Evaluation of Patient and Clinician Perspectives for New and Return Ambulatory Teleneurology Visits, with special attention to subspecialty differences (1307)
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective: To investigate adoption and perceived utility of video visits for new and return patients across neurologic subspecialties.
Background: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, utilization of teleneurology for ambulatory patients was limited. The pandemic presented an opportunity to evaluate ambulatory teleneurology visits for new and return patients in a suburban academic multi-subspecialty practice at a large scale.
Design/Methods: Adoption of video visits was assessed using clinician-level scheduling data from 3/22–5/16/2020. Perceived utility of video visits was explored via clinician survey and semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients/caregivers. Findings were compared across 5 subspecialties (epilepsy, headache, memory, movement disorders, and neuromuscular) and 2 visit types (new versus return).
Results: Video visits were adopted rapidly; all clinicians (n=65) integrated video visits into their workflow within the 6 weeks and 92% of visits were conducted via video. Utility of video visits was higher for return than new patient visits, as indicated by surveyed (n=48) and interviewed clinicians (n=30). Headache and memory had the highest adoption of video visits for both return and new patient visits. Neuromuscular had the lowest adoption of video for new patient visits and movement disorders for return patient visits. Clinicians felt it was easier to achieve similar physical exam, patient-clinician rapport, and perceived quality of care over video for return rather than new patient visits. Most patients/caregivers interviewed were satisfied with the care provided via video regardless of visit type, with the main limitation being the physical exam.
Conclusions: Teleneurology was robustly adopted for both new and return patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Return visits were preferred over new patient visits, but both were feasible. Headache and memory disorders had the highest levels of adoption between visit types potentially related to less dependence on physical examinations. We provide a foundation for developing targeted guidelines for sustaining teleneurology in ambulatory care post-pandemic.
Disclosure: Dr. Walter has nothing to disclose. An immediate family member of Samantha Kling has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Thermo Fisher Scientific. An immediate family member of Samantha Kling has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care. An immediate family member of Erika Saliba Gustafsson has received research support from Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. Dr. Yang has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Acadia. The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC). The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Pacific Northwest Udall Center . The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Biogen/Parkinson's Study Group . The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Eli Lily . The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Michael J. Fox Foundation For Parkinson's Research . The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Sanofi . Dr. Miller-Kuhlmann has nothing to disclose. Cati Brown-Johnson has nothing to disclose. Jonathan Shaw has nothing to disclose. Steven Asch has nothing to disclose. The institution of an immediate family member of Marcy Winget has received research support from National Cancer Institute. The institution of Marcy Winget has received research support from StupskiFoundation. The institution of Marcy Winget has received research support from Stanford Health Care. Dr. Gold has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Stanford University. An immediate family member of Dr. Gold has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Stanford University.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.