Abstract
Objective: Assess whether Sarnat staging could predict neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months of age.
Background: Sarnat staging as neurodevelopmental predictor during therapeutic hypothermia treatment for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy are currently minimal.
Design/Methods: Retrospective chart review of full-term infants admitted to Morristown Medical Center’s Neonatal Intensive Care Unit from January 2014 – December 2017 that underwent therapeutic hypothermia for suspected HIE. Infants were retrospectively assigned Sarnat scores and classified as mild, moderate, or severe encephalopathy during treatment, post-treatment, and discharge. Developmental data was retrospectively collected at 24mo using Gesell Developmental Assessment Tool.
The raw Gesell score was expressed as a developmental quotient (tested age/actual age). The effect of Sarnat stage on DQ was assessed by multiple regression analysis with DQ as the dependent variable, and gestational age, birth weight, gender, 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores as independent variables.
Results: 23 full-term infants were collected. Developmental data at 24mo and Sarnat scores were available for 14 infants. Mean (SD) birth weight was 3.3 kg (0.47), gestational age 39.0w (0.6), and Apgars 2 (0.75 – 3, median, IQR), 3.5 (1.5 – 5), and 5 (4 – 5) at 1, 5, and 10 minutes. All infants required positive pressure ventilation and 6/14 (43%) required chest compressions at delivery.
The DQ at 24mo significantly correlated with severity of Sarnat score pre-cooling (p = 0.024), as well as days 1 (p=0.038), 2 (p=0.023), and 3 (p=0.023) during cooling; however, not on days 1 (p=0.097), 2 (p=0.11), or 4 (p = 0.061) post-cooling. The Gesell subscales least correlating with Sarnat scores were expressive language and social skills, which were only significant at pre-cooling (p=0.018 and p=0.021).
Conclusions: Sarnat staging continues to be a powerful predictor of long-term neurodevelopment before and during therapeutic hypothermia treatment. This finding may be important in low-resource settings where other potential predictors of long-term outcome may be unavailable.
Disclosure: Dr. Gordon has nothing to disclose. Dr. Griffin has nothing to disclose. Dr. Bennett has nothing to disclose.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.