Association of Venous Outflow Profiles and Successful Vessel Reperfusion After Thrombectomy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective Robust arterial collaterals are associated with successful reperfusion after thrombectomy treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). Excellent venous outflow (VO) reflects excellent tissue perfusion and collateral status in patients with AIS-LVO. The goal of this study was to determine whether favorable VO profiles assessed on pretreatment CT angiography (CTA) images correlate with successful vessel reperfusion after thrombectomy in patients with AIS-LVO.
Methods This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with AIS-LVO treated by thrombectomy. Baseline CTA was used to assess collateral status (Tan scale) and VO using the Cortical Vein Opacification Score (COVES). Favorable VO was defined as COVES ≥3. Primary outcome was excellent vessel reperfusion status (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c/3). Secondary outcome was good functional outcome defined as a score of 0 to 2 on the modified Rankin Scale after 90 days.
Results Five hundred sixty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that favorable VO (odds ratio [OR] 2.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39–3.16]; p < 0.001) was associated with excellent vessel reperfusion during thrombectomy, regardless of good CTA collateral status (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.58–1.34]; p = 0.48). A favorable VO profile (OR 8.9 [95%CI 5.3–14.9]; p < 0.001) and excellent vessel reperfusion status (OR 2.7 [95%CI 1.7–4.4]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with good functional outcome adjusted for age, sex, glucose, tissue plasminogen activator administration, good CTA collateral status, and presentation NIH Stroke Scale score.
Conclusion A favorable VO profile is associated with reperfusion success and good functional outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO treated by endovascular thrombectomy.
Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that a favorable VO profile is associated with reperfusion success and good functional outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO treated by endovascular thrombectomy.
Glossary
- AIS-LVO=
- acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion;
- ASPECTS=
- Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- COVES=
- Cortical Vein Opacification Score;
- CTA=
- CT angiography;
- mRS=
- modified Rankin Scale;
- NCCT=
- noncontrast CT;
- NIHSS=
- NIH Stroke Scale;
- OR=
- odds ratio;
- TICI=
- Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction;
- tPA=
- tissue plasminogen activator;
- VO=
- venous outflow
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 1109
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received September 15, 2020.
- Accepted in final form March 17, 2021.
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.