Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • COVID-19
    • Practice Current
    • Practice Buzz
    • Without Borders
    • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • COVID-19
    • Practice Current
    • Practice Buzz
    • Without Borders
    • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

January 12, 2021; 96 (2) What's Happening

What's Happening in Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation

First published January 11, 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011260
Full PDF
Citation
What's Happening in Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
Neurology Jan 2021, 96 (2) 57; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011260

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
0

Share

  • Article
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Papers appearing in the November 2020 issue

Lymphocyte recovery after fingolimod discontinuation in patients with MS

Objective

To investigate the dynamics of immune cells recovery after treatment discontinuation of fingolimod in real-life clinical practice, we analyzed the course of lymphocyte reconstitution and its potential influencing factors in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

We analyzed leukocyte, lymphocyte, and granulocyte counts of 58 patients at 3, 6, and 12 months after fingolimod cessation and the following parameters as potential risk factors for a prolonged lymphopenia up to 12 months: age; sex; Expanded Disability Status Scale and disease duration at the time of fingolimod start; type and number of previous immunomodulatory treatments; fingolimod treatment duration; lymphocyte count at baseline before fingolimod, at fingolimod stop, and at the time of therapy switch; time interval between fingolimod cessation and new treatment initiation; type of the follow-up immunomodulatory treatment; and corticosteroid administration after fingolimod cessation.

Results

All patients showed a decline in the lymphocyte count under fingolimod with no relevant leukopenia or neutropenia. One year after discontinuation, still 22% of the patients were lymphopenic and 54% of them did not reach 80% of the baseline lymphocyte value. Low lymphocyte counts before fingolimod start, under fingolimod, and at therapy switch, successive treatment with rituximab, and pretreatment with mitoxantrone were significantly associated with a prolonged immune cell recovery.

Conclusions

Prolonged lymphopenia after fingolimod cessation exists in a subgroup of patients with MS and should be considered in clinical practice, particularly when changing treatment regimens.

NPub.org/NN/9602a

Cladribine vs other drugs in MS: Merging randomized trial with real-life data

Objective

Cladribine tablets were tested against placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this study, the effectiveness of cladribine vs other approved drugs in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) was compared by matching RCT with observational data.

Methods

Data from the pivotal trial assessing cladribine tablets vs placebo (CLARITY) were propensity score matched to data from the Italian multicenter database i-MuST. This database included 3,150 patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 at 24 Italian MS centers who started a disease-modifying drug. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) over 2 years from treatment start and the 24-week confirmed disability progression were compared between patients treated with cladribine and other approved drugs (interferon, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, natalizumab, and dimethyl fumarate), with comparisons with placebo as a reference. Treatment effects were estimated by the inverse probability weighting negative binomial regression model for ARR and Cox model for disability progression. The treatment effect has also been evaluated according to baseline disease activity.

Results

All weighted baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. All drugs tested had an effect vs placebo close to that detected in the RCT. Patients treated with cladribine had a significantly lower ARR compared with interferon (relapse ratio [RR] = 0.48; p < 0.001), glatiramer acetate (RR = 0.49; p < 0.001), and dimethyl fumarate (RR = 0.6; p = 0.001); a similar ARR to that with fingolimod (RR = 0.74; p = 0.24); and a significantly higher ARR than natalizumab (RR = 2.13; p = 0.014), confirming the results obtained by indirect treatment comparisons from RCTs (network meta-analyses). The relative effect of cladribine tablets 10 mg (cumulative dose 3.5 mg/kg over 2 years) was higher in patients with high disease activity vs all treatments except fingolimod and natalizumab. Effects on disability progression were largely nonsignificant, probably because of the lack of power for such analysis.

Conclusion

In patients with RRMS, cladribine tablets showed lower ARR compared with matched patients who started interferon, glatiramer acetate, or dimethyl fumarate; was similar to fingolimod; and was higher than natalizumab. The beneficial effect of cladribine tablets was generally amplified in the subgroup of patients with high disease activity.

Classification of evidence

This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with RRMS, cladribine-treated patients had lower ARR compared with interferon, glatiramer acetate, or dimethyl fumarate; similar ARR compared with fingolimod; and higher ARR compared with natalizumab.

NPub.org/NN/9602b

Most-Read Articles

As of November 10, 2020

MOG cell-based assay detects non-MS patients with inflammatory neurologic disease

P. Waters, M. Woodhall, K. C. O'Connor, et al. 2015;2:e89. doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000089

Aquaporin-4 autoimmunity

A. Zekeridou, V. A. Lennon 2015;2:e110. doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000110

Increased frequency of anti-Ma2 encephalitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

A. Vogrig, M. Fouret, B. Joubert, et al. 2019;6:e604. doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000604

Guillain-Barré syndrome related to COVID-19 infection

P. Alberti, S. Beretta, M. Piatti, et al. 2020;7:e741. doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000741

Does time equal vision in the acute treatment of a cohort of AQP4 and MOG optic neuritis?

H. Stiebel-Kalish, M. A. Hellmann, M. Mimouni, et al. 2019;6:e572. doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000572

  • Received November 10, 2020.
  • Accepted in final form October 25, 2020.
  • © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
View Abstract

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.

  • Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • 200 words maximum.
  • 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Disputes & Debates Submission Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Lymphocyte recovery after fingolimod discontinuation in patients with MS
    • Cladribine vs other drugs in MS: Merging randomized trial with real-life data
    • Most-Read Articles
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 96 (4)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2021 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise