Teaching NeuroImages: When MRI is a clue in episodic ataxia
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

A 3-year-old girl presented with episodic ataxia for the past month. It lasted for 1–2 days continuously after a febrile illness. MRI was suggestive of a neurometabolic disorder (figure, A–L). Plasma valine and leucine and urinary branched-chain aminoacids were elevated. Clinical exome revealed a homozygous, missense, pathogenic variation in BCKDHB gene (exon 5, chr6:80878686A>C; p.His191Pro).
MRI shows hyperintense signal in (A) cerebellar deep white matter including nuclei (short white arrow) and dorsal pons (long white arrow), (B) globus pallidi (black arrow) and thalami, and (C) bilateral cerebral white matter (white arrow) in axial T2 scan. These changes are hypointense on T1 scan (D–F). Diffusion-weighted images (G–I, b = 1,000) and apparent diffusion coefficient (J–L) show acute diffusion restriction.
Patients with intermittent maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) may develop episodic decompensation during periods of stress secondary to acute leucinuria and abnormal neurotransmitter activity.1 Bilateral, symmetrical diffusion restriction in myelinated areas of the brain is seen in aminoacidopathies, including MSUD, nonketotic hyperglycinemia, and Canavan disease.2
Study funding
No targeted funding reported.
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Appendix Authors

Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Teaching slides links.lww.com/WNL/B3
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
References
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.