This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To test effects on care quality of Chronic Care Model-based Parkinson disease (PD) management.
Methods This 2-group stratified randomized trial involved 328 veterans with PD in southwestern United States. Guided care management, led by PD nurses, was compared to usual care. Primary outcomes were adherence to 18 PD care quality indicators. Secondary outcomes were patient-centered outcome measures. Data sources were telephone survey and electronic medical record (EMR). Outcomes were analyzed as intent-to-treat comparing initial and final survey and repeated-measures mixed-effects models.
Results Average age was 71 years; 97% of participants were male. Mean proportion of participants receiving recommended PD care indicators was significantly higher for the intervention than for usual care (0.77 vs 0.58) (mean difference 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16, 0.22). Of 8 secondary outcomes, the only significant difference of the changes over time was in the positive Patient Health Questionnaire–2 depression screen for intervention minus usual care (−11.52 [95% CI −20.42, −2.62]).
Conclusion A nurse-led chronic care management intervention, Care Coordination for Health Promotion and Activities in Parkinson's Disease (CHAPS), substantially increased adherence to PD quality of care indicators among veterans with PD, as documented in the EMR. Of 8 secondary outcomes assessed, a screening measure for depressive symptomatology was the only measure that was better in the intervention compared to usual care. More telephone calls in CHAPS were the only utilization difference over usual care. While CHAPS appears promising for improving PD care, additional iterative research is needed to refine the CHAPS model in routine clinical care so that it measurably improves patient-centered outcomes (NCT01532986).
Classification of evidence This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with PD, CHAPS increased adherence to PD quality of care indicators.
Glossary
- CAHPS=
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems;
- CHAPS=
- Care Coordination for Health Promotion and Activities in Parkinson's Disease;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- EMR=
- electronic medical record;
- HUI3=
- Health Utilities Index 3;
- ICD-9=
- International Classification of Diseases–9;
- IRB=
- institutional review board;
- MOS=
- Medical Outcomes Study;
- NCM=
- nurse care manager;
- OR=
- odds ratio;
- PACIC=
- Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care;
- PD=
- Parkinson disease;
- PHQ=
- Patient Healthcare Questionnaire;
- PM=
- project manager;
- SDMM=
- Siebens Domain Management Model;
- VA=
- Veterans Affairs;
- WHO-5=
- WHO Well-being Index–5
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 739
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received August 9, 2018.
- Accepted in final form December 26, 2018.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
