,199 person-years of follow-up, 1,338 major bleedings, 324 intracranial bleedings, and 618 gastrointestinal bleedings occurred. Baseline characteristics of patients are presented in table 2.
Baseline characteristics of 45,195 patients included in the analyses
The time course of major bleeding per antiplatelet regimen is displayed in figure 1. The risk of major bleeding was highest during the first 30 days for all antiplatelet regimens except for dipyridamole only. The incidence rate was 2.8 per 100 person-years for aspirin, 2.5 per 100 person-years for clopidogrel, 4.9 per 100 person-years for aspirin plus dipyridamole, and 5.8 per 100 person-years for aspirin plus clopidogrel (figure e-1, http://links.lww.com/WNL/A167). Results per trial are shown in figures e-2 through e-6. In patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, the risk of major bleeding was significantly higher in the first 30 days compared with 31 to 90 days (rate ratio [RR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16–3.40 for aspirin plus clopidogrel; RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24–3.03 for aspirin plus dipyridamole, table 3). No significant change over time was seen for single antiplatelet regimens (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.69–2.37 for aspirin; RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.66–2.48 for clopidogrel; and RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.12–4.44 for dipyridamole, table 3). The same patterns were seen for gastrointestinal bleeds (figure 2A). Risk of intracranial hemorrhage was stable over time (figure 2B and table e-1, http://links.lww.com/WNL/A168). Pooled incidence rates of gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding per antiplatelet regimen are presented in figures e-7 and e-8.
(A) Single antiplatelet therapy (APT), (B) dual APT, and (C) dipyridamole and placebo.
Adjusted rate ratios (95% confidence interval) for major bleeding
APT = antiplatelet therapy.
Among elderly patients (age ≥65 years), absolute risks of major bleeding were higher. The time course of the risk of bleeding was comparable for younger and older patients (figure e-9, http://links.lww.com/WNL/A167). A total of 17,909 patients (40%) had a diagnosis of vascular disease before their presenting event. Patterns of bleeding risk over time were essentially similar for patients with and without prior vascular disease (figure e-10).
Discussion
Our study showed high early risks of major bleeding and, more specifically, gastrointestinal bleeding on dual antiplatelet therapy that decline over time. There was no early excess risk of intracranial hemorrhages among patients on either dual antiplatelet therapy or monotherapy.
Multiple trials have shown the increased risk of major bleeding associated with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy after stroke: MATCH, CHARISMA, and Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes Trial (SPS3) demonstrated that aspirin plus clopidogrel is associated with statistically significant higher bleeding risks than either of the regimens separately.6,7,14 Furthermore, the PRoFESS trial showed that aspirin plus dipyridamole led to more major and intracranial bleedings than clopidogrel monotherapy.12 Recent trials have investigated the benefit of a short course of aspirin plus clopidogrel, aiming to reduce the risk of early recurrent strokes without exposing patients to long-term dual antiplatelet treatment. Combination therapy was shown to be more protective against ischemic events than monotherapy, but results regarding risk of bleeding in the early phase were conflicting.15,16 While the Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial showed similar risks of bleeding among both groups,15 the Fast Assessment of Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack to Prevent Early Recurrence (FASTER) trial showed a significantly higher risk of symptomatic and asymptomatic bleeds among patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy.16 The recent Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency in Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial compared short-term triple therapy (aspirin plus dipyridamole plus clopidogrel) with guideline-based therapy and found no net clinical benefit due to an excess of bleeding complications with triple antiplatelet therapy.17
Evidence for a time course of bleeding risk is scarce. Post hoc analyses on data from CHARISMA showed that the excess risk of bleeding on aspirin plus clopidogrel was greatest in the first year and similar to aspirin thereafter.18,19 This is in line with our results indicating high early risks on dual antiplatelet therapy that decline over time. Results from this study and ours suggest that some form of resistance to antiplatelet drugs occurs over time. Previous studies investigating platelet response over time have shown conflicting results. Some reported stable platelet reactivity,20 while others showed decreased platelet inhibition after the first months of exposure to both aspirin and clopidogrel.21,–,23 The mechanisms that cause this reduced sensitivity over time remain unclear. Possibly, upregulation of other pathways that mediate platelet aggregation may play a role. Our findings may also suggest that patients who are prone to bleeding experience a bleed shortly after the start of treatment, leaving a cohort that is at relatively lower risk. Alternatively, the high early risk may be explained partly by the natural history of bleeds as suggested by the time course in placebo-treated patients. However, the number of bleeds in the placebo group was small, and analyses of other data sources are required to better understand the natural history of bleeding after stroke.
High bleeding risks on aspirin plus clopidogrel have been reported previously and are a cause for concern. A post hoc analysis on data from the Effect of Urgent Treatment of Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke on early Recurrent Stroke (EXPRESS) study and FASTER pilot trial showed excessive risks during the first 90 days, particularly among aspirin-naive patients.8 Whether the risk decreased over time was not investigated. The high observed risks were attributed partly to the fact that patients were vulnerable shortly after their TIA or ischemic stroke. However, our data show that after the acute phase of TIA or stroke, initiation of dual antiplatelet therapy is accompanied by a doubling of risk in the first 30 days.
Our study addresses the time course of gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding separately. The finding that aggressive antiplatelet therapy has a more pronounced effect on gastrointestinal bleeding is plausible because patients with inherited and acquired platelet disorders often present with mucocutaneous bleeding patterns.24
A strength of our study is the large sample size with a large number of bleeding events. In addition, the quality of the data was high, with regular follow-up and adjudication of events by an independent committee. Furthermore, we were able to restrict our analysis to patients who were on treatment, thereby reducing the possibility that our findings reflect poor compliance. Our study also has limitations. First, we did not have data on other antiplatelet agents such as cilostazol, terutroban, or triflusal. However, the antiplatelet drugs investigated in our study are those recommended as first-line agents in current guidelines.25,26 Second, absolute risks of bleeding may have been underestimated because patients at highest bleeding risk were excluded from the trials. It is also possible that the time course of bleeding risk might differ in older or frailer populations. Third, control of medication intake was not performed in all trials; therefore, we cannot exclude that patients who were included in the on-treatment analyses in reality did not take their medication anymore. Finally, we performed a post hoc analysis on trial data, and although adjustment for age and sex did not change the results, the possibility of residual confounding remains.
The risk of major bleeding and, more specifically, gastrointestinal bleeding is increased 2-fold in the first month on dual antiplatelet treatment. The risk of intracranial hemorrhage is stable over time. Although the risk of early recurrent ischemic events will likely outweigh the risk of bleeding, our findings draw attention to the high early risks of bleeding associated with dual antiplatelet therapy, which may have previously been underestimated. The high early risks may warrant the initiation of gastroprotective agents in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, as well as close monitoring of patients in the early phase.
Author contributions
N.A.H. did the statistical analysis, wrote the first draft of the article, and was supervised by J.P.G., N.A.H., A.A., L.J.K., P.M.R., and J.P.G. made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, data analysis, and interpretation of data; they also contributed to drafting of the article and its critical revision for important intellectual content. P.M.B. and L.C. were involved in data collection, interpretation of the data, and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. J.P.G. had the final responsibility for the analyses and the content of the article.
Study funding
Dr. J.P. Greving and Dr N.A. Hilkens are supported by a grant from the Dutch Heart Foundation (grant 2013T128). Dr. Greving is also supported by a VENI grant from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), grant 916.11.129.
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the ESPRIT Steering Committee for providing access to the ESPRIT data and Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb for giving access to the databases of CAPRIE, MATCH, and CHARISMA. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc supported this work by providing access to the clinical trial databases of ESPS-2 and PRoFESS.
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Coinvestigators are listed at http://links.lww.com/WNL/A169.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by Utrecht University.
- Received July 7, 2017.
- Accepted in final form November 14, 2017.
- © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
References
- 1.↵
- Baigent C,
- Blackwell L, et al
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- Alberts MJ,
- Bhatt DL,
- Smith SC Jr., et al
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- Halkes PH,
- van Gijn J,
- Kappelle LJ,
- Koudstaal PJ,
- Algra A
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- Bath PM,
- Woodhouse LJ,
- Flaherty K,
- Havard D,
- England TJ,
- Sprigg N
- 18.↵
- Berger PB,
- Bhatt DL,
- Fuster V, et al
- 19.↵
- Bhatt DL,
- Flather MD,
- Hacke W, et al
- 20.↵
- Saw J,
- Madsen EH,
- Chan S,
- Maurer-Spurej E
- 21.↵
- Helgason CM,
- Bolin KM,
- Hoff JA, et al
- 22.↵
- Nuhrenberg TG,
- Stratz C,
- Leggewie S, et al
- 23.↵
- Pulcinelli FM,
- Pignatelli P,
- Celestini A,
- Riondino S,
- Gazzaniga PP,
- Violi F
- 24.↵
- Hassan AA,
- Kroll MH
- 25.↵
- Kernan WN,
- Ovbiagele B,
- Black HR, et al
- 26.↵
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.