This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Jutten et al.1 in this issue of Neurology® examine the implications of the intrinsic variability in the measurement of cognitive and behavioral functions for designing and interpreting Alzheimer disease (AD) clinical trials. They first identified participant data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative that matched inclusion criteria from 2 trials of aducanumab.2 Using longitudinal cognitive data, they estimated cognitive change from baseline over 18 months using common clinical trial endpoints, the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive (ADAS-cog). With these estimates, they performed thousands of simulations to determine the distribution of treatment-placebo group differences, or average treatment effects that could be expected given that no treatment was administered. In other words, within the context of their inclusion criteria, they sought to define a range of change over time that represented noisy measurement. With the exception of the Phase 3 Study of Aducanumab (BIIB037) in Early Alzheimer's Disease (EMERGE) trial, the average treatment effects of all of the other recent AD trials1 fell within the 95% boundaries of random variation.
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
See page 1023
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
Alzheimer disease brain atrophy subtypes are associated with cognition and rate of decline
Randomized controlled trials in mild cognitive impairment
Finding Treatment Effects in Alzheimer Trials in the Face of Disease Progression Heterogeneity
Determining clinically meaningful decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease