Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to define seizure response, seizure reduction rates and possible factors associated with a good outcome.
Background: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) is a device approved for seizure management in patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Many studies were conducted with a variability of responses in seizure reduction.
Design/Methods: We interrogated the database of the epilepsy program at the London Health Science Centre, searching for VNS implantations in patients with medically resistant epilepsy since the VNS was available in Canada (1997) to September 2018.
Results: A total of 114 patients were included. The median age of VNS implantation was 34.4 years old (IQR=1.5–64) and the age of implantation was 26.5(IQR=20–34). 56.1%(N=64) of patients were male. 27%(N=31) had generalized epilepsy and the most common etiology was unknown in 27%(N=31). The number of antiseizure medications at the time of the implantation was 3(IQR=2–3) and the frequency of seizures was 25(IQR=8.7–60). The median follow-up period was 46 months after the implantation. The seizure rate reduction was −68.2%(IQR=(−92.6%)–(−37.1%)) after the VNS was implanted and 56%(N=41) had a seizure reduction equal or higher than 50%. The type of seizures with a significant seizure reduction (p<0.005) were generalized tonic-clonic, bilateral tonic-clonic and focal with impairment of awareness. The etiology with the best response was genetic generalized epilepsy (p<0.02) and the best models were 103, 102, 105 and 106. Complications were detected in 5.3%(N=6). Side effects were found in 63.2%(N=72) and the most common side effects were hoarseness, voice change and pain in the neck that improved over time.
Conclusions: VNS is a relatively safe therapy as an adjutant therapy in patients with medically resistant epilepsy, with a good response in more than a half of the patients. The patients with generalized and bilateral tonic-clonic seizures show the greatest improvement from VNS.
Disclosure: Dr. Suller Marti has nothing to disclose. Dr. McLachlan has nothing to disclose. Dr. Mirsattari has nothing to disclose. Dr. Steven has nothing to disclose. Dr. Parrent has nothing to disclose. Dr. Andrade has nothing to disclose. Dr. deRibaupierre has nothing to disclose. Dr. Diosy has nothing to disclose. Dr. MacDougall has nothing to disclose. Dr. Burneo has nothing to disclose.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.