Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

June 16, 2020; 94 (24) Views & ReviewsOpen Access

Functional gait disorders

A sign-based approach

Jorik Nonnekes, Evžen Růžička, Tereza Serranová, Stephen G. Reich, Bastiaan R. Bloem, View ORCID ProfileMark Hallett
First published June 1, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009649
Jorik Nonnekes
From the Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders; Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (E.R., T.S.), First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology (S.G.R.), The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (B.R.B.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; andNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (M.H.), Bethesda, MD.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evžen Růžička
From the Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders; Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (E.R., T.S.), First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology (S.G.R.), The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (B.R.B.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; andNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (M.H.), Bethesda, MD.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tereza Serranová
From the Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders; Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (E.R., T.S.), First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology (S.G.R.), The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (B.R.B.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; andNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (M.H.), Bethesda, MD.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen G. Reich
From the Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders; Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (E.R., T.S.), First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology (S.G.R.), The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (B.R.B.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; andNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (M.H.), Bethesda, MD.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bastiaan R. Bloem
From the Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders; Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (E.R., T.S.), First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology (S.G.R.), The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (B.R.B.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; andNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (M.H.), Bethesda, MD.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Hallett
From the Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders; Department of Rehabilitation (J.N.), Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience (E.R., T.S.), First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology (S.G.R.), The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (B.R.B.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; andNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (M.H.), Bethesda, MD.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark Hallett
Full PDF
Citation
Functional gait disorders
A sign-based approach
Jorik Nonnekes, Evžen Růžička, Tereza Serranová, Stephen G. Reich, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Mark Hallett
Neurology Jun 2020, 94 (24) 1093-1099; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009649

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
7428

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Functional gait disorders are common in clinical practice. They are also usually disabling for affected individuals. The diagnosis is challenging because no single walking pattern is pathognomonic for a functional gait disorder. Establishing a diagnosis is based not primarily on excluding organic gait disorders but instead predominantly on recognizing positive clinical features of functional gait disorders, such as an antalgic, a buckling, or a waddling gait. However, these features can resemble and overlap with organic gait disorders. It is therefore necessary to also look for inconsistency (variations in clinical presentation that cannot be reconciled with an organic lesion) and incongruity (combination of symptoms and signs that is not seen with organic lesions). Yet, these features also have potential pitfalls as inconsistency can occur in patients with dystonic gait or those with freezing of gait. Similarly, patients with dystonia or chorea can present with bizarre gait patterns that may falsely be interpreted as incongruity. A further complicating factor is that functional and organic gait disorders may coexist within the same patient. To improve the diagnostic process, we present a sign-based approach—supported by videos—that incorporates the diverse clinical spectrum of functional gait disorders. We identify 7 groups of supportive gait signs that can signal the presence of functional gait disorders. For each group of signs, we highlight how specific clinical tests can bring out the inconsistencies and incongruencies that further point to a functional gait disorder.

Glossary

DYT=
dystonia type

Functional gait disorders are both common and disabling. Depending on the clinical setting, 2%–20% of patients referred to movement disorders outpatient clinics have a functional movement disorder,1 and 40% of these patients have gait abnormalities without a structural lesion.2,3 It is important to timely recognize the features of a functional gait as approximately 12% of patients across all neurologic disease categories have a functional overlay.4 However, many clinicians find these functional gait disorders difficult to diagnose. They are often seen together with other functional movement disorders, although pure functional gait disorders occur in approximately 6%–8.5% of patients with functional neurologic disorders.2,3 When present together with other functional signs, proper recognition of a functional gait pattern is often very helpful in establishing the functional nature of the overall presentation, particularly when this is less obvious from the other neurologic signs.5

For several reasons, the term functional gait disorder is preferred over psychogenic gait disorder. First, psychological distress is not always evident,6 and functional gait disorders are often diagnosed in the absence of obvious precipitating stressors. Indeed, psychological stressors are now considered only as risk factors and not as essential causative triggers.7 Second, because acceptance of the diagnosis is essential for successful treatment, the more descriptive term functional gait disorders is preferred over psychogenic gait disorder, which has a negative connotation for many patients.8 For these reasons, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders V (DSM-V) now uses the term Functional Neurological Symptom Disorders instead of Psychogenic Neurological Disorders. Moreover, the DSM-V diagnosis no longer relies on the presence of obvious psychological stressors.9 Importantly, functional neurologic symptoms (including functional gait disorders) are not thought to be produced intentionally and are therefore distinct from malingering and factitious disorder.

Several reviews have described the clinical phenomenology and treatment of functional movement disorders,8,10,11 but these only touched briefly on the spectrum and diagnosis of functional gait disorders. In this video-illustrated review, we describe a practical sign-based approach to functional gait disorders, aiming to improve the diagnostic process in daily clinical practice.

Diagnosing a functional gait disorder

Diagnosing a functional gait disorder is challenging for several reasons. First, there is not a single pathognomonic gait pattern.12 Functional gait disorders are often equated with bizarre clinical features, but this is a diagnostic pitfall because organic gait disorders can also produce bizarre gait patterns, as may occur in patients with choreatic or dystonic gait. Second, functional gait disorders can present with clinical features that resemble organic gait disorders. For example, a buckling gait (the knees giving way) is a common phenotype of a functional gait, but can also occur in patients with negative myoclonus of the lower extremities. Third, the presence of an organic gait disorder does not exclude the coexistence of a superimposed functional component and vice versa; when there is an obvious functional gait disorder, there might be some underlying organic disease as well.13 It can therefore be helpful to perform ancillary testing to rule out concurrent underlying organic neurologic disorders. However, the diagnosis of a clinically established functional movement disorder itself relies primarily on recognizing characteristic supportive features, which includes an inconsistency and incongruence with organic gait disorders, and not by simply ruling out, to the extent possible, an organic gait disorder.14

An example of inconsistency is an unexplained variability in gait disorder severity over time. Some patients can walk in daily life situations but are unable to walk during the physical examination.10 Family members may sometimes comment about a different walking pattern they are seeing during the examination compared with the gait pattern that is present at home. In addition, some patients manifest marked walking difficulties while being observed, but move remarkably better during spontaneous movements, e.g., in the examination room15 of while getting dressed or undressed. Unexplained variability also includes spontaneous remissions or exacerbations over time and a lack of falls despite severe gait impairments. Another example of inconsistency is a mismatch between the objectively visible severity of the gait impairments and any self-reported limitations during activities of daily living. This discrepancy can be in either direction, i.e., severe gait impairment may be present during examination but without any limitations during activities of daily living, or severe restrictions in daily life activities may be reported in the presence of mild gait impairments.13

Incongruency involves a combination of symptoms and signs not seen in organic gait disorders. For example, a sudden onset or rapid progression of gait impairments is uncommon in the absence of trauma or a structural lesion.2 Delayed onset of gait impairment after a (minor) trauma is another example of incongruency. The incongruency can also be brought out by the neurologic examination. An example would be an antalgic gait in the absence of any pain or a buckling gait (knees giving way) in the presence of normal quadriceps strength. Another example is a scissoring gait in the absence of corticospinal tract signs (such as brisk reflexes and hip adductor spasticity). Occasionally, the pattern itself is simply incongruent with functioning of the nervous system, as in a reported patient with a recumbent gait who continued to make stepping movements with the legs even while lying down flat on her back with eyes closed.16 An improvement of the gait pattern when the patient is volitionally performing a dual task (either motor or cognitive in nature) is another sign of both inconsistency and incongruency.

A sign-based diagnostic approach

In daily clinical practice, the picture is often subtler than these examples, which makes it challenging to identify inconsistencies and incongruencies. To facilitate the diagnostic process, we present a sign-based diagnostic approach, which incorporates the diverse clinical spectrum of functional gait disorders. According to this approach, the presenting signs are taken as the starting point for a tailored search into the origin of the gait disorder (either functional or organic). Importantly, evaluation of gait, and the identification of abnormal gait signs, cannot take place in a small examination room, as this does not elicit all relevant features, so patients really need to be taken to the corridor. We propose that abnormal gait signs (such as scissoring of the legs, buckling of the knees, or inability to walk in a straight line) are first classified into 1 of 7 broad categories: (1) ataxic gait, (2) spastic gait, (3) weak gait, (4) antalgic gait, (5) parkinsonian gait, (6), hemiparetic gait, and (7) dystonic gait (table). These 7 categories are the result of several consensus meetings between the authors. The rest of the subsequent examination is used to evaluate specific gait and balance tests that can help to reveal inconsistencies or incongruencies (table).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table

Abnormalities observed during walking and supportive tests help to evaluate consistency and congruency

Video 12

Disappearance of scissoring when walking backward in a patient with a functional gait disorder. In patients with spasticity, scissoring persists when walking backward.Download Supplementary Video 12 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_12

Video 13

Functional gait (giving the impression of weakness) in a patient with myasthenia gravis. Incongruencies between the gait pattern and functional strength tests.Download Supplementary Video 13 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_13

Video 14

Knee buckling in a patient with a functional gait disorder, disappearing when running, walking backward, or performing tandem gait.Download Supplementary Video 14 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_14

Video 15

Knee buckling in a patient with a functional gait disorder, disappearing when dancing. Slow knee buckling as shown in this video is only possible in the presence of good quadriceps strength.Download Supplementary Video 15 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_15

Video 16

Antalgic functional gait disorder, disappearing when running or performing tandem gait.Download Supplementary Video 16 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_16

Video 17

Dragging of the right leg in a patient with idiopathic Parkinson disease with a functional gait disorder. This is an incongruent pattern, and there is an inexplicable variability when performing tandem gait or walking backward.Download Supplementary Video 17 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_17

Video 18

Disappearance of functional posturing when walking sideways and performing tandem gait.Download Supplementary Video 18 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_18

We illustrate this sign-based approach here for only the first group of gait signs, namely ataxic gait, which may be cerebellar, sensory, vestibular, or functional in origin. Suggestive signs for an ataxic gait include variability in the base of support and stride, inability to walk in a straight line (sometimes with an excessive arm swing), and claims of poor balance (video 1). A commonly observed inconsistency in patients with functional gait disorders resembling ataxia is balance control that is actually much better than what is perceived by the patient. During straight walking, patients may seek support of chairs, doorposts, or walls (video 2 and video 3), but do not actually fall even when such support is absent. Moreover, patients with functional gait disorders often seek support by objects that are actually quite for away. As illustrated by video 2 and video 3, these patients are crossing the hallway to reach for support. Patients with organic ataxia seek support as well, but typically avoid to stray far from their support, and are much less likely to keep crossing the hallway. In addition, most patients with functional gait disorders do not fall despite the presence of exaggerated truncal sway (video 4). In fact, many patients actually display an excellent balance. When performing a dual task or when running or walking backward, improvement of gait performance is often seen in patients with a functional gait. Alternatively, patients with functional gait may display an exaggerated performance during these gait and balance tests. Importantly, the gait pattern typically does not alter markedly during running, walking backward, or dual-task performance in patients with sensory, vestibular, or cerebellar ataxia. If anything, performance deteriorates further because such tests are more demanding, but the walking pattern remains consistent. Walking with eyes closed, on the other hand, will worsen the gait pattern in patients with sensory or vestibular ataxia, whereas improvement can be observed in patients with a functional gait pattern (but remember the patient with the recumbent gait where the functional nature was elicited mainly after eye closure). Eye closure will typically force patients with unilateral vestibular or cerebellar lesions to veer to one side, whereas patients with functional ataxia can be seen veering from side to side, even with eyes open (video 2 and video 3). Another useful gait and balance test that may reveal inconsistencies and incongruencies is tandem walking. Patients with an organic origin of their ataxia are unable to perform tandem gait without taking one or more side steps, whereas patients with a functional gait pattern resembling ataxia may perform the tandem gait without sidesteps or may even display scissoring (crossing of the legs) or an exaggerated performance with prolonged single-leg stance or windmill like movements of the arms, but without falling (video 5 and video 6). Patients with functional gait disorders may fall, but in an incongruent manner (e.g., slowly without injuring themselves; video 7).

Video 1

Broad-based gait in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA7).Download Supplementary Video 1 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_1

Video 2

Seeking support of doorposts and walls in a patient with a functional gait disorder. Patients with organic ataxia seek support as well, but typically avoid to stray far from their support, and are much less likely to keep crossing the hallway as illustrated in this patient.Download Supplementary Video 2 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_2

Video 3

Seeking support of doorposts and walls in a patient with a functional gait disorder. Patients with organic ataxia seek support as well, but typically avoid to stray far from their support, and are much less likely to keep crossing the hallway as illustrated in this patient.Download Supplementary Video 3 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_3

Video 4

Exaggerated truncal sway in patient with a functional gait disorder. This patient does not (near-)fall despite the presence of exaggerated truncal sway.Download Supplementary Video 4 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_4

Video 5

Exaggerated performance during tandem gait in a patient with a functional gait disorder: the patient displays prolonged single-leg stance and windmill like movements of the arms, but without falling.Download Supplementary Video 5 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_5

Video 6

Exaggerated performance with prolonged single-leg stance during tandem gait in a patient with a functional gait disorder.Download Supplementary Video 6 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_6

Video 7

Incongruent falling in a patient with a functional gait disorder.Download Supplementary Video 7 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_7

The Romberg test may reveal inconsistencies and incongruencies as well. Patients with cerebellar ataxia often cannot participate in Romberg testing as maintaining balance with the feet together and eyes open is significantly impaired. The Romberg test is abnormal in both patients with sensory ataxia (together with an abnormal sensory examination) and patients with vestibular ataxia (who may manifest veering to the side of the lesion). Patients with functional gait ataxia may display a positive Romberg test in the absence of sensory abnormalities, or alternatively, often with exaggerated truncal sway but without falling. People without functional or organic disorders may occasionally have a positive Romberg if asked to simple stand with eyes closed; they may lose balance due to introspection about standing with eyes closed. To minimize this, continuing to engage the person in conversation during the Romberg test can minimize this problem.

Finally, the pull test can also be helpful. The test can obviously be abnormal in patients with an organic gait disorder, but most will make attempts to try and maintain their balance (either taking multiple steps or by hinging of the trunk). Patients with a functional gait can show excessive trunk sway without ever falling, or fall completely passively backward into the arms of the examiner, although balance appears otherwise much better during the remainder of the examination.16 Note that patients with advanced Parkinson disease and atypical parkinsonism can also show complete absence of balance corrections during the pull test, either because of marked postural instability or because freezing interferes with their ability to take corrective steps.17 A marked discrepancy between a severely abnormal pull test and a much better or even normal forward push test can also be helpful,16 although patients with Parkinson disease can also show such discrepancies.

Potential pitfalls

Care must be taken not to miss organic disorders that present with such inconsistencies. For example, improvement with walking backward can occur in patients with dystonic gait (reflecting the task specificity of the problem, which is typical for dystonia)18 (video 8), whereas marked improvement with running can occur in patients with freezing of gait. Patients with freezing can also show many other inconsistencies, when using rather well-preserved alternative gait patterns (such as scissoring of the legs or walking with skating movements) that are less automated, more goal directed, or externally driven and hence less dependent on defective basal ganglia circuitries.19 Moreover, patients with dystonia can episodically apply gestes antagonistes, which are compensatory motor or sensory tricks to overcome or reduce dystonia.20 Video 9 illustrates a patient with Parkinson disease with a Pisa syndrome triggered by exposure to a dopamine receptor agonist (consistently present when walking forward, backward, and when running), which improved on touching the head. These gestes antagonistes may also incorrectly be classified as an inconsistent gait feature. Another published Parkinson patient revealed a highly unusual pattern (that might easily be mistaken for a functional sign), namely alleviation of freezing of gait when he gently pressed his temples, either as sensory trick or, most likely, as an attentional mechanism.21 Chorea may also be misinterpreted as functional, and this applies to levodopa-induced dyskinesias, which can present with rather bizarre gait patterns—an example is the stamping gait produced by biphasic dyskinesias with pronounced dystonic elements (such as stepping with kicks or high knee elevations), as can be seen particularly in younger men with Parkinson disease.22 Although these levodopa-induced dyskinesias can appear outright bizarre, they are remarkably stereotyped and consistent in their presentation, without alterations in presentation over time or with specific tests such as running or walking backward.22 This again serves to emphasize that a bizarre gait pattern should not be equated with functional gait disorders.

Video 8

Dystonia of the left foot in a patient with idiopathic Parkinson disease, which improves when walking backward or when running. Increased hip flexion during the swing phase results in sufficient clearance and thereby compensates for the ankle plantar flexion due to dystonia.Download Supplementary Video 8 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_8

Video 9

Patient with Parkinson disease with a Pisa syndrome triggered by exposure to a dopamine receptor agonist, which improved on touching the head. Posturing of the trunk was consistently present regardless of whether the patient was walking forward, backward, or running.Download Supplementary Video 9 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_9

Another fairly common organic gait disorder that might be mistaken for functional is the walking pattern in patients with frontal lobe dysfunction (e.g., due to a frontal lesion), which can produce a variety of gait patterns, including a highly variable gait pattern with increased truncal sway and gait scissoring.12 To complicate matters further, the gait pattern might also change with disease progression, which can incorrectly be interpreted as an inconsistent feature. Helpful features here include the consistency of the gait pattern across different gait tests, as well as the presence of other frontal release signs during neurologic examination.

Several rare organic gaits might be mistaken for having a functional nature. One is the hobby horse gait, which has been described in patients with dystonia type 4 (DYT 4).23 These patients walk as if riding a hobby horse, with a stiff-legged skipping gait. The pattern is, however, very consistent and may be accompanied by other signs of dystonia. Ref. 23 contains an illustrative video demonstrating this gait type. Another example is an unusual clasp-knife type of gait in a patient with DYT1 dystonia, with sudden hinging of the trunk on gait initiation, and even when producing stepping movements while standing in place (video 10). In this case, the consistency of the abnormal movements (during walking, running, backward walking, and stepping in place) and the presence of other dystonic features (elicited also during the seated examination) pointed to the organicity of the gait abnormalities. Another rare organic gait that might be misinterpreted occurs in patients with stiff-person syndrome. These patients typically present with stiffness and spasms in the lumbar region and lower extremities,24,25 and gait is usually deliberately very slow and broad based in an effort to prevent falling (video 11). Pattern recognition is important here, as the presentation—which also includes the characteristic lumbar hyperlordosis—is in fact both congruent and consistent. Another rare yet organic gait is knee buckling in patients with negative myoclonus, as may occur after cerebral hypoxia, hepatic encephalopathy or in patients with Huntington disease. The negative myoclonus causes a bouncing gait characterized by postural lapses. In this situation, the bounces are usually very quick and look very different from the much slower and prolonged buckling seen in functional disorders (which actually require a very good quadriceps strength). Cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy can occasionally also lead to buckling of the knees, although such spells are typically much briefer and are linked to specific triggers such as laughter. However, a gait pattern with staggering to both sides and buckling of the knees has been described in a patient with excessive daytime sleepiness due to status cataplecticus.26 Ref. 24 contains an illustrative video demonstrating this gait type. Many of these rare neurologic conditions are usually accompanied by other clinical features that would help to make the diagnosis.

Video 10

Clasp-knife type of gait in a patient with DYT1 dystonia, with sudden hinging of the trunk upon gait initiation, and even when producing stepping movements while standing in place.Download Supplementary Video 10 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_10

Video 11

Deliberately slow and broad-based gait in a patient with stiff-person syndrome. Characteristic lumbar hyperlordosis is lacking in this patient.Download Supplementary Video 11 via http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/009649_Video_11

Supportive signs

As functional gait disorders often occur together with other types of functional disorders, it is helpful to search for additional inconsistent or incongruous neurologic findings.2 Moreover, several supportive signs can offer diagnostic support in patients with a functional gait disorder.27 A useful one is the expressive behavior including breath-holding and grimacing while standing or walking (originally labeled as huffing and puffing sign, although we prefer expressive behavior, as this does not have a negative connotation).28 This sign has an excellent specificity but poor sensitivity: in a cohort of 131 patients with a functional gait disorder (with the absence of pain), expressive behavior was present in 44%, whereas it was minimal or absent in 37 patients with an organic gait disorder.28 A recent study reported an even lower sensitivity: expressive behavior was only present in 14 of 60 patients (23%) with a functional gait disorder.3

Another supportive sign is the chair sign. In a small study with 9 patients with a functional gait disorder, 8 patients were able to propel themselves better when seated on an office chair with wheels compared with regular walking, which was not present in 9 control patients with parkinsonism.29 This test needs confirmation in larger studies, as we suspect that some organic gait disorders (such as task-specific gait dystonia or freezing of gait) may also yield a positive chair test, thus diminishing its specificity.

Conclusion

We have described a sign-based approach to better diagnose functional gait disorders. In this sign-based approach, presenting gait signs are taken as the starting point for a tailored search into the origin of the gait disorder. After identification of the presenting gait signs, clinical tests can subsequently bring out inconsistencies and incongruencies that may point out to a functional gait disorder. We hope that this will help clinicians during the diagnostic process in their daily clinical practice.

Study funding

No targeted funding reported.

Disclosure

J. Nonnekes is supported by a center of excellence grant of the Parkinson's Foundation through the Radboudumc Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders. E. Růžička was supported by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, grant AZV ČR 16-29651. T. Serranová was supported by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, grant AZV ČR 16-29651. S.G. Reich reports no relevant disclosures. B.R. Bloem is supported by a center of excellence grant of the Parkinson's Foundation through the Radboudumc Centre of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders. M. Hallett is supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Intramural Program. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.

Appendix Authors

Table

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

  • The Article Processing Charge was funded by Radboud University Nijmegen.

  • Received January 6, 2020.
  • Accepted in final form April 7, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Edwards MJ,
    2. Bhatia KP
    . Functional (psychogenic) movement disorders: merging mind and brain. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:250–260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Baik JS,
    2. Lang AE
    . Gait abnormalities in psychogenic movement disorders. Mov Disord 2007;22:395–399.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Baizabal-Carvallo JF,
    2. Alonso-Juarez M,
    3. Jankovic J
    . Functional gait disorders, clinical phenomenology, and classification. Neurol Sci 2019;41:911–915.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Stone J,
    2. Carson A,
    3. Duncan R, et al
    . Which neurological diseases are most likely to be associated with “symptoms unexplained by organic disease.” J Neurol 2012;259:33–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Balint B,
    2. van Winsen LML,
    3. Bhatia KP,
    4. Bloem BR
    . Psychogenic movement disorders: gait is a give-away!. Mov Disord Clin Prac 2014;1:110–111.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nicholson TR,
    2. Aybek S,
    3. Craig T, et al
    . Life events and escape in conversion disorder. Psychol Med 2016;46:2617–2626.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ludwig L,
    2. Pasman JA,
    3. Nicholson T, et al
    . Stressful life events and maltreatment in conversion (functional neurological) disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Lancet Psychiatry 2018;5:307–320.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Morgante F,
    2. Edwards MJ,
    3. Espay AJ
    . Psychogenic movement disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2013;19:1383–1396.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Espay AJ,
    2. Aybek S,
    3. Carson A, et al
    . Current concepts in diagnosis and treatment of functional neurological disorders. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:1132–1141.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hallett M
    . Psychogenic movement disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharm 2015;25:S153.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Nonnekes J,
    2. Goselink RJM,
    3. Ruzicka E,
    4. Fasano A,
    5. Nutt JG,
    6. Bloem BR
    . Neurological disorders of gait, balance and posture: a sign-based approach. Nat Rev Neurol 2018;14:183–189.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hayes MW,
    2. Graham S,
    3. Heldorf P,
    4. de Moore G,
    5. Morris JGL
    . A video review of the diagnosis of psychogenic gait: appendix and commentary. Mov Disord 1999;14:914–921.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gupta A,
    2. Lang AE
    . Psychogenic movement disorders. Curr Opin Neurol 2009;22:430–436.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Araujo R,
    2. van de Warrenburg B,
    3. Lang A,
    4. Lees A,
    5. Bloem B
    . The Waiting Room: neurological observations made outside the movement disorder specialist's consulting office. Pract Neurol 2019;19:295–301.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Boogaarts HD,
    2. Abdo WF,
    3. Bloem BR
    . “Recumbent” gait: relationship to the phenotype of “astasia-abasia?” Mov Disord 2007;22:2121–2122.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Nonnekes J,
    2. Goselink R,
    3. Weerdesteyn V,
    4. Bloem BR
    . The retropulsion test: a good evaluation of postural instability in Parkinson's disease? J Parkinsons Dis 2015;5:43–47.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Albanese A
    . The clinical expression of primary dystonia. J Neurol 2003;250:1145–1151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Nonnekes J,
    2. Ruzicka E,
    3. Nieuwboer A,
    4. Hallett M,
    5. Fasano A,
    6. Bloem BR
    . Compensation strategies for gait impairments in Parkinson disease: a review. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:718–725.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ramos VF,
    2. Karp BI,
    3. Hallett M
    . Tricks in dystonia: ordering the complexity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:987–993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Nonnekes J,
    2. Janssen S,
    3. Bloem BR
    . Superficial brain stimulation to overcome freezing of gait in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2017;88:1681–1682.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Ruzicka E,
    2. Zarubova K,
    3. Nutt JG,
    4. Bloem BR
    . “Silly walks” in Parkinson's disease: unusual presentation of dopaminergic-induced dyskinesias. Mov Disord 2011;26:1782–1784.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wilcox RA,
    2. Winkler S,
    3. Lohmann K,
    4. Klein C
    . Whispering dysphonia in an Australian family (DYT4): a clinical and genetic reappraisal. Mov Disord 2011;26:2404–2408.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. McKeon A,
    2. Robinson MT,
    3. McEvoy KM, et al
    . Stiff-man syndrome and variants: clinical course, treatments, and outcomes. Arch Neurol 2012;69:230–238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Brown P,
    2. Rothwell JC,
    3. Marsden CD
    . The stiff leg syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;62:31–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Simon DK,
    2. Nishino S,
    3. Scammell TE
    . Mistaken diagnosis of psychogenic gait disorder in a man with status cataplecticus (“limp man syndrome”). Mov Disord 2004;19:838–840.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Daum C,
    2. Gheorghita F,
    3. Spatola M, et al
    . Interobserver agreement and validity of bedside “positive signs” for functional weakness, sensory and gait disorders in conversion disorder: a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosur Ps 2015;86:425–430.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Laub HN,
    2. Dwivedi AK,
    3. Revilla FJ,
    4. Duker AP,
    5. Pecina-Jacob C,
    6. Espay AJ
    . Diagnostic performance of the “huffing and puffing” sign in functional (psychogenic) movement disorders. Mov Disord Clin Prac 2015;2:29–32.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Okun MS,
    2. Rodriguez RL,
    3. Foote KD,
    4. Fernandez HH
    . The “chair test” to aid in the diagnosis of psychogenic gait disorders. Neurologist 2007;13:87–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

  • Author response: Functional gait disorders: A sign-based approach
    • Jorik Nonnekes, MD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Centre; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour; Department of Rehabilitation
    • Bastiaan R. Bloem, MD, PhD, 1Radboud University Medical Centre; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour; Department of Neurology
    • Mark Hallett, MD, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (Bethesda, MD)
    Submitted July 14, 2020
  • Reader response: Functional gait disorders: A sign-based approach
    • José Fidel Baizabal-Carvallo, neurologist, movement disorders specialist, University of Guanajuato, campus León (Mexico)
    • Marlene Alonso-Juarez, Physician, National Polytechnique Institute (Mexico City)
    Submitted June 30, 2020
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Glossary
    • Diagnosing a functional gait disorder
    • A sign-based diagnostic approach
    • Potential pitfalls
    • Supportive signs
    • Conclusion
    • Study funding
    • Disclosure
    • Appendix Authors
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations A Clinical and Genetic Study

Dr. Robert Shapiro and Dr. Amynah Pradhan

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • Clinical neurology examination
  • Gait disorders/ataxia
  • Conversion

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 100 (6)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise