Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • COVID-19
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • COVID-19
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

April 13, 2021; 96 (15 Supplement) Saturday, April 17

Evaluation of Patient and Clinician Perspectives for New and Return Ambulatory Teleneurology Visits, with special attention to subspecialty differences (1307)

Jessica Falco-Walter, Samantha Kling, Erika Saliba-Gustafsson, Laurice Yang, Rebecca Miller-Kuhlmann, Donn Garvert, Cati Brown-Johnson, Jonathan Shaw, Steven Asch, Marcy Winget, Carl Gold
First published April 13, 2021,
Jessica Falco-Walter
1Neurology and Neurological Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samantha Kling
2Evaluation Sciences Unit, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika Saliba-Gustafsson
2Evaluation Sciences Unit, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurice Yang
1Neurology and Neurological Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Miller-Kuhlmann
1Neurology and Neurological Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donn Garvert
2Evaluation Sciences Unit, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cati Brown-Johnson
2Evaluation Sciences Unit, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Shaw
2Evaluation Sciences Unit, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Asch
2Evaluation Sciences Unit, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcy Winget
2Evaluation Sciences Unit, Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carl Gold
1Neurology and Neurological Sciences
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Citation
Evaluation of Patient and Clinician Perspectives for New and Return Ambulatory Teleneurology Visits, with special attention to subspecialty differences (1307)
Jessica Falco-Walter, Samantha Kling, Erika Saliba-Gustafsson, Laurice Yang, Rebecca Miller-Kuhlmann, Donn Garvert, Cati Brown-Johnson, Jonathan Shaw, Steven Asch, Marcy Winget, Carl Gold
Neurology Apr 2021, 96 (15 Supplement) 1307;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
0

Share

  • Article
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective: To investigate adoption and perceived utility of video visits for new and return patients across neurologic subspecialties.

Background: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, utilization of teleneurology for ambulatory patients was limited. The pandemic presented an opportunity to evaluate ambulatory teleneurology visits for new and return patients in a suburban academic multi-subspecialty practice at a large scale.

Design/Methods: Adoption of video visits was assessed using clinician-level scheduling data from 3/22–5/16/2020. Perceived utility of video visits was explored via clinician survey and semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients/caregivers. Findings were compared across 5 subspecialties (epilepsy, headache, memory, movement disorders, and neuromuscular) and 2 visit types (new versus return).

Results: Video visits were adopted rapidly; all clinicians (n=65) integrated video visits into their workflow within the 6 weeks and 92% of visits were conducted via video. Utility of video visits was higher for return than new patient visits, as indicated by surveyed (n=48) and interviewed clinicians (n=30). Headache and memory had the highest adoption of video visits for both return and new patient visits. Neuromuscular had the lowest adoption of video for new patient visits and movement disorders for return patient visits. Clinicians felt it was easier to achieve similar physical exam, patient-clinician rapport, and perceived quality of care over video for return rather than new patient visits. Most patients/caregivers interviewed were satisfied with the care provided via video regardless of visit type, with the main limitation being the physical exam.

Conclusions: Teleneurology was robustly adopted for both new and return patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Return visits were preferred over new patient visits, but both were feasible. Headache and memory disorders had the highest levels of adoption between visit types potentially related to less dependence on physical examinations. We provide a foundation for developing targeted guidelines for sustaining teleneurology in ambulatory care post-pandemic.

Disclosure: Dr. Walter has nothing to disclose. An immediate family member of Samantha Kling has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Thermo Fisher Scientific. An immediate family member of Samantha Kling has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care. An immediate family member of Erika Saliba Gustafsson has received research support from Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. Dr. Yang has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Acadia. The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC). The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Pacific Northwest Udall Center . The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Biogen/Parkinson's Study Group . The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Eli Lily . The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Michael J. Fox Foundation For Parkinson's Research . The institution of Dr. Yang has received research support from Sanofi . Dr. Miller-Kuhlmann has nothing to disclose. Cati Brown-Johnson has nothing to disclose. Jonathan Shaw has nothing to disclose. Steven Asch has nothing to disclose. The institution of an immediate family member of Marcy Winget has received research support from National Cancer Institute. The institution of Marcy Winget has received research support from StupskiFoundation. The institution of Marcy Winget has received research support from Stanford Health Care. Dr. Gold has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Stanford University. An immediate family member of Dr. Gold has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Stanford University.

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 98 (21)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Neurology: Education
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2022 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise