Teaching NeuroImage: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Related Fasciitis and Myositis With Perifascicular Atrophy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Case Summary
A 58-year-old man with melanoma treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab presented with pain, limited joint mobility, and proximal weakness without oculobulbar weakness, dyspnea, or rash. EMG demonstrated positive sharp waves, fibrillations, and myopathic units. Extremity MRI showed diffuse fascial and mild muscle enhancement consistent with fasciitis/mild myositis (Figure). Creatinine kinase was normal. PET-CT demonstrated diffusely fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lymph nodes and muscles; lymph node biopsy revealed granulomatous inflammation suggesting immune checkpoint inhibitor-related inflammatory reaction. Biceps biopsy demonstrated perifascicular atrophy (PA) and fascial/perimysial perivascular inflammation (Figure).
Perifascicular atrophy noted on H&E (A), ATPase (B), and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (C) stains (arrow) with fascial, perimysial, and perivascular inflammatory infiltrates on H&E (A, arrowhead) and acid phosphatase (D, E, arrowheads). Precontrast and postcontrast MRI of the lower extremities (F.a, F.b) and upper extremities (F.c, F.d) with fascial and muscle enhancement.
Histopathologic findings of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myositis initially included necrosis, macrophagy, and endomysial inflammation. The spectrum has expanded to include perimysial perivascular inflammation and PA tendency.1,2
Study Funding
The authors report no targeted funding.
Disclosure
T.R. Fullam reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript; N. McGraw reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript; M. Grainger reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript; S. Chandrashekhar reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript; M.M. Dimachkie reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript with full disclosures up to date on the AAN website. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Appendix Authors

Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Teaching slides links.lww.com/WNL/B481
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
References
- 1.↵
- Matas-García A,
- Milisenda JC,
- Selva-O'Callaghan A, et al.
- 2.↵
- Touat M,
- Maisonobe T,
- Knauss S, et al
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.