Comparison of ice pack test and single-fiber EMG diagnostic accuracy in patients referred for myasthenic ptosis
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of ice pack test (IPT) and single-fiber EMG (SF-EMG) in patients with suspected ocular myasthenia (OM) presenting with ptosis.
Methods We studied consecutive patients referred for the clinical suspicion of OM. Patients underwent IPT and stimulated SF-EMG on the orbicularis oculi muscle. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of IPT, SF-EMG, and their combination.
Results We included 155 patients, 102 with OM and 53 with other diagnosis (OD). The IPT had a sensitivity of 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79–93) and a specificity of 79% (95% CI 68–90). SF-EMG showed a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI 89–98) and a specificity of 79% (95% CI 68–90). Overall, IPT and SF-EMG showed discordant results in 30 cases, 16 OM and 14 OD. The combination of IPT and SF-EMG, using the positivity of at least one test for OM diagnosis, increased the sensitivity to 98% (95% CI 95–100), reducing the specificity to 66% (95% CI 53–78), whereas using the positivity of both tests, we obtained a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI 75–90) and a specificity of 92% (95% CI 85–99). The negativity of both tests had a 94% (95% CI 87–100) negative predictive value. Comparison of the areas under the curve showed no differences in the diagnostic accuracy of IPT, SF-EMG, and their combinations.
Conclusions IPT and SF-EMG have similar diagnostic accuracy in patients with OM presenting with ptosis. The negativity of both tests strongly suggests another diagnosis.
Classification of evidence This study provides Class I evidence that both the IPT and SF-EMG accurately identify patients with OM.
Glossary
- AChEI=
- acetylcholinesterase inhibitor;
- AChR-ab=
- acetylcholine receptor antibody;
- AUC=
- area under the curve;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- IPT=
- ice pack test;
- MRD=
- margin reflex distance;
- NPV=
- negative predictive value;
- OD=
- other diagnosis;
- OM=
- ocular myasthenia;
- PPV=
- positive predictive value;
- RNS=
- repetitive nerve stimulation;
- SF-EMG=
- single-fiber EMG
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 563
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received December 19, 2019.
- Accepted in final form April 14, 2020.
- © 2020 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
- Author response: Comparison of ice-pack test and single fiber EMG diagnostic accuracy in patients referred for myasthenic ptosis
- Maria Pia Giannoccaro, Neurologist, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna and Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna
- Rocco Liguori, Neurologist, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna and Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna
Submitted September 05, 2020 - Reader response: Comparison of ice-pack test and single fiber EMG diagnostic accuracy in patients referred for myasthenic ptosis
- Nicholas Silvestri, Assoc. Prof. of Neurology, Asst. Dean for Student & Academic Affairs, Dept. of Neurology, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences (Buffalo, NY)
Submitted September 01, 2020
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.