This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective Robust arterial collaterals are associated with successful reperfusion after thrombectomy treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). Excellent venous outflow (VO) reflects excellent tissue perfusion and collateral status in patients with AIS-LVO. The goal of this study was to determine whether favorable VO profiles assessed on pretreatment CT angiography (CTA) images correlate with successful vessel reperfusion after thrombectomy in patients with AIS-LVO.
Methods This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with AIS-LVO treated by thrombectomy. Baseline CTA was used to assess collateral status (Tan scale) and VO using the Cortical Vein Opacification Score (COVES). Favorable VO was defined as COVES ≥3. Primary outcome was excellent vessel reperfusion status (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c/3). Secondary outcome was good functional outcome defined as a score of 0 to 2 on the modified Rankin Scale after 90 days.
Results Five hundred sixty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that favorable VO (odds ratio [OR] 2.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39–3.16]; p < 0.001) was associated with excellent vessel reperfusion during thrombectomy, regardless of good CTA collateral status (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.58–1.34]; p = 0.48). A favorable VO profile (OR 8.9 [95%CI 5.3–14.9]; p < 0.001) and excellent vessel reperfusion status (OR 2.7 [95%CI 1.7–4.4]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with good functional outcome adjusted for age, sex, glucose, tissue plasminogen activator administration, good CTA collateral status, and presentation NIH Stroke Scale score.
Conclusion A favorable VO profile is associated with reperfusion success and good functional outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO treated by endovascular thrombectomy.
Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that a favorable VO profile is associated with reperfusion success and good functional outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO treated by endovascular thrombectomy.
Glossary
- AIS-LVO=
- acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion;
- ASPECTS=
- Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- COVES=
- Cortical Vein Opacification Score;
- CTA=
- CT angiography;
- mRS=
- modified Rankin Scale;
- NCCT=
- noncontrast CT;
- NIHSS=
- NIH Stroke Scale;
- OR=
- odds ratio;
- TICI=
- Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction;
- tPA=
- tissue plasminogen activator;
- VO=
- venous outflow
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 1109
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received September 15, 2020.
- Accepted in final form March 17, 2021.
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.