Child Neurology: Pheochromocytoma Unveiled by Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome in a Child With Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

A 17-year-old right-handed boy of Korean descent developed sudden onset of palpitations with a general feeling of tremulousness and subsequent flushing. This was followed by a thunderclap headache described as if his entire head exploded and the worst pain of his life. This was accompanied by vertigo, nausea, photophobia, dyspnea, and right ocular pain with conjunctival erythema and binocular blurry vision. The latter symptoms improved after 15 minutes.
Two days later, the patient sought medical attention due to improved but persistent occipital and right-sided headache. A head CT and CT angiogram were performed. His CT was unremarkable while his CT angiogram showed multivessel irregular narrowing without hemorrhage (figure, A). He was transferred to our tertiary center for further evaluation and management.
(A) Contrast-enhanced CT angiogram performed at presentation to evaluate thunderclap headache shows abnormal irregular narrowing (arrowheads) of multiple segments of the bilateral intracranial arteries including left anterior cerebral artery, bilateral middle cerebral artery, and supraclinoid right internal carotid artery. (B) A 3D fat-suppressed postcontrast T1 sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using different flip-angle evolutions (SPACE) MRI obtained the following day shows no substantial vessel wall thickening or enhancement, accounting for minor subtraction artifact (vessel lumina are black on this subtraction image). The MRI was repeated 3 months after presentation, and (C) time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography showed substantial overall improvement of the previously identified multivessel irregular narrowing. Negligible luminal irregularity along the distal left M1 segment persisted (*). Once again, no vessel wall thickening or enhancement was seen (D), confirming the absence of any large vessel vasculopathy. The right suprarenal mass identified during the initial evaluation was found to be intensely I-123 MIBG-avid (E), compatible with pheochromocytoma, later confirmed via pathology. All CNS images are coronal views at the same position through the sella turcica and circle of Willis. Ca = carotid artery; P = pituitary gland; S = suprarenal mass; V = lateral ventricle.
The patient reported a similar episode 5 months previously. While swimming, he had sudden onset of palpitations and a severe occipital headache accompanied by vertigo and binocular blurriness. This episode resolved with rest and acetaminophen. He endorsed other milder similar episodes of exercise-induced headache in the previous 6 months.
The patient's review of systems was unremarkable, with no systemic symptoms of fever, weight loss, or rash.
The patient's medical history revealed a congenital left lower leg deformity and multiple café-au-lait (CAL) spots. A prior head MRI in Korea had been normal, and the family was told that he did not have neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). He has a long-standing history of weekly headache suspicious for migraine. His development and cognition were normal.
Regarding family history, the patient’s father (unavailable for examination) was suspected to have neurofibromas without CAL spots.
On physical examination, the patient’s manual blood pressure was 138/82 mm Hg. His head circumference was 57.5 cm (+1 SD). His mental status was normal. We confirmed multiple CAL spots with more than 10 larger than 1.5 cm. Axillary freckling and cutaneous neurofibromas were noted. He had convex bowing of his left lower extremity. His neurologic examination revealed a normal cranial nerve examination including normal funduscopy. His tone, deep tendon reflexes, strength, and coordination were normal. He had an area of decreased sensation (temperature and pinprick) on the dorsal aspect of his left foot. He had an unremarkable cardiovascular examination exempting hypertension.
Considering the clinical diagnosis of NF-1 (made on examination), our differential diagnosis for the headache and abnormal neuroimaging included NF-1 vasculopathy, transient vascular spasms, or vasculitis. An urgent MRI with vessel imaging was ordered to rule out a stroke. The imaging confirmed multivessel arterial irregular narrowing without vessel wall enhancement (figure, B). Digital subtraction angiography was not deemed necessary. Based on the patient’s neuroimaging, we suspected reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), although NF-1–associated vasculopathy could not be ruled out with certainty. An inflammatory workup, including CSF, complete blood count, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, extractable nuclear antigen, antinuclear antibodies, anti-dsDNA, C3 and C4 complement, von Willebrand factor antigen, liver enzymes, and urine analysis, was negative.
Because of the patient’s hypertension, a kidney ultrasound was ordered to assess his renal vasculature, which identified a 4.3 × 3.0 × 3.8 cm right suprarenal mass suspicious for a pheochromocytoma. This diagnosis was confirmed by excess metanephrine, normetanephrine, norepinephrine, and vanillylmandelic acid in his urine. The mass was further characterized with a PET scan (not FDG-avid) and an MIBG CT scan (MIBG-avid) (figure, E). α-Adrenergic blockade with prazosin was successfully initiated. In the days prior to surgery, additional β-blockade was obtained with propranolol. The patient underwent an uncomplicated laparoscopic right adrenalectomy. The pathology confirmed a pheochromocytoma, with margins negative for tumor involvement. Thereafter, his antihypertensive medication was successfully weaned.
As for management of the suspected RCVS and headaches, calcium channel blocker medication was not initiated initially in order to avoid hypotension with the α-blocker, nor later because the headaches were managed successfully with acetaminophen.
At the patient’s 3-month follow-up, he had no reoccurrence of severe or exercise-induced headache and he had no focal neurologic symptoms. His neuroimaging showed substantial improvement of all previously identified areas of arterial narrowing without vessel wall enhancement or new intracranial abnormality (figure, C and D). This confirmed a diagnosis of RCVS while offering no supportive elements for a component of NF-1–associated vasculopathy due to the reversibility of the vessel narrowing.
Discussion
NF-1 is a neurocutaneous syndrome caused by a germline mutation of the NF1 gene situated on chromosome 17q11.2.1,–,3 Incidence estimate is between 1:2,500 and 1:3,000.1,–,5 This gene acts as a tumor suppressor by being a negative regulator of the RAS proto-oncogene. It encodes the neurofibromin protein affecting cell growth.1,2,4,5 It is an autosomal dominant disease, with 50% of the cases occurring de novo. This syndrome has extreme clinical variability.2,3 The diagnosis is usually made clinically using the NIH criteria, which require the presence of a minimum of 2 of the 7 established criteria.1,2,5 However, NF-1 is a multisystemic syndrome with broader involvement than suggested by its diagnostic criteria. Hypertension is a frequent complication of NF-1. It can be essential or secondary to comorbidities such as vasculopathy, including renal artery stenosis and aortic coarctation, or pheochromocytoma.2,5,6 Cerebral vasculopathy is an underrecognized NF-1 complication and is reported in 2%–15% of individuals with NF-1.6
A pheochromocytoma is a catecholamine-secreting neuroendocrine tumor with a general incidence of 0.002%–0.008%.2,5 However, 30% of pheochromocytomas are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes such as von Hippel–Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2,1 but also with NF-1. Patients with NF-1 have a reported incidence of pheochromocytoma of 0.1%–5.7%, which corresponds to at least a 10-fold higher incidence than in the general population.2,3,5 However, an autopsy series identified pheochromocytoma in up to 13% of patients with NF-1,5 and systematic screening of a small cohort of consecutive patients with NF-1 found a prevalence of pheochromocytoma of 14.6%.3 Pheochromocytoma prevalence in the hypertensive NF-1 population ranges between 20% and 50%3,5 and it presents with adrenergic symptoms. Paroxysmal attacks are described by a classic triad including headaches, tachycardia, and perspiration.3,5,7 These headaches are often described as sudden onset, diffuse, and with severe throbbing, but descriptions similar to typical cluster headaches and migraines are not uncommon.7 Pheochromocytoma may result in serious morbidity and mortality due to sudden catecholamine release during stress, such as during surgery.1,3,5 According to recent research, pheochromocytoma associated with NF-1 has specific characteristics including an absence of familial history, unilateral disease, secretory lesion, and a benign evolution.3,–,5 Age at presentation is usually in the fifth decade, similar to the population without an identified genetic mutation, but older than in other genetic syndromes.2,–,5 Pheochromocytoma has been identified as a precipitant for RCVS7,8 and it may present with various neurologic manifestations such as stroke and hemorrhage, also seen in RCVS.7 Most reported patients with pheochromocytoma did not undergo the appropriate imaging study to explore the possibility of RCVS also being present.7 Thus their true association may be underestimated.
RCVS is a clinico-radiologic diagnosis well recognized in the adult population, but underrecognized in the pediatric population due to its relative rarity.9,10 It has been reported in patients between 7 and 76 years of age with a peak occurrence at 42 years.8,9 RCVS features in adult and pediatric cases are similar, with the exception of a significant male predominance in pediatric cases.9 RCVS is characterized by recurring acute and severe thunderclap headaches, possibly accompanied by other neurologic symptoms.7,8,10 The mechanism is postulated to be a transient disturbance of the cerebrovascular tone resulting in segmental constriction of the cerebral arteries, with the exact pathophysiology still under investigation.8,9 Vasoconstriction of medium and large vessels reaches its apex 2–3 weeks following initial symptoms and is followed by a mandatory resolution within 3 months.7,–,10 Cerebral angiography in the acute phase will show segmental narrowing and dilation of one or more arteries, referred to as a string of beads.8 RCVS can be associated with focal deficits, seizure, TIA, stroke, hemorrhage, and brain edema.7,–,10 RCVS can be a primary condition or secondary to exposure to vasoactive substances or other precipitating factors including pheochromocytoma.7,8,10 In RCVS occurring with pheochromocytoma, it is believed that the vasoconstriction is the result of the high level of circulating catecholamines.7 RCVS is usually reported as a single lifetime episode, especially in pediatric cases.8,–,10 Calcium channel blockers are recognized to reduce the headache symptoms, although they do not modify ischemic and hemorrhagic complications.8,–,10
We present the first reported case in the literature that connects the known relationships between NF-1 with pheochromocytoma and RCVS with pheochromocytoma. This is in addition to the rare pediatric presentation of pheochromocytoma in NF-1.1,4
Current guidelines do not recommend screening for pheochromocytoma in all patients with NF-1.4,5 Our case emphasizes the importance of investigating for this associated condition in hypertensive patients with NF-1.3,5 It contributes to the discussion raised by research groups about systematic screening for pheochromocytoma in all patients with NF-1 starting in late childhood, particularly prior to elective surgery and pregnancy.4,5 Finally, our case stresses the need to consider appropriate neuroimaging and the diagnosis of RCVS in patients with pheochromocytoma with neurologic symptoms and emphasizes the importance of including RCVS in the pediatric differential diagnosis of a thunderclap headache.
Study Funding
No targeted funding reported.
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the neurology, nephrology, endocrinology, and general surgery teams who helped to care for this patient.
Appendix Authors

Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
- © 2020 American Academy of Neurology
References
- 1.↵
- Giovannoni I,
- Callea F,
- Boldrini R,
- Inserra A,
- Cozza R,
- Francalaci P
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- Gruber LM,
- Erickson D,
- Babovis-Vuksanovic D,
- Thompson GB,
- Young WF,
- Bancos I
- 5.↵
- Moramarco J,
- El Ghorayeb N,
- Dumas N, et al
- 6.↵
- Kass B,
- Huisman T,
- AGM Tekes A,
- Bergner A,
- Blakeley JO,
- Jordan LC
- 7.↵
- Anderson NE,
- Chung K,
- Willoughby E,
- Croxson MS
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- Coffina SW,
- Fryer RH
- 10.↵
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Nicole Sur and Dr. Mausaminben Hathidara
► Watch
Related Articles
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Association between benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in NF1T. Tucker, P. Wolkenstein, J. Revuz et al.Neurology, July 25, 2005 -
Article
Primary angiitis of the CNS and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromeA comparative studyHubert de Boysson, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Jérôme Mawet et al.Neurology, September 19, 2018 -
Resident & Fellow Section
Pearls & Oy-sters: A Journey Through Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction SyndromeSex, Drugs, and HeadachesMaksim Son, David Dongkyung Kim, Ruba Kiwan et al.Neurology, November 09, 2020 -
Article
RCVS2 score and diagnostic approach for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromeEva A. Rocha, M. Akif Topcuoglu, Gisele S. Silva et al.Neurology, January 11, 2019