Abstract
Background and Objective There are few studies comparing lesion evolution across different CNS demyelinating diseases, yet knowledge of this may be important for diagnosis and understanding differences in disease pathogenesis. We sought to compare MRI T2 lesion evolution in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin G (IgG)–associated disorder (MOGAD), aquaporin 4 IgG–positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG-NMOSD), and multiple sclerosis (MS).
Methods In this descriptive study, we retrospectively identified Mayo Clinic patients with MOGAD, AQP4-IgG-NMOSD, or MS and (1) brain or myelitis attack; (2) available attack MRI within 6 weeks; and (3) follow-up MRI beyond 6 months without interval relapses in that region. Two neurologists identified the symptomatic or largest T2 lesion for each patient (index lesion). MRIs were then independently reviewed by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to diagnosis to determine resolution of T2 lesions by consensus. The index T2 lesion area was manually outlined acutely and at follow-up to assess variation in size.
Results We included 156 patients (MOGAD, 38; AQP4-IgG-NMOSD, 51; MS, 67) with 172 attacks (brain, 81; myelitis, 91). The age (median [range]) differed between MOGAD (25 [2–74]), AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (53 [10–78]), and MS (37 [16–61]) (p < 0.01) and female sex predominated in the AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (41/51 [80%]) and MS (51/67 [76%]) groups but not among those with MOGAD (17/38 [45%]). Complete resolution of the index T2 lesion was more frequent in MOGAD (brain, 13/18 [72%]; spine, 22/28 [79%]) than AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (brain, 3/21 [14%]; spine, 0/34 [0%]) and MS (brain, 7/42 [17%]; spine, 0/29 [0%]) (p < 0.001). Resolution of all T2 lesions occurred most often in MOGAD (brain, 7/18 [39%]; spine, 22/28 [79%]) than AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (brain, 2/21 [10%]; spine, 0/34 [0%]) and MS (brain, 2/42 [5%]; spine, 0/29 [0%]) (p < 0.01). There was a larger median (range) reduction in T2 lesion area in mm2 on follow-up axial brain MRI with MOGAD (213 [55–873]) than AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (104 [0.7–597]) (p = 0.02) and MS (36 [0–506]) (p < 0.001) and the reductions in size on sagittal spine MRI follow-up in MOGAD (262 [0–888]) and AQP4-IgG-NMOSD (309 [0–1885]) were similar (p = 0.4) and greater than in MS (23 [0–152]) (p < 0.001).
Discussion The MRI T2 lesions in MOGAD resolve completely more often than in AQP4-IgG-NMOSD and MS. This has implications for diagnosis, monitoring disease activity, and clinical trial design, while also providing insight into pathogenesis of CNS demyelinating diseases.
Glossary
- AQP4=
- aquaporin 4;
- AQP4-IgG-NMOSD=
- aquaporin 4–immunoglobulin G–positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder;
- EDSS=
- Expanded Disability Status Scale;
- FLAIR=
- fluid-attenuated inversion recovery;
- IgG=
- immunoglobulin G;
- IVIg=
- IV immunoglobulin;
- MOG=
- myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein;
- MOGAD=
- myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–immunoglobulin G–associated disorder;
- MS=
- multiple sclerosis;
- PLEX=
- plasma exchange
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
The Article Processing Charge will be funded by NIH.
Podcast: NPub.org/1g0etl
- Received December 30, 2020.
- Accepted in final form June 11, 2021.
- Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Reader Response: Comparison of MRI Lesion Evolution in Different Central Nervous System Demyelinating Disorders
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
