Teaching NeuroImages: Acute stroke captured on EEG in the ICU
Visual and quantitative analysis
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

A 56-year-old man underwent a complicated left carotid endarterectomy, ultimately resulting in complete arterial ligation. Postoperative examination was nonfocal; CT perfusion noted vulnerability of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory (figure 1, A–C). EEG placed for ischemia monitoring was initially symmetric (figure 2A). Overnight, new left temporal attenuation was noted, a hallmark of cortical ischemia1 (figure 2B), which prompted clinical evaluation. Quantitative EEG (QEEG) showed simultaneous decreases in left hemispheric 30–64 Hz power and amplitude-integrated EEG, followed by delayed reduction in left alpha/delta ratio (figure 2C). Subsequent examination revealed new right hemiparesis, and MRI showed left MCA infarction (figure 2D). Thus, QEEG can detect cerebral ischemia and provide timely information in the intensive care unit.2
(A) Increased mean transit time, (B) decreased cerebral blood flow, and (C) unchanged cerebral blood volume in the left middle cerebral artery territory indicate an area at risk for infarct.
(A) Baseline EEG before presumed time of stroke. (B) EEG: left hemispheric, temporal maximal attenuation of faster frequencies after stroke (brackets). (C) Spectrogram: acute reduction of higher frequency activity over the left hemisphere (white arrow); quantitative EEG (red tracings correspond to the right hemisphere, blue tracings to the left hemisphere): simultaneous reductions in left hemispheric 30–64 Hz power (black arrow) and amplitude-integrated EEG (purple arrow), with delayed drop in alpha/delta ratio 15 minutes later (bracket) (Insight II software, version 11 [Persyst Development Corporation, Prescott, AZ]). (D) MRI brain, diffusion-weighted imaging sequence, shows completed left middle cerebral artery infarct.
Study funding
No targeted funding reported.
Disclosure
B. Kamitaki is employed by Rutgers–Robert Wood Johnson University, reads inpatient EEG studies, and bills for these studies; he has no other disclosures. B. Tu is employed by Columbia University Medical Center and reads inpatient EEG studies; he has no other disclosures. A. Reynolds reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. C. Schevon has research support from NIH (R01 NS084142 and R01 NS095368) and reads inpatient EEG studies in the course of her employment at Columbia University Medical Center and bills for these studies. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Appendix Authors

Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Teaching slides links.lww.com/WNL/A802
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.