Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation as acute therapy for migraine
The randomized PRESTO study
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore; electroCore, LLC, Basking Ridge, NJ) for the acute treatment of migraine in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.
Methods A total of 248 participants with episodic migraine with/without aura were randomized to receive nVNS or sham within 20 minutes from pain onset. Participants were to repeat treatment if pain had not improved in 15 minutes.
Results nVNS (n = 120) was superior to sham (n = 123) for pain freedom at 30 minutes (12.7% vs 4.2%; p = 0.012) and 60 minutes (21.0% vs 10.0%; p = 0.023) but not at 120 minutes (30.4% vs 19.7%; p = 0.067; primary endpoint; logistic regression) after the first treated attack. A post hoc repeated-measures test provided further insight into the therapeutic benefit of nVNS through 30, 60, and 120 minutes (odds ratio 2.3; 95% confidence interval 1.2, 4.4; p = 0.012). nVNS demonstrated benefits across other endpoints including pain relief at 120 minutes and was safe and well-tolerated.
Conclusion This randomized sham-controlled trial supports the abortive efficacy of nVNS as early as 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes after an attack. Findings also suggest effective pain relief, tolerability, and practicality of nVNS for the acute treatment of episodic migraine.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02686034.
Classification of evidence This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2 hours poststimulation (absolute difference 13.2%).
Glossary
- AE=
- adverse event;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- ICHD-3 beta=
- International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version);
- IHS=
- International Headache Society;
- ITT=
- intent-to-treat;
- nVNS=
- noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation;
- PRESTO=
- Prospective Study of nVNS for the Acute Treatment of Migraine;
- SAE=
- serious adverse event
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by electroCore, LLC.
Coinvestigators are listed at links.lww.com/WNL/A593.
See page 167
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
Podcast: NPub.org/obi0b6
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received January 2, 2018.
- Accepted in final form April 11, 2018.
- © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Noninvasive vagal nerve stimulation: A new dimension of empiricism
- Vinod K. Gupta, Physician, Gupta Medical Center (New Delhi, India)
Submitted July 27, 2018
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
More Online
Dr. Babak Hooshmand and Dr. David Smith
► Watch
Related Articles
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Randomized controlled trial of an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, MK-0974, in acute treatment of migraineT. W. Ho, L. K. Mannix, X. Fan et al.Neurology, October 03, 2007 -
Article
Reduced efficacy of sumatriptan in migraine with aura vs without auraJakob Møller Hansen, Peter J. Goadsby, Andrew Charles et al.Neurology, April 03, 2015 -
Articles
Multimechanistic (sumatriptan-naproxen) early intervention for the acute treatment of migraineS. D. Silberstein, L. K. Mannix, J. Goldstein et al.Neurology, July 07, 2008 -
Articles
Randomized, controlled trial of telcagepant for the acute treatment of migraineK. M. Connor, R. E. Shapiro, H. -C. Diener et al.Neurology, September 21, 2009