Abstract
Objective Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is protean in its manifestations, affecting nearly every organ system. However, nervous system involvement and its effect on disease outcome are poorly characterized. The objective of this study was to determine whether neurologic syndromes are associated with increased risk of inpatient mortality.
Methods A total of 581 hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, neurologic involvement, and brain imaging were compared to hospitalized non-neurologic patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Four patterns of neurologic manifestations were identified: acute stroke, new or recrudescent seizures, altered mentation with normal imaging, and neuro-COVID-19 complex. Factors present on admission were analyzed as potential predictors of in-hospital mortality, including sociodemographic variables, preexisting comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory values, and pattern of neurologic manifestations. Significant predictors were incorporated into a disease severity score. Patients with neurologic manifestations were matched with patients of the same age and disease severity to assess the risk of death.
Results A total of 4,711 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were admitted to one medical system in New York City during a 6-week period. Of these, 581 (12%) had neurologic issues of sufficient concern to warrant neuroimaging. These patients were compared to 1,743 non-neurologic patients with COVID-19 matched for age and disease severity admitted during the same period. Patients with altered mentation (n = 258, p = 0.04, odds ratio [OR] 1.39, confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.86) or radiologically confirmed stroke (n = 55, p = 0.001, OR 3.1, CI 1.65–5.92) had a higher risk of mortality than age- and severity-matched controls.
Conclusions The incidence of altered mentation or stroke on admission predicts a modest but significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality independent of disease severity. While other biomarker factors also predict mortality, measures to identify and treat such patients may be important in reducing overall mortality of COVID-19.
Glossary
- AST=
- aspartate aminotransferase;
- BMI=
- body mass index;
- BUN=
- blood urea nitrogen;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- COVID-19=
- coronavirus disease 2019;
- CRP=
- C-reactive protein;
- HR=
- hazard ratio;
- ICD-10=
- International Classification of Diseases–10;
- INR=
- international normalized ratio;
- OR=
- odds ratio;
- SARS-CoV-2=
- severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Pulmonary symptoms are the most common in-hospital presentation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Severely affected patients may have damage to the kidneys, liver, or heart.1,2 Since the initial outbreak in Wuhan, China, neurologic involvement has also been described: of 214 cases, 45% of hospitalized patients presented with headache or dizziness, while 5% of severely affected patients had a cerebrovascular accident.1 Other nervous system manifestations have been identified, including anosmia, increased seizure frequency, recrudescence of stroke symptoms, and Guillain-Barré syndrome.3,–,8 There are reports of large vessel occlusion in younger patients, necrotizing encephalitis, acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis, and meningoencephalitis, although these appear to be relatively rare.9,–,12 Clinical and pathologic studies that have tested for the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the brain or CSF have yielded variable results.13 It remains unclear whether acute neurologic manifestations affect mortality of SARS-CoV-2 illness and whether this risk is present in the absence of imaging findings.
The objective of this study was to evaluate factors present on admission—sociodemographic data, medical comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory assessments, and neurologic syndromes—as potential predictors of in-hospital mortality. We hypothesize that clinical evidence of diffuse brain impairment, independent of disease severity and in the absence of imaging findings, is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. The rationale behind this supposition is that a reduced level of arousal has been previously shown to increase mortality risk from other acute adult medical admission.14 Moreover, we suggest that the development of an acute stroke in the context of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection also incurs greater risk of mortality independent of age and disease severity. Stroke has been previously shown to be associated with an increased risk of mortality in other infectious disease processes.15
Methods
Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents
This is a retrospective study of all patients admitted to 4 hospitals within the Montefiore Health System between March 1 and April 16, 2020, with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study received approval from our institutional ethical standards committee on human experimentation. Written informed consent was waived by our institutional ethical standards committee given the retrospective design of the study. Information on demographics, comorbidities, admission laboratory values, admission medications, admission supplemental oxygen orders, discharge, and mortality was identified through a health care surveillance software package (Clinical Looking Glass; Streamline Health, Atlanta, GA) and review of the primary medical records.16
All patients with real-time reverse transcriptase PCR–positive assay testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA were included. Patients not admitted or who died before admission were excluded because they seldom had a full panel of laboratory studies and full neurologic evaluation could not be assessed. For patients with multiple admissions, only the last reported was considered for analysis. Data were captured on May 7, 2020; therefore, follow-up varied from 3 weeks to 80 days.
The neurologic manifestations cohort consisted of patients exhibiting neurologic conditions of sufficient severity to warrant a neurologically motivated radiographic imaging study—CT, MRI, or diagnostic cerebral angiography—or neurologic consultation. Patients without imaging were placed into the non-neurologic cohort.
We reasoned that different neurologic syndromes may have different prognoses and placed patients with acute stroke confirmed on imaging, new-onset seizures, or recrudescent seizures in patients with epilepsy, and incidental brain lesions not related to SARS-CoV-2 illness, into separate groups. Patients without imaging findings or neurophysiologic abnormalities were divided into those with altered mentation (cognition or arousal) and those with normal mentation but well-documented neurologic signs and symptoms compatible with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), defined as headache, anosmia, ageusia, chemesthesis, vertigo, presyncope, paresthesias, cranial nerve abnormalities, ataxia, dysautonomia, and skeletal muscle injury.
The stroke cohort was defined as patients with CT angiography or cerebral angiography confirming blockage of an intracranial vessel or CT/MRI findings consistent with acute or subacute infarcts, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage. The seizure cohort was based on a careful review of the record by senior epilepsy neurologists, who confirmed the presence of overt seizures or status epilepticus, and the presence or absence of a history of epilepsy. Anatomic brain lesions not related to SARS-CoV-2 illness were defined as the presence of subdural hematoma, brain tumor, chronic infarction, or nonspecific nonvascular territory lesions in the cortex or white matter. All imaging findings were established through a review by 2 independent neuroradiologists.
The presence of altered mentation was determined through a review of the notes documenting the history and physical examination generated by emergency department physicians, admitting physicians, or members of the neurology or neurosurgery service when a consultation was requested. Patients were placed into the altered mentation cohort if there was evidence for impaired cognition (defined as disorientation, confusion, agitation, or delirium) or for impaired arousal (defined as drowsiness, somnolence, lethargy, or obtundation). The neuro-COVID-19 complex was defined as normal orientation and arousal with signs and symptoms commonly associated with COVID-19 (including headache, anosmia, ageusia, chemesthesis, vertigo, presyncope, paresthesias, cranial nerve abnormalities, ataxia, dysautonomia, and skeletal muscle injury).
In-hospital deaths and deaths in the National Death Registry were used to collect mortality. Only laboratory values obtained on admission were included. The comorbidities chosen were those used in the Charlson Comorbidity Index using the ICD-10.15,16 Every patient's medical record was queried for diagnoses occurring within 5 years of the index admission.
Statistical Analysis
All analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS (v26.0). For statistical analysis, we represented continuous measurements as means (SD) or as medians (interquartile ranges) and categorical variables as numbers (percentages).17 Comparisons between non-neurologic and neurologic groups were performed via 2-sided t tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, or χ2 testing as appropriate. No data imputation was made for missing values.16
Our primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. We first performed univariate analysis on potentially predictive candidates. Factors that were significant on initial univariate analysis were then evaluated for independence using multivariate logistic regression.
Our primary analysis utilized a 1:3 matched-control design. For each of the 581 patients with neurologic manifestations, a computer algorithm performed a random search of the remaining 4,130 patients to identify 3 patients having the same age and COVID-19 severity score but no neurologic manifestations, generating a matched-control cohort of 1,743 patients. We then compared the neurologic manifestations cohort to the matched controls. Because each patient had matching controls, subsets of patients within the neurologic manifestations cohort were compared to their respective subsets of controls, thereby maintaining a match in age and severity score. We defined statistical significance as a p value less than 0.05.
In a second analysis, we used factors found to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in the multivariate analysis to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for death using a Cox proportional hazards model.18 The number of days from admission to in-hospital death was used as the time-to-event data. Patients discharged from the hospital were right-censored. We included 15 independent variables that we considered potentially relevant to in-hospital mortality.
Data Availability
Data not published within the article are available in a public repository and include digital object identifiers. The anonymized data set is available at Dryad at doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7d7wm37sz. Further anonymized data can be shared by request from any qualified investigator.
Results
During a 6-week period between March 1 and April 16, 2020, a total of 4,711 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were hospitalized at 4 hospitals within the Montefiore Health System. Among these, 581 (12%) individuals had neurologic manifestations and neuroimaging studies. These patients constituted the neurologic manifestations cohort and included those with altered mentation (n = 258) (44% of the neurologic group and 5.5% of the total SARS-CoV-2 group), normal mentation with other neurologic signs and symptoms compatible with COVID-19 (neuro-COVID-19 complex) (n = 216) (37% of the neurologic group and 4.6% of the total SARS-CoV-2 group), stroke (n = 55) (9% of the neurologic group and 1.2% of the total SARS-CoV-2 group), seizures (n = 26) (4% of the neurologic group and 0.7% of the total SARS-CoV-2 group), and other brain lesions (n = 26) (4% of the neurologic group and 0.6% of the total SARS-CoV-2 group).
Out of the 258 patients in the altered mentation group, 61 (23.6%) had no clear toxic, metabolic disturbances or history of dementia or other premorbid cognitive disturbances. Out of the 55 stroke cases, 36 corresponded to large vessel occlusions, 8 (22.2%) received IV thrombolysis, 12 (33.3%) underwent endovascular thrombectomy, and 3 exhibited hemorrhagic transformation. Furthermore, 31 (56.4%) patients of the stroke cohort did not have any underlying comorbidities.
Predictors of Mortality
We applied univariate analysis across the entire cohort to assess the potential associations with in-hospital mortality of sociodemographics, comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory values, and CNS manifestations (table 1). Among the potential predictors of mortality were male sex, a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, or renal disease, older age, hypoxia, fever, or hypotension, and abnormalities of laboratory values reflecting impairment of the lungs, liver, kidneys, coagulation cascades, and the immune system.16
Univariate Analysis of Predictors for Mortality in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
All variables with a p < 0.100 on the univariate categorical analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression, which demonstrated that on admission, hypotension, advanced age, elevated serum levels of creatinine or C-reactive protein (CRP), hypoxia, reduced troponin, platelet count, increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), deranged sodium, reduced lymphocyte count, high body mass index (BMI), and male sex were significant independent predictors for an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (table 2).19 Findings consistent with acute stroke (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 3.49, confidence interval [CI] 2.9–4.1) and altered mentation (p = 0.002, OR 1.61, CI 1.3–1.9) were significant predictors for an increased risk of in-hospital mortality independent of the other factors (table 2).
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of In-Hospital Mortality Predictors in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Predictors of Neurologic Manifestations
We also compared the incidence of the various measures as potential correlates of neurologic manifestations. There was a significant association between altered mentation and increasing age, Black race, Latino ethnicity, history of stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and renal disease. Other significant correlates were mean arterial pressure <70 mm Hg, D-dimer >3 mg/L, platelets <150,000 per mm,3 international normalized ratio (INR) >1.2, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) >30 mg/dL, creatinine >1.5 µmol/L, procalcitonin >0.1 ng/ml, and troponin >0.1 ng/mL (table 3). Patients with stroke had similar characteristics to the larger non-neurologic cohort except for a significantly higher percentage of patients with D-dimer levels >3 mg/L (55% vs 30%, p = 0.001, 95% CI 1.6–5.0, table 4). Being younger (< 60 years [OR 0.454, 95% CI 0.23–0.895, p = 0.03]) and having IL-6 levels over 150 pg/ml (OR 4.959, 95% CI 1.324–18.576, p = 0.027) were independent predictors of seizures in patients with COVID-19 (table e-1) [available from Dryad: doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7d7wm37sz]).16
Distribution of Variables in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–Positive Patients With Altered Mentation
Distribution of Variables in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–Positive Patients With Stroke
Disease Severity Score
In order to test the hypothesis that altered mentation or stroke carry an additional risk of in-hospital mortality, we sought to account for underlying disease severity in the most straightforward fashion possible. On univariate analysis, 24 factors had a significant association with mortality (table 1), while multivariate regression demonstrated that 14 of these were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality on admission: increasing age, hypotension, hypoxemia, elevated serum levels of creatinine, CRP, and D-dimer, and relative thrombocytopenia (table 2).
Based on the respective ORs of these variables, we created a scoring system reflecting underlying disease severity.16 Our goal was to capture the impairment in multiple organ systems without overfitting the data. The score included (1) age by decile, so that patients above 60, 70, or 80 received 1, 2, or 3 points, respectively; (2) hypotension, so that calculated mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 80, 70, and 60 received 1, 2, or 3 points, respectively; (3) impaired pulmonary function, reflected in oxygen saturations below 94%, received 1 point; (4) impaired renal function, reflected in BUN greater than 30, received 1 point; (5) coagulopathy, reflected as an INR greater than 1.2 and increased inflammatory response, reflected in CRP levels greater than 10, received 1 point. The maximum score was 10 points (table e-2 [available from Dryad: doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7d7wm37sz]).
This scoring system was applied to the entire cohort, and the majority of patients were distributed in the first 3 points of the score and, moreover, the severity score corresponded to a linear increase for in-hospital mortality over the range of 0–10 points (figure).
(A) General distribution. (B) Mortality distribution.
Matched Case–Control Analysis
For each of the 581 patients with neurologic manifestations, a random search algorithm identified 3 age- and severity-matched patients, generating a cohort of 1,180 controls. Because age and severity score were deliberately matched, the distribution of age and disease severity was the same in the CNS groups and the matched-control group. Other variables were not explicitly matched, and exhibited small differences (table 5).
In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Neurologic Manifestations and Matched Controls
Within the neurologic manifestation groups, patients with stroke had the highest risk of in-hospital mortality, which was significantly higher than matched controls (49% vs 24%, p = 0.001, OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.65–5.92). The same was true for patients with altered mentation but the absence of imaging abnormalities (40% vs 33%, respectively, p = 0.04, OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04–1.86). There was a trend for patients presenting with impaired arousal to have a higher risk of mortality compared with those with impaired cognition, although this was not statistically significant. There was no significant increase in risk for patients with new or recurrent seizures, neuro-COVID-19 complex, or those with incidentally discovered brain lesions (table 5).
Cox Proportional Hazards Model
From the original set of 40 potential predictors of mortality, univariate analysis identified 24 that exhibited a significant correlation, and multivariate regression identified 14 as independent predictors of mortality. They also appear to combine in a broadly additive manner as demonstrated in the severity score and matched-control analysis. These considerations informed the choice of predictor variables in a Cox proportional hazards model. We included advanced age, male sex, and elevated BMI as all have been previously associated with poor clinical outcomes. We included blood pressure on admission, as it had the largest OR on multivariate analysis. We included platelets, given the potential role of coagulopathy in stroke, creatinine to capture kidney damage, AST to capture liver damage, CRP to capture inflammatory derangement, troponin to capture cardiac injury, along with lymphocyte count to capture immune system dysfunction. We also included stroke, altered mentation, and neuro-COVID-19 complex as potential predictors. Time to event was the time from admission to in-hospital death. Patients discharged from the hospital were right-censored.
Multiple factors were found independently associated with in-hospital mortality: hypotension (p < 0.0001, HR 4.39, CI 4.2–4.5), older age (p < 0.001, HR 2.61, CI 2.5–2.7), hypoxia (p < 0.001, HR 1.43, CI 1.3–1.5), elevated creatinine (p < 0.001, HR 1.5, CI 1.4–1.6), elevated CRP (p < 0.001, HR 1.42 CI 1.3–1.6), lymphocytopenia (p < 0.00, HR 1.37, CI 1.2–1.5), elevated troponin (p = 0.001, HR 1.34, CI 1.2–1.5), hyponatremia or hypernatremia (p = 0.01, HR 1.23, CI 1.1–1.4), thrombocytopenia (p = 0.003, HR 1.23, CI 1.1–1.4), and elevated AST (p = 0.01, HR 1.17, CI 1.0–1.3) (table 6). Altered mentation was a significant independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (p < 0.003, HR 1.37, CI 1.2–1.6), with the HR suggesting that the risk is similar to that imposed by cardiac injury. Stroke is also a significant predictor of mortality (p = 0.004, HR 1.75, CI 1.4–2.1), with the HR between hypoxia and age older than 65.
Cox Regression Analysis for Mortality Outcomes
Discussion
We present the largest inpatient cohort of SARS-CoV-2–infected patients to date, evaluating predictors of inpatient mortality as they relate to neurologic syndromes at presentation. The neurologic findings seen in this cohort were similar to other large cohort studies.6,20,21 A small but substantial subset of patients had associated neurologic presentations of sufficient severity to warrant imaging of the neuraxis. Although the majority had normal neuroimaging, the distinction between those with altered cognition or arousal and those exhibiting other neurologic signs and symptoms associated with COVID-19 infection (neuro-COVID-19 complex) appears to be important.
The etiology of altered mentation in COVID-19 is not clear. In this study, there was an association between altered mentation and hypotension, renal impairment as demonstrated by elevated BUN and creatinine, disturbed coagulation as evidenced by elevated D-dimer levels, prolonged INR and reduced platelet counts, and increased inflammation as evidenced by elevated levels of procalcitonin. These biomarker abnormalities are associated with multiorgan system failure and more severe SARS-CoV-2 illness. These patients were less likely to have traditional symptoms such as fever or decreased oxygen saturation. It is unclear whether these findings are exclusive to COVID-19 infection. Other studies have shown that delirium is a predictor for increased inpatient mortality irrespective of underlying diagnosis, particularly in elderly patients.22 Even when controlling for biomarker abnormalities, patients with impaired cognition or arousal without abnormal neuroimaging findings exhibited an increased risk of inpatient mortality, suggesting that other yet-to-be determined mechanisms may be at play. Irrespective of the etiologic factors, such neurologic presentations can be subtle but important indications of more severe SARS-CoV-2 illness and should be taken seriously in hospital emergency departments. While other biomarker findings such as hypotension, D-dimer, coagulopathy, and renal failure may be more predictive of illness severity, and mortality, neurologic syndromes portend a higher risk of mortality, and can be easily assessed early in a patient encounter. The biomarkers we found to be most correlative with poor outcome and potentially modifiable such as BUN, INR, oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressure, and CRP could serve as potential targets for future research for treatments or management paradigms.16
Stroke with concomitant SARS-CoV-2 infection is a rare but serious complication of the illness.12 In our cohort, stroke represented 9% of our neurologic cohort and 1% of all SARS-CoV-2–infected patients. This subgroup was more likely to have elevated D-dimer and CRP compared with controls. Stroke with SARS-CoV-2 infection had an even higher risk of inpatient mortality and these individuals likely represent a more severe manifestation of the illness. The etiology of stroke and SARS-CoV-2 infection is likely multifactorial, with some that can be attributed to the unique COVID-19 coagulopathy, severe systemic inflammatory reactions, and patients with risk factors for stroke in which the illness can be a trigger. We discovered that more than half of the patients with stroke did not have underlying risk factors, which is highly unusual. This suggests like in other studies that SARS-CoV-2 infection is itself a risk factor for stroke.23 During the time period of the study, all patients with acute stroke were managed according to our institutional protocols and policies. Despite other changes to hospital throughput, the neurologic services remained stable. An important caveat to note is that all patients that carry the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke carry an increased risk of mortality compared to those without stroke on admission.24 The mortality risk therefore may be intrinsically predicated with the stroke diagnosis as compared to the SARS-CoV-2 infection itself.
Due to the retrospective nature of this study, there are potential limitations to this study. The majority of patients were a minority urban population and occurring at an epoch during a major surge period of the pandemic. This may bias the results toward higher mortality, as this was a great strain on treating hospitals at the time. This study was limited to evaluating inpatient mortality, therefore any deaths that occurred outside of our health care system may have been lost. The health system during this epoch was over total capacity for critical care beds but not over capacity for beds, which may have limited the number of patients receiving neurologic consultation, adequate neurologic examination documentation, and neurologic imaging. It is also possible that minor stroke cases could have been missed in severe SARS-CoV-2 illness. Therefore, this may underestimate the true number of patients with neurologic manifestations found in our cohort. Despite this, however, using a matched analysis, neurologic symptoms alone still predicted higher inpatient mortality. We therefore hypothesize that in a prospective study, during nonpandemic volumes, the predictive effect of neurologic manifestations on mortality may be greater than perceived in this study.
Unlike other studies, in our institution we did not find significant differences in mortality in our Black and Latinx populations when controlling for underlying comorbid illness.25,–,27 This further suggests that variations in outcome based on race and ethnicity are less tied to bias within health care and more likely a result of structural and systemic racism, leading to inequity of health as it pertains to comorbid conditions, and overall health of populations.28 These findings correspond in the neurologic realm as with SARS-CoV-2 infection itself.
To our knowledge, this is the largest study analyzing the neurologic manifestations of COVID-19 and their effect on mortality. Documented CNS manifestations such as encephalopathy, stroke, seizure, and syncope are relatively common, being present in at least 13% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, although the incidence is likely much higher. Within the spectrum of CNS manifestations, altered mentation and stroke confer a higher risk of mortality above the severity of underlying illness. The presence of these syndromes may represent a different clinically important syndromic expression of SARS-Cov-2 infection that carries a greater risk of mortality and may benefit from targeted treatment.
Study Funding
There were no sources of funding for this work.
Disclosure
None of the authors has any relevant financial conflicts to disclose. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Appendix Authors
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
↵* These authors contributed equally to this work.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.
- Received August 18, 2020.
- Accepted in final form November 24, 2020.
- Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
References
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.