Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • COVID-19
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • COVID-19
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

September 11, 2018; 91 (11) Resident & Fellow Section

Education Research: A framework for global health curricula for neurology trainees

Anindita Deb, Melissa Fischer, Anna DePold Hohler
First published September 10, 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006155
Anindita Deb
From the Departments of Neurology (A.D.) and Medicine (M.F.), University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester; and Department of Neurology (A.D.H.), Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Brighton, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa Fischer
From the Departments of Neurology (A.D.) and Medicine (M.F.), University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester; and Department of Neurology (A.D.H.), Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Brighton, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna DePold Hohler
From the Departments of Neurology (A.D.) and Medicine (M.F.), University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester; and Department of Neurology (A.D.H.), Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Brighton, MA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Education Research: A framework for global health curricula for neurology trainees
Anindita Deb, Melissa Fischer, Anna DePold Hohler
Neurology Sep 2018, 91 (11) 528-532; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006155

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
396

Share

  • Article
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

As the global burden of neurologic disease increases, educating future neurologists about the principles of global health through global health curricula is of utmost importance. However, few neurology residency training programs have developed and implemented comprehensive global health curricula. This report outlines the design, implementation, and evaluation of the University of Massachusetts Medical School neurology residency global health curriculum. Using accepted curriculum development methods and incorporating an innovative use of technology, we created a global health curriculum focused on neurology to engage trainees. The implementation of curricula and organization of elective opportunities also incorporates learning objectives and an evaluation process. The University of Massachusetts Medical School neurology global health curriculum can be used as a framework for other residency programs developing global health programs. Global health education increases young neurologists' awareness of the growing burden of neurologic disease and, subsequently, may motivate them to address the need for neurologic expertise around the world.

Glossary

ACGME=
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education;
AHC=
academic health center;
ASPPH=
Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health;
CAM=
Charutar Arogya Mandal;
PGY=
postgraduate year;
UMMS=
University of Massachusetts Medical School

In an increasingly interconnected world, health issues are no longer confined to specific geographical regions. To prepare physicians for the challenges posed by globalization, there has been a growing interest in incorporating global health topics into medical student and resident education.1 Approximately one-third of US and Canadian neurology training programs offer global health electives. Multiple studies have shown that participation in international electives increases interest in pursuing practice in underserved areas and with diverse patient populations both in the United States and abroad.2

The University of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS) Department of Neurology recognized the importance of a global health curriculum for residents. Development of the curriculum involved a comprehensive needs assessment, identifying goals and objectives, partnering with a global site, implementation with the incorporation of technology, and curriculum evaluation. The lessons learned in this process are shared to guide others in developing a global health program.

A comprehensive global health curriculum meets competencies expected of neurology trainees, and incorporates global health principles while allowing for exchange of ideas with a global site. Although a lack of funding can hinder travel, technological innovations allow for new approaches to collaboration from afar. Global collaborations increase trainees' exposure to region-specific neurologic diseases, opportunities for population-based research, and understanding of diagnostic and treatment options in resource-limited settings.

Needs assessment

Assessing for institutional need

The neurology department leadership at the UMMS recognized the value of a pilot global health program to enhance resident training and support skills development. The department provided protected time for curriculum development and implementation. A needs assessment included discussions with key stakeholders, neurology residency program director, and the chief residents to gauge interest and determine goals. During the pilot phase, various scheduling options were considered. Given the demanding schedules of the residents, global health modules were integrated into the existing lecture schedule.

Identifying resources

An increasing number of resources exist to support new global health program development. Developing Global Health Programming: A Guidebook for Medical and Professional Schools by Jessica Evert et al.3 is a comprehensive review of objectives of global health education, development strategies, and medical education competencies. Also, Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach provides a practical way to develop curricula.4 Global Health 101 is a popular reference used by many global health programs including UMMS.5 In addition, the Consortium of Universities for Global Health provides slides on a variety of global health topics.

There is limited literature on formal global neurology education and track development. One experience outlines the development of a track incorporating global and community health emphasizing the need for mentored longitudinal experiences, scholarly projects, and participation in global health academics. Residents in this particular track have a mentored experience abroad for at least 3 weeks, participate in community clinics, develop a project, and attend at least 2 nonneurology global health lectures per year.6 Another example, the Global Health Track at Yale University, offers global health coursework, scholarly work, and international electives in Uganda and the Czech Republic. Some residency programs offer a concurrent certification in public health. The global health program in pediatrics at the University of Minnesota offers certification through the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in addition to collaboration with the Makerere University in Uganda.10 Long-standing programs, such as Yale University's Internal Medicine International Health Program, often receive funding support through the department.7 The UMMS program has similar requirements to the programs described above but unique in its neurology-focused global health curricula integrated into the residency didactics, and use of videoconferencing to enhance bidirectional exchange and foster collaboration year-round.

Identifying mentors

Development of a novel global health curriculum requires identification of mentors with expertise in neurology, medical education, and global health. Dr. Anna DePold Hohler, MD, FAAN, and Chair of Neurology at Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, has extensive experience in developing a Global Health Initiative in Neurology while at Boston University including developing a long-term collaboration with St. Luke Foundation in Haiti.8 At UMMS, the Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Medical Education, Dr. Melissa Fischer, MD, MEd, was identified as a mentor through the Junior Faculty Development Program. She provided insight into curriculum development, implementation, and evaluation. Finally, Global Health Track Directors of other UMMS departments were integral in gaining a broad understanding of the implementation of the program and how it can enhance collaboration.

Goals and objectives

Identifying competencies

There are no standardized requirements for global health education in Graduate Medical Education programs. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has standard competencies that provide a structured guideline for curriculum development. Similarly, a core competency model developed by the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH) covers foundations in public health and interdisciplinary topics. Global health programs that meet ACGME and ASPPH competencies, such as the UMMS global health curriculum, reinforce national standards for resident education and can serve as a prototype for others.9

Partnering with a global site

The Neurology Global Health Director chose a global site that allowed for capacity-building and establishment of clinical, educational, and research collaborations. Transparency regarding resources, opportunities, stakeholders, and logistics was made a priority in selecting a site. As UMMS medical students were already involved in research and advocacy collaboration with the Charutar Arogya Mandal (CAM) Medical Center in Karamsad, Gujarat, this was chosen to be the first collaborative site for the UMMS Department of Neurology.10 Frequent videoconference-based discussions fostered the partnership. Since the establishment of this collaboration, CAM neurology faculty members have visited UMMS, and UMMS faculty and residents have traveled to CAM, which has enhanced learning and continued to strengthen the relationship.

Program development

Pedagogy

In the UMMS neurology global health curriculum, each module was structured to contain a didactic portion aligned with ACGME and ASPPH competencies and a case discussion. References for case selection included online Consortium of Universities for Global Health case studies and the collaborative website between Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics and Stanford Center for Innovation in Global Health.11

Technology

UMMS and CAM connected through Zoom for sharing slides, audio, and video. Videoconferencing offered the unique experience of discussing principles of sustainability and resource limitations in the context of patient cases with CAM residents on a regular basis. This type of experiential learning promoted bidirectional learning and involved a broad audience, extending beyond those who can travel.

Program description

The UMMS neurology global health curriculum included 10 modules implemented over 16 weeks. Seven modules utilized a combination of didactics and case discussion. Two modules were video-conferenced case discussions with CAM. One module focused on theoretical problem-solving in a resource-limited setting in small groups. The video-conferenced case discussions continue on a monthly basis, and 8 modules are integrated into the didactic curriculum over a 2-year academic period.

Program evaluation

Evaluations were administered at various points throughout the UMMS program. Pre- and postassessment consisted of questions on a Likert scale. Additional evaluations in the form of the “one-minute paper” with 3 open-ended questions were administered after modules 3, 5, and 8. Twenty UMMS neurology residents participated in the curriculum, and up to 70% completed assessments. All residents agreed in the pre- and postassessment that they are “interested in global health” and “a global health curriculum is important in residency training.” In addition, 78% were “aware of the impact of neurologic diseases on the global burden of disease” in the preassessment compared to 100% in the postassessment. Fifty percent could “identify neurologic diseases specific to international populations” prior to the curriculum, which increased to 80% after the curriculum. They commented on well-organized and interesting discussions with colleagues in India, although mentioned “technical issues” needing improvement.

In response to “What did you learn from the global health curriculum?” in the postassessment, one postgraduate year (PGY)-3 noted, “The broad impact of incorporating global health initiatives into providing better health care in communities with limited resources. The big gap in health care delivery among different countries.” Another PGY-3 responded, “The impact of some diseases that I thought were more ‘Western’ on the rest of the world.” When asked about ways in which the curriculum could be improved, one PGY-2 responded, “More specific cases, possibly videos of interesting cases.” Utilizing videoconference for case discussions generated positive feedback from residents who enjoyed “the discussion at every step from both sides, especially about differentials.”

Lessons learned

As the global burden of neurologic disease is growing, educating neurology trainees about the epidemiology, management, and treatment of neurologic disease in resource-limited settings is becoming increasingly important. There are various proposed models for developing global health curricula including use of ACGME competencies as a guideline.9,12 The UMMS neurology global health curriculum is one component of a dynamic global health program. A successful global neurology program also aims for financial sustainability, encourages multi-institutional involvement in the parent country, and builds local capacity.13

The role of US and Canadian academic health centers (AHCs) as centers of excellence in medical science and technology has long been recognized. Thus, as major participants in global health, AHCs are called on to take on the responsibility of reducing health disparities and implementing efficient health systems abroad. The Global Health Education Consortium, since 1989, has promoted education and research collaborations between universities to address these challenges.14 The development of a global health program can serve multiple purposes. One goal is to expose trainees to the influence of sociocultural norms on the perception of health care and guide them in developing the cultural competency skills to manage patients in resource-limited settings. Another goal may be to expand on such a program to create a defined multidimensional partnership.

Many US AHCs are committed to providing services at partner institutions abroad and fostering an international presence. A 4-stage framework for development of such partnerships includes developing educational programs and training, consulting and advisory services, management services and delivering and/or owning patient care, education and/or research abroad. Examples include Cleveland Clinic, which manages the Sheikh Khalifa Medical City in Abu Dhabi, and Duke University Medical Center, which offers joint MD degrees through the National University of Singapore Medical School. This requires significant investment by the parent institution including separate legal entities and governance structures to oversee the international activities. In terms of bidirectional educational platforms, a global program promotes specialized teaching and training of local physicians, trainees, and health care workers and research collaborations. In participating in a broad range of activities in a global setting, which may include for-profit consultations, a business approach is necessary, and institutions are using strategic planning to implement these goals with global partners.15

The UMMS neurology global health program supports a robust partnership abroad. Currently, there are multiple departmental educational and research collaborations between UMMS and CAM in the areas of quantitative health sciences, cardiology, surgery, and pediatrics. The neurology program further strengthens this existing partnership. Implementing this neurology program with other partner sites can support and expand UMMS' collaborations abroad. Moreover, helping to create a neurology residency training program at CAM, one of the broader goals of this educational collaboration, will build local capacity.

In developing the UMMS curriculum, it was important to ensure that the goals and objectives of the curriculum aligned with those of the residency program leadership and department. Identifying mentors and resources, with the help of institutional faculty development programs, provided guidance in creating curricula. In addition, identifying internal funding opportunities was helpful in obtaining pilot data prior to pursing external funding. Discussion with residency program leadership on how best to incorporate a global health program without compromising other neurologic education was important. Finally, sustainability of the program required vested interest from the trainees and administration. As organizations such as the American Academy of Neurology increase awareness of global neurology, they offer unique venues for discussion and exchange of material pertaining to global neurology education and scholarship.

The major limitations in developing new curricula were time and funding. Assuming a role within medical education may include protected time. In general, funding is limited for global health education. The UMMS global health program focused on small projects and travel grants available internally to initiate global collaboration.

Global health curricula incorporated into neurology residency training can guide residents on how to approach patients with cultural sensitivity and understand social and political influences on health. Most importantly, a well-developed global health curriculum with video-conferencing can enhance learning and foster bidirectional exchange with a global partner throughout the year. Global health education programs can also serve as a first step toward committing to a larger enterprise of delivering patient care and research services abroad. This type of educational program creates compassionate neurologists with an understanding of the effect of neurologic disease on the global population and better able to treat diverse populations at home and abroad.

Author contributions

Dr. Anindita Deb: design and conceptualization of the manuscript, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, drafting and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Dr. Melissa Fischer: design and conceptualization of the manuscript, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, drafting and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Dr. Anna DePold Hohler: design and conceptualization of the manuscript, drafting and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

Study funding

No targeted funding reported.

Disclosure

The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the UMMS Junior Faculty Development Program members for advice and guidance in development of the UMMS global health curriculum. Eun Kyung Kim, BA, second-year medical student at UMMS, assisted in acquisition of data.

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

  • © 2018 American Academy of Neurology

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Coupet S,
    2. Del Valle J
    . A case for an international health elective training program during residency: a four-points call for action. Teach Learn Med 2013;25:266–271.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ramsey AH,
    2. Haq C,
    3. Gjerde CL,
    4. Rothenberg D
    . Career influence of an international health experience during medical school. Fam Med 2004;36:412–416.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Evert J,
    2. Drain P,
    3. Hall TL
    . Developing Global Health Programming: A Guidebook for Medical and Professional Schools, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Global Health Collaborations Press; 2014.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Thomas PA,
    2. Kern DE,
    3. Hughes MT,
    4. Chen BY
    . Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach, 3rd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2016.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Skolnik RL
    . Global Health 101. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2016.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Berkowitz AL,
    2. Milligan TA,
    3. Cho TA
    . Development of a track in global and humanitarian health for neurology residents. Neurology 2015;85:1894–1895.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gupta AR,
    2. Wells CK,
    3. Horwitz RI,
    4. Bia FJ,
    5. Barry M
    . The International Health Program: the fifteen-year experience with Yale University's Internal Medicine Residency Program. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999;61:1019–1023.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sharma M,
    2. Santini VE,
    3. Auguste M, et al
    . Mon Chéri Haiti: neurology lessons learned. Neurology 2015;85:169–171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Howard CR,
    2. Gladding SP,
    3. Kiguli S,
    4. Andrews JS,
    5. John CC
    . Development of a competency based curriculum in global child health. Acad Med 2011;86:521–528.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Soni A,
    2. Fahey N,
    3. Jaffe A, et al
    . RAHI-SATHI Indo-U.S. Collaboration: the evolution of a trainee-led twinning model in global health into a multidisciplinary collaborative program. Glob Health Sci Pract 2017;5:152–163.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Stanford University Center for Global Health and the Johns Hopkins University Berman Institute of Bioethics. Ethical Challenges in Short-Term Global Health Training. Available at: ethicsandglobalhealth.org/. Accessed June 20, 2017.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Suchdev PS,
    2. Shah A,
    3. Derby KS, et al
    . A proposed model curriculum in global child health for pediatric residents. Acad Pediatr 2012;12:229–237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Siddiqi OK,
    2. Brown M,
    3. Cooper C, et al
    . Developing a successful global neurology program. Ann Neurol 2017;81:167–170.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bryant JH,
    2. Velji A
    . Global health and the role of universities in the twenty-first century. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2011;25:311–321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Merritt MG Jr.,
    2. Railey CJ,
    3. Levin SA,
    4. Crone RK
    . Involvement abroad of U.S. academic health centers and major teaching hospitals: the developing landscape. Acad Med 2008;83:541–549.
    OpenUrlPubMed

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Glossary
    • Needs assessment
    • Goals and objectives
    • Program development
    • Program description
    • Program evaluation
    • Lessons learned
    • Author contributions
    • Study funding
    • Disclosure
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All global neurology
  • Computer use in education
  • Methods of education
  • Other Education
  • Training-international

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 98 (21)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Neurology: Education
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2022 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise