A 49-year-old woman presented to the orthopedic department with a chief complaint of severe low back pain for 2 years, with no neurologic deficiency on physical examination. Laboratory investigations revealed no abnormities. MRI (Figure 1, A and D) showed an intradural mass displacing the posterior spinal cord at the L3 level, leading to lumbar stenosis. Contrast-enhanced MRI (Figure 1, B and E) showed obvious marginal enhancement. CT (Figure 1, C and F) showed that the mass was calcified and the nerve root was compressed. The mass containing tophaceous deposits was removed surgically. As shown in the pathology slide (figure 2), the diagnosis was gouty tophus eventually, which is rarely presented in the spinal canal.1,2 The pain disappeared after the operation.
Magnetic resonance imaging (A and D, arrow) showed an intradural mass displacing the posterior spinal cord at the L3 level, leading to lumbar stenosis. Contrast-enhanced MRI (B and E, arrow) showed obvious marginal enhancement. CT (C and F, arrow) showed the mass was calcified and the nerve root was compressed.
Study Funding
Study funding by the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81902741), the Science Foundation of Shandong Province (project ZR2019BH077).
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Appendix Authors
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Teaching slides links.lww.com/WNL/B208
- © 2020 American Academy of Neurology
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
