The Critical Role of the Neurology Diversity Officer in Serving Our Patients, Profession, and the Neurology Pipeline
The Time Is Now
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
We write this editorial after experiencing a 10-month global pandemic that has disproportionately affected marginalized racial and ethnic communities. We write this editorial with heightened focus on the historical impact that structurally racist policies have had on justice, housing, education, and (most applicably to this readership) health care systems. We write this editorial after this last year also revealed some hard truth(s) regarding the direct and historic connections between the institution of slavery and current medical research,1 medical education,2 and the traditions and practices of some of our most respected academic medical centers.3 This contextual lens placed even greater relevance to the article by Mohile et al.,4 “Developing the Neurology Diversity Officer: A Roadmap for Academic Neurology Departments,” in this issue of Neurology®. The authors present various roles and unique challenges that the neurology diversity officer or equity, diversity, inclusion (EDI) equivalent officers (NDOE) and the academic community must consider to create inclusive academic neurology communities. Arguably, the events and experiences over the last year provide the most substantial evidence for the requisite role of the NDOE in our effort to fulfill the oath to serve the following stakeholders: (1) our patients (who are becoming increasingly diverse as noted in the article),4 (2) ourselves and our pipeline (who are not only expecting but increasingly demanding a greater focus on EDI in the interprofessional healthcare environment),5 and (3) our research (which increasingly requires the inclusion of a diverse participant enrollment in all clinical and therapeutic research protocols).6,7 Dating back to 1957, Merton spoke of the critical role of the medical education experience in cultivating the professional identity of a physician.8 More recently, the Carnegie Foundation developed this concept further by citing professional identity formation as 1 of the 4 primary concepts to target in medical curricular reform.9 Professional identity formation is defined as the process by which the learner is shepherded through his or her transformation into a “physician with the values, disposition, and aspirations of the physician community.”8 A strong professional identity has been linked to training physicians who deliver higher-quality care.10 Progress toward fulfilling the oath to serve our 3 aforementioned stakeholders makes it increasingly apparent that the presence of NDOE is paramount to both the transformation and maintenance of the neurologist's professional identity.9
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the editorial.
See page 386
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.