This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Spinal cord sarcoidosis is a rare manifestation of sarcoidosis with a consequent risk of neurologic sequelae for the patient. We investigated prognostic factors and efficacy of immunosuppressive treatments in a longitudinal cohort.
Methods We retrospectively studied patients with spinal cord sarcoidosis followed between 1995 and 2021 in 7 centers in France. Patients with definite, probable, or possible spinal cord sarcoidosis according to the Neurosarcoidosis Consortium Consensus Group criteria and with spinal cord involvement confirmed by MRI were included. We analyzed relapse or progression rate with a Poisson model, initial Rankin score with a linear model, and change in the Rankin score during follow-up with a logistic model.
Results A total of 97 patients were followed for a median of 7.8 years. Overall mean relapse or progression rate was 0.17 per person-year and decreased over time. At last visit, 46 (47.4%) patients had a loss of autonomy (Rankin score ≥2). The main prognostic factors significantly associated with relapse or progression rate were gadolinium enhancement (relative rate [95% CI] 0.61 [0.4, 0.95]) or meningeal involvement (relative rate [95% CI] 2.05 [1.31, 3.19]) on spinal cord MRI and cell count (relative rate [95% CI] per 1 log increase 1.16 [1.01, 1.33]) on CSF analysis. Relapse or progression rate was not significantly associated with initial Rankin score or Expanded Disability Status Scale. Tumor necrosis factor–α (TNF-α) antagonists significantly decreased relapse or progression rate compared with corticosteroids alone (relative rate [95% CI] 0.33 [0.11, 0.98]). Azathioprine was significantly less effective than methotrexate on relapse or progression rate (relative rate [95% CI] 2.83 [1.04, 7.75]) and change in Rankin score (mean difference [95% CI] 0.65 [0.23, 1.08]).
Discussion Regarding the relapse or progression rate, meningeal localization of sarcoidosis was associated with a worse prognosis, TNF-α antagonists resulted in a significant decrease compared to corticosteroids alone, and methotrexate was more effective than azathioprine.
Classification of Evidence This study provides Class IV evidence that in individuals with spinal cord neurosarcoidosis, TNF-α antagonists were associated with decreased relapse or progression rate compared to corticosteroids alone, but other therapies showed no significant benefit.
Glossary
- ACE=
- angiotensin-converting enzyme;
- EDSS=
- Expanded Disability Status Scale;
- IgG=
- immunoglobulin G;
- MMF=
- mycophenolate mofetil;
- mRS=
- modified Rankin Scale;
- NCCG=
- Neurosarcoidosis Consortium Consensus Group;
- NMOSD=
- neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder;
- OR=
- odds ratio;
- TNF=
- tumor necrosis factor
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received July 15, 2021.
- Accepted in final form January 3, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
