This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the natural course of scoliosis and to estimate lifetime probability of scoliosis surgery in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).
Methods We analyzed cross-sectional data from 283 patients from our population-based cohort study. Additional longitudinal data on scoliosis progression and spinal surgery were collected from 36 consecutive patients who received scoliosis surgery at our center.
Results The lifetime probability of receiving scoliosis surgery was ≈80% in SMA types 1c and 2. Patients with type 2 who only learned to sit (type 2a) were significantly younger at time of surgery than those who learned to sit and stand (type 2b). The lifetime risk of surgery was lower in type 3a (40%) and strongly associated with age at loss of ambulation: 71% in patients losing ambulation before 10 years of age vs 22% losing ambulation after the age of 10 years (p = 0.005). In type 3a, preserving the ability to walk 1 year longer corresponded to a 15% decrease in lifetime risk of scoliosis surgery (hazard ratio 0.852, p = 0.017). Scoliosis development was characterized by initial slow progression, followed by acceleration in the 1.5- to 2-year period before surgery.
Conclusion The lifetime probability of scoliosis surgery is high in SMA types 1c and 2 and depends on age at loss of ambulation in type 3. Motor milestones such as standing that are not part of the standard classification system are of additional predictive value. Our data may act as a reference to assess long-term effects of new SMA-specific therapies.
Glossary
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- SMA=
- spinal muscular atrophy;
- SMN=
- survival motor neuron
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Dr. Sombroek is currently at the Department of Internal Medicine, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, the Netherlands.
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received August 1, 2018.
- Accepted in final form February 20, 2019.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.