This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
My coauthors and I appreciate Dr. Rosenberg's comments on our article,1 and we agree in principle. The scope of the case report did not allow for the elaboration of the additional teaching points that Dr. Rosenberg elucidates, namely that there may be a contribution by the so-called peripheral nasal crescent, and that central sparing is typically very congruous. The visual field published is a copy of the exact visual field as it was obtained in the acute clinical setting.1 It depicts precisely what was extracted from the patient shortly after the original CNS insult by an experienced perimetrist. The patient was not cognitively entirely fit at the time due to the insult itself, which limits the precision of perimetry. However, it demonstrates the main principles offered as teaching points in the short communication. Regarding the comment pertaining to the notch, it is difficult to demonstrate such a finding even by experienced perimetrists, let alone in patients coming out of the intensive care unit.
Footnotes
Author disclosures are available upon request (journal{at}neurology.org).
- Received March 4, 2019.
- Accepted in final form March 1, 2019.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.