Teaching NeuroImages: Electroretinographic artifacts in EEG
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

A 47-year-old woman was admitted following an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. On presentation, the patient's Glasgow Coma Scale was 3. CT brain showed inversion of gray–white densities and diffuse cerebral edema consistent with severe hypoxic ischemic injury and EEG showed electro-cerebral inactivity throughout the recording with time-locked electroretinographic (ERG) discharges to photic stimulus (figure). Recognizing the discharges as ERG artifacts rather than cerebral reactivity to photic stimulus or photic blink reflex is of paramount importance to avoid misinformed neurologic prognostication.1,2 The misrecognition of the latter 2 discharges may erroneously suggest a functionally intact thalamo-cortical network and brainstem, respectively.
(A) CT brain shows diffuse cerebral edema and loss of normal gray–white differentiation. (B, C) Longitudinal bipolar montage (2 μV/mm sensitivity) shows electroretinographic (ERG) artifacts from retinal depolarization (arrows) induced by photic stimulus (arrowheads). Alternate covering of right and left eye blocked retinal stimulation, obliterating ERG discharges, first in Fp2 (B), then in Fp1 (C), confirming the ocular source of these waveforms.
Study funding
No targeted funding reported.
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Appendix Authors

Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Teaching slides links.lww.com/WNL/A982
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
References
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. David E. Vaillancourt and Dr. Shannon Y. Chiu
► Watch
Related Articles
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
How not to read an EEG
Artifact-related epilepsyWilliam O. Tatum et al.Neurology, December 24, 2012 -
Articles
Neurologic prognosis and withdrawal of life support after resuscitation from cardiac arrestR. G. Geocadin, M. M. Buitrago, M. T. Torbey et al.Neurology, July 10, 2006 -
Article
The FOUR score as predictor of outcome in adults with bacterial meningitisCornelis N. van Ettekoven, Matthijs C. Brouwer, Merijn W. Bijlsma et al.Neurology, May 03, 2019 -
Article
Association of MRI Brain Injury With Outcome After Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestMatthew P. Kirschen, Daniel J. Licht, Jennifer Faerber et al.Neurology, November 18, 2020