This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the accuracy of preselected software automatic seizure files to detect at least one seizure per study in prolonged ambulatory EEG recording.
Methods All the prolonged ambulatory EEG recordings (>24 hours) read at the Northwestern Memorial Hospital from January 2013 to October 2017 were included. We selected only the first study of each patient. We reviewed the studies entirely, and processed the recordings through 1 of 3 different detection software that are commercially available (Persyst 11, Persyst 12, and Gotman TM Event Detection). The proportion of patients with at least one electrographic seizure (≥10 seconds) correctly identified by a seizure detector was calculated. Finally, we evaluated whether the type of seizure (focal vs generalized) may affect the chances of being automatically detected.
Results We read 1,478 ambulatory EEG studies entirely (2,323 days of EEG recording; average 1.6 d/study). From the first study of each patient (1,257 studies), we found electrographic seizures in 70 (5.6%) studies. In 37 of 70 patients (53%), the automatic detectors correctly identified at least one seizure. Detections happened slightly more frequently in generalized seizures (14/20, 70%) compared to focal seizures (23/50, 46%) (p = 0.06).
Conclusion Seizures were found in 5.6% of the studies. Automatic seizure detectors identified at least one electrographic seizure in only 53% of the studies. They performed slightly better detecting generalized than focal seizures. Therefore, the review of only automatically selected segments may be of decreased value to identify seizures, in particular when focal seizures are suspected.
Glossary
- aEEG=
- ambulatory EEG;
- ASD=
- automatic seizure detector
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 641
Podcast: NPub.org/axal9n
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received March 19, 2018.
- Accepted in final form November 24, 2018.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
- Teaching an EEG to read itself
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.