Spectrum of Phenotypic, Genetic, and Functional Characteristics in Patients With Epilepsy With KCNC2 Pathogenic Variants
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Background and Objectives KCNC2 encodes Kv3.2, a member of the Shaw-related (Kv3) voltage-gated potassium channel subfamily, which is important for sustained high-frequency firing and optimized energy efficiency of action potentials in the brain. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical phenotype, genetic background, and biophysical function of disease-associated Kv3.2 variants.
Methods Individuals with KCNC2 variants detected by exome sequencing were selected for clinical, further genetic, and functional analysis. Cases were referred through clinical and research collaborations. Selected de novo variants were examined electrophysiologically in Xenopus laevis oocytes.
Results We identified novel KCNC2 variants in 18 patients with various forms of epilepsy, including genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE), developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) including early-onset absence epilepsy, focal epilepsy, and myoclonic-atonic epilepsy. Of the 18 variants, 10 were de novo and 8 were classified as modifying variants. Eight drug-responsive patients became seizure-free using valproic acid as monotherapy or in combination, including severe DEE cases. Functional analysis of 4 variants demonstrated gain of function in 3 severely affected DEE cases and loss of function in 1 case with a milder phenotype (GGE) as the underlying pathomechanisms.
Discussion These findings implicate KCNC2 as a novel causative gene for epilepsy and emphasize the critical role of KV3.2 in the regulation of brain excitability.
Glossary
- CSWS=
- continuous spikes and waves during sleep;
- DEE=
- developmental and epileptic encephalopathies;
- EOAE=
- early-onset absence epilepsy;
- FE=
- focal epilepsy;
- GGE=
- genetic generalized epilepsy;
- JME=
- juvenile myoclonic epilepsy;
- MAE=
- myoclonic-atonic epilepsy;
- MTR=
- missense tolerance ratio;
- VPA=
- valproic acid;
- WT=
- wild-type
Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent neurologic diseases, with ≈50 million people affected worldwide.1 Particularly in children and young adults, epilepsy represents a substantial disease burden relative to other neurologic conditions.2 The identification of epilepsy-associated genes in the past decade has dramatically improved the understanding of epileptogenesis. More than 10 epilepsy-associated genes coding for potassium channels have been identified. Based on this knowledge, new precision medicine approaches like the treatment with the potassium channel blocker 4-aminopyridine in KCNA2-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE)3 were developed. Based on the original description, potassium channels are divided into Shaker, Shal, Shab, and Shaw subtypes.4 The Shaw-related potassium channel family (KV3) plays a pivotal role in the excitability of the CNS by regulating action potential duration and firing pattern of neurons as well as neurotransmitter release.5,6 So far, only KCNC1 and KCNC3 as members of this potassium channel gene family have been implicated in human neurologic diseases (progressive myoclonus epilepsy and spinocerebellar ataxia).7,8 KCNC2 codes for the potassium channel KV3.2 (an additional member of the KV3 sub family) mainly expressed in the brain in the interneurons of cortex, thalamus, hippocampus, and basal ganglia.5
We identified 16 different heterozygous variants in KCNC2 in 18 unrelated individuals with DEE including early-onset absence epilepsy (EOAE) and other, more mild epilepsy syndromes such as genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE), epilepsy with focal epilepsy (FE), and myoclonic-atonic epilepsy (MAE), and provide a detailed phenotypical, genetic, and functional analysis emphasizing the role of KCNC2 as a novel disease gene in human epilepsies.
Methods
Patients
Participating patients and relatives were identified through clinical and research collaborations in our study, including individuals contributing through the Epi25 consortium.9 Recruitment was performed by the local centers. The data collection included age at onset, sex, seizure types, epilepsy syndrome, result of neurologic examination, cognitive state and development, EEG, brain MRI results, treatment, and outcome. The epilepsy syndromes were classified using the actual International League Against Epilepsy criteria10 by trained neurologists, epileptologists, and neuropediatricians. The clinical, neuroimaging, and electrophysiologic data were reviewed in detail by 2 experienced clinicians. The epilepsy syndromes were only subclassified (e.g., juvenile myoclonic epilepsy [JME]) as a subtype of GGE if the clinical aspects met the above mentioned criteria; if not, the term GGE was chosen. Individuals with KCNC2 variants were selected and variants were identified by whole exome sequencing in single or trio setting. Segregation analysis was performed when possible. No other relevant variants were detected in these cases based on the classification criteria by the American College of Medical Genetics.11
Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study or by their legal representatives. The study was approved by each of the following local ethics committees: Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Frankfurt, and Kiel, Germany; Epilepsy Centre Heemstede, the Netherlands; Epilepsiezentrum Bodensee, Weissenau, Germany; Danish Epilepsy Centre, Dianalund, Denmark; IRCCS Istituti delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italy; Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin; University of Florence, Italy; The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia; Duke University, Durham, NC; University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Tel-Aviv University, Israel; University of Genova, Italy; Philipps-University Marburg, Germany; and Cleveland Clinic, OH.
Methods
Sanger Sequencing Analysis
We performed bidirectional Sanger sequencing of the respective areas of KCNC2 (NM_139137) using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit on an ABI3730XL DNA Analyzer to confirm the described mutations and define the inheritance model (Applied Biosystems; primer sequences available upon request).
The presented KCNC2 variants were grouped into 2 different categories. The first category (group 1, pathogenic) includes patients with de novo variants. We also acquired variants absent in large population databases (except D128E, once described in gnomAD) that were either inherited from an unaffected parent or variants where a positive family history could be determined without knowledge available about the inheritance model. We defined these as likely pathogenic or modifying variants (group 2) if a minimum of 3/4 prediction scores indicate them as potentially damaging and the CADD score was high (>20) (eTable 1, links.lww.com/WNL/B901).
Protein Structure Analysis
No experimentally solved protein structure was available for the human KV3.2 channel. We generated a model of the protein structure using the RaptorX webserver12 that covered all 638 residues of the protein (NM_139137; NP_631875). Two scores were used for the identification of variant sensitive amino acid residues. First, we used our recently developed and validated score that identifies paralog conserved regions across genes of the same gene family (Para_zscore).13 In a follow-up study, we showed that paralogous conserved regions are enriched for patient variants,14 in particular in neurodevelopmental diseases.13 Second, we used the missense tolerance ratio (MTR) score, which quantifies the constraint of each residue to missense variants in the general population. It was demonstrated that the most constrained regions are enriched for pathogenic variants in ClinVar and HGMD.15 Variants and critical regions were visualized in PyMOL.16
Functional Investigations
Four variants were selected for functional analysis according to the associated phenotype, the location, and the predicted effect on the structure of the protein.
Backbone and RNA Preparation
Vector pcDNA3.1 (+) + insert KCNC2 wild-type (WT) and the mutant clones (NM_139137: c.375C > G/p.Cys125Trp/C125W; c.404A > G/p.Glu135Gly/E135G; c.656T > C/p.Phe219Ser/F219S; c.1309A > G/p.Thr437Ala/T437A) were acquired from GenScript USA Inc. WT and mutant cDNA sequences were fully resequenced before being used in experiments to confirm the variant and exclude the presence of any additional sequence alterations. cRNA was prepared using the SP6 mMessage kit from Ambion according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Electrophysiology
Collagenase-treated Xenopus laevis oocytes were acquired from Ecocyte Bioscience (1 mg/mL type CLS II collagenase [Biochrom] in OR-2 solution [in mM] 82.5 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, and 5 HEPES, pH 7.5), washed 3 times, and stored at 16°C in Barth solution ([in mM] 88 NaCl, 2.4 NaHCO3, 1 KCl, 0.33 Ca[NO3]2, 0.41 CaCl2, 0.82 MgSO4, and 5 Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 with NaOH) supplemented with 50 µg/mL gentamicin (Biochrom). To compare current amplitudes of WT and mutant channels, 70 nL of cRNA encoding WT or mutant KCNC2 cRNA (c = 1 µg/µL) were injected on the same day using the same batch of oocytes. For recordings of homozygous conditions of the WT or mutant KV3.2 channels, 70 nL of cRNA (1.0) were injected. To be able to record the heterozygous condition, 35 nL of the WT and 35 nL of the related mutant KCNC2 cRNA were injected. Injection was performed with the automated Roboinject system (Multi Channel Systems) and oocytes were incubated for 5 days (at 17°C) before the experiments were performed. Potassium currents in oocytes were recorded at room temperature (20–22°C) using Roboocyte2 (Multi Channel Systems). For 2-electrode voltage-clamp (TEVC) recordings, oocytes were impaled with 2 glass electrodes (resistance of 0.4–1 MΩ) containing a solution of 1 M KCl and 1.5 M potassium acetate and clamped at a holding potential of −80 mV. Oocytes were perfused with an ND96 bath solution containing (in mM) 93.5 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, and 5 HEPES (pH 7.6). Currents were sampled at 2 kHz.
Western Blot Analysis
For protein blotting, injected Xenopus laevis oocytes were lysed in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris HCl (pH7.6), 100 M NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and 1X complete protease inhibitors (Roche). After measuring the protein concentrations (BCA Systems [Thermo Fisher Scientific]), 50 µg of protein were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Pall Corporation) and protein blotting was performed using a monoclonal mouse antibody (S410-17) against KV3.2 (KCNC2) (MA5-27683 [Thermo Fisher]) with a concentration of 1:500. Water-injected oocytes were used as negative control.
Data and Statistical Analysis
Data analysis and graphical illustrations were achieved using Roboocyte2+ (Multi Channel Systems), Excel (Microsoft), and GraphPad Prism Software. Normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test and statistical evaluation for multiple comparisons was conducted using 1-way analysis of variance on ranks with Dunn post hoc test. Statistical testing was performed with SigmaPlot 12.0 (Systat Software, Inc.) and differences between groups were considered significant with p < 0.05. Data are reported as mean ± SEM.
Data Availability
Anonymized data not published within this article will be made available by request from any qualified investigator.
Results
Patients
We identified 18 patients carrying 16 different KCNC2 variants (Table 1), 10 male and 8 female, and separated the patients into 2 categories regarding the potential pathogenicity of their respective KCNC2 variants. Within these groups, we could describe the following phenotypes.
Clinical and Genetic Information on the Analyzed Cohort
Pathogenic Variants (de novo, Group 1): 10/18 Patients
Myoclonic-Atonic Epilepsy
One of the 10 patients presented with myoclonic, atonic, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (exact onset not applicable but before 4 years of age), which were drug-resistant. EEG recordings showed polyspike-wave discharges. The neurologic examination and the mental presentation were normal. On brain MRI, the patient had a developmental venous anomaly, which is a nonspecific finding for epilepsy.
Genetic Generalized Epilepsy
One of the 10 patients presented a drug-resistant subtype of GGE featuring generalized tonic-clonic seizures with onset at 18 years of age. EEG recordings showed typical generalized epileptic discharges with polyspike-waves. The neurologic examination and the brain MRI results were normal.
Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy
Six of the 10 patients with a DEE could be identified carrying a de novo KCNC2 variant. The age at onset ranged from the first month of life to 1 year. Moderate to severe intellectual disability was present in all patients. Further neuropsychiatric findings were present in 3/6 patients: 1 patient demonstrated an ataxic gait, hypotonia, speech disturbance, and macrocephaly; a second patient had autism spectrum disorder, impaired sleep, hyperactivity, and aphasia; and the third patient presented with isolated hyperactivity. Depending on the syndrome, EEG showed continuous spikes and waves during sleep (CSWS) (2 patients), hypsarrhythmia and later multifocal spikes (1 case), or bilateral/generalized discharges (3 cases). The brain MRI was normal in 5 patients; 1 patient showed an arachnoid cyst combined with brain atrophy. Only 1 patient achieved seizure freedom, using valproic acid (VPA).
Early-Onset Absence Epilepsy
Two of the 10 patients had EOAE, with an onset between 1.5 and 8 months. The EOAE syndrome also can be defined as a subtype of DEE but we preferred to describe these patients separately. Both had normal MRI and generalized epileptiform discharges on EEG. They had mild intellectual disability and demonstrated additional abnormalities including facial dysmorphism (more detailed information was not available), hypotonia, ataxia, and autism spectrum disorder. One of the patients showed a regression in language development. The other patient achieved seizure freedom using a combination of VPA and clobazam.
Likely Pathogenic Variants (Group 2)—8/18 Patients
Genetic Generalized Epilepsy
Five of the 8 patients presented with subtypes of GGE featuring absences, myoclonic, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (onset age 3–14 years). EEG recordings showed 3–4 Hz spike-wave complexes, polyspike waves, or normal interictal results. The neurologic examination was normal in all patients. One patient with GGE had psychiatric symptoms with depression and anxiety, while another showed mild intellectual disability. GGE subclassification was possible in 4/5 patients with GGE of this subgroup of variants—3 with juvenile absence epilepsy and 1 with JME. On the available brain MRI, 1 patient had generalized brain atrophy, which is a nonspecific finding for epilepsy. Four of the 5 patients with GGE were seizure-free (1 lasting >2 years) using VPA in monotherapy or in combination.
Focal Epilepsies
Two of the 8 patients had FE. Neurologic examination and brain MRI were normal in 1 patient and not available in the other. Neither had intellectual disability. EEG demonstrated bilateral temporal and generalized discharges. One patient achieved seizure freedom using VPA.
Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy
One of the 8 patients had DEE. The age at onset was 2 years. This patient had mild intellectual disability but no other neuropsychiatric findings. The EEG showed generalized discharges and the brain MRI was normal. The patient received seizure freedom using VPA.
Genetic Findings
We present 16 unique heterozygous missense variants identified in 18 patients including a first initial case published already by our group.17 Fifteen of the 16 variants were not found in control cohorts previously. The remaining variant was found once in the control cohort gnomAD (D128E). The presented KCNC2 variants were grouped into 2 different categories (see also Table 1 and Methods). Pathogenic variants (group 1) were found in 10/18 cases. Modifying variants (group 2) were detected in 8/18 cases, either inherited from an unaffected parent (n = 4) or variants where a positive family history could be determined without knowledge available about the inheritance model (n = 4).
Interestingly, 2 variants were identified in our cohort with a similar clinical picture with regard to seizure onset, seizure types, and developmental delay. Both patients (2 cases) with the variant R351K presented with a CSWS phenotype and all 3 patients carrying the T437N/A variant had severe DEE with onset between 3 and 11 months of age, dominant absences and myoclonic seizures, moderate to profound intellectual impairment, and multiple drug-resistant epilepsy.
Protein Structure Analysis
Based on knowledge of potassium channel structure, we located the KCNC2 variants across the 6 transmembrane segments of the KV3.2 subunit as well as in the long cytoplasmic N- and C-terminal regions18 (Figure 1A). The fourth transmembrane domain of the KV3.2 subunit builds a voltage sensor and the extracellular loop between the fifth and the sixth transmembrane domain serves as a selectivity filter for potassium ions. The identified variants were located in the N- and C-terminal portion of the protein as well as in the last 4 transmembrane domains, but the localization of each variant did not correlate with a specific phenotype. Because there was no crystal structure available, we modeled the structure of the KV3.2 subunit and mapped the identified variants onto our model (Figure 1B). By combining the evidence of both scores used, we detected critical regions (>5 consecutively amino acids) characterized by paralog conservation (Para_zscore > 0) and depletion of population variants (MTR < 0.459). A total of 9 of 18 patient variants (F219S, V330M, S333T, R351K [2 patients], F382C, T437A/N [3 patients]) are located within these special regions. These regions/variants were all located close to or within the transmembrane region of the protein. Interestingly, one further variant (I465V) was located in the transmembrane region. All others were localized in the cytoplasmic regions. Three variants were de novo cytosolic N-terminal variants (C125W, E135G, D167Y) within or close to the structured N-terminal cytoplasmic region, the so-called T1 domain, which is important for the tetramerization of the protein.19 The C-terminal region that harbored 2 patient variants is predicted to be mainly unstructured.
A) Schematic structure of the KV3.2 subunit. The subunit consists of 6 transmembrane segments (1–6) with long C- and N-terminal regions. The N-terminal plays a crucial role for the tetramerization of the channel. The 4th transmembrane segment works as the voltage sensor and the extracellular loop between the 5th and the 6th transmembrane segment forms the selectivity filter for K+ ions. Variants are color-coded according to the phenotype of the patient: red = developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, yellow = early-onset absence epilepsy, blue = genetic generalized epilepsy, green = myoclonic-atonic epilepsy, and brown = focal epilepsy. (B) The 3D structure of KV3.2 predicted by RaptorX with KCNC2 variants and phenotypes included. The golden areas within the structure are highly conserved regions characterized by paralog conservation (Paraz score) and depletion of population variants (missense tolerance ratio [MTR] score). Extracellular loops are shown above the dotted line; the intracellular N- and C-terminal regions are shown below the line. The splice variant and E608K are not shown within the structure. E608K is only expressed in transcript number NM_139136 and not on NM_139137. which was used to create the structure. Red-rimmed variants were selected for functional analysis either measured here or previously described by us.17
We could not detect a strong phenotype–localization correlation in the predicted structure of the KV3.2 subunit, but most of the identified variants are located in specific relevant and conserved areas of the channel.
Functional Analysis
We analyzed 4 different variants, which were selected according to the location of the variant within the channel structure as well as the phenotype of the patient (C125W-EOAE, E135G-DEE, F219S-GGE, and T437A-EOAE; see also Figure 1). All of them showed a de novo inheritance pattern and none of them was found in control cohorts (gnomAD). C125W and E135G are located within the T1 domain, which is important for the tetramerization of the channel (see eFigure 1, links.lww.com/WNL/B901). The Zn2+ coordinating motif is also located in this region (Hx5Cx20CC), which is important in bridging the interaction interface between 2 proteins and stabilizing the tetrameric protein structure. The Zn2+ location within the Shaw and Shaker family is different, suggesting that zinc may play a role in differentiating Shaw from Shaker T1 in assembly.19 F219S is located shortly before the first transmembrane domain and T437A is located within the P-domain (TxxT/SxGY/FG), which acts as the K+ selectivity filter, and affects the second important amino acid of the P-domain motif.18
The functionally analyzed variant F219S-GGE showed a complete loss of function in the homozygous and heterozygous state with current amplitudes comparable to the ones obtained from water-injected control oocytes (Figure 2A). Thus, this variant causes a dominant negative effect on WT channels (Figure 2, A and C). T437A-EOAE led to a significant reduction of the current amplitude, while C125W-EOAE showed a significant increase in the current amplitude. The analysis of E135G-DEE could not demonstrate any differences compared with oocytes injected with the WT subunit (Figure 3, A and B). To make sure that all variants have been expressed in the injected oocytes, we performed a Western blot analysis. This analysis showed a band at about 90 kDa in all protein lysates except for the water-injected control oocytes. As loading control, the housekeeping gene β-actin was used, and all protein lysates showed a band at about 40 kDa. Thus, all variants showed expression in oocytes (Figures 2B and 3D). The analysis of the channel kinetics of the variants C125W-EOAE, E135G-DEE, and T437A-EOAE showed a significant shift of the activation curve to more hyperpolarized potentials (Figure 3E) and in total a slower deactivation compared with oocytes expressing WT channels (Figure 3F). E135G-DEE showed a significantly slower deactivation time constant compared with cells injected with RNA encoding only WT subunits at all recorded voltages except for 0 mV. For C125W-EOAE and T437A-EOAE, the deactivation time constant was significantly reduced between −50 mV and −20 mV or −30 mV, respectively, in comparison with oocytes expressing WT channels (Figure 3F). Thus, analysis of the variants C125W, E135G, and T437A in total demonstrates a gain of function in the channel kinetics. The membrane potential of the variants C125W, F219S, and T437A was significantly shifted to more hyperpolarized potentials (Figures 2D and 3C).
Functional analysis for the F219S variant compared with wild-type (WT). The figures show that the milder phenotype F219S-GGE has a dramatically dominant negative effect in a sense of a loss of function. (A) Representative traces of KV3.2 currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing WT, F219S, or a 1:1 mixture of both in response to the voltage steps from −70 mV to +30 mV. (B) Immunoblot analysis for lysates of X laevis oocytes injected with cRNA for KV3.2 WT, F219S, equal amounts of WT + F219S, or water. All channels showed a band at about 90 kDa. (C) Mean current amplitudes of analyzed oocytes injected with WT (n = 101), F219S (n = 39), equal amounts of WT + F219S (n = 29), or water (n = 44). (D) Resting membrane potentials of oocytes injected with WT (n = 101), F219S (n = 39), equal amounts of WT + F219S (n = 29), or water (n = 44). Shown are means ± SEM. Statistically significant differences between WT channels and the tested groups were verified by analysis of variance on ranks (indicated by asterisks).
Functional analysis of the variants C125W, E135G, and T437A compared with wild-type (WT). The more severe phenotypes C125W-EOAE (increased current amplitude/activation at more hyperpolarized potentials/slow deactivation), E135G-DEE (normal current/activation at more hyperpolarized potentials/slow deactivation), and T437A-EOAE (reduced current amplitude/activation at more hyperpolarized potentials/slow deactivation) demonstrate gain of function. (A) Representative traces of KV3.2 currents recorded in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing wild-type (WT) or the different variants (C125W, E135G, T437A) in response to voltage steps from −70 mV to +30 mV (with an increment of 10 mV). (B) Mean current amplitudes of oocytes injected with WT (n = 101) and equal amounts of WT + C125W (n = 40), WT + E135G (n = 31), WT + T437A (n = 41), or water (1.0, n = 44). (C) Resting membrane potentials of oocytes injected with WT (n = 101) and equal amounts of WT + C125W (n = 40), WT + E135G (n = 31), WT + F219S (n = 29), WT + T437A (n = 41), or water (n = 44). Shown are means ± SEM. Statistically significant differences between WT channels and the tested groups were verified by analysis of variance on ranks (indicated by asterisks). (D) Immunoblot analysis for lysates of X laevis oocytes injected with cRNA for KV3.2 WT and equal amounts of WT + C125W, WT + E135G, WT + T437A, or water. All channels showed a band at about 90 kDa. E. Mean voltage-dependent activation of KV3.2 channel for WT (n = 101), equal amounts of WT + C125W (n = 40), WT + E135G (n = 31), and WT + T437A (n = 42). Lines illustrate Boltzmann function fit to the data points. All activation curves showed a significant shift to more hyperpolarized potentials in comparison with WT channel alone. All data are shown as means ± SEM. (F) Mean voltage-dependent deactivation time constant of KV3.2 channel WT (n = 72), WT + C125W (n = 40), WT + E135G (n = 12), and WT + T437A (n = 20). All deactivation curves showed a significantly slower deactivation in comparison with channels only containing WT subunit. All data are shown as means ± SEM.
Taken together, the variant T437A-EOAE showed a mixed effect on the channel function, with a gain of function based on changes in the channel kinetics and a loss of function based on a decrease in the normalized current amplitude. For the other 2 variants (C125W-EOAE and E135G-DEE), the gain of function was the predominant effect.
Overall, we could detect 18 patients carrying a KCNC2 variant, of which 10/18 were defined as pathogenic and 8/18 as modifying, with a variable phenotype including GGE (6/18 cases in total: 1 with pathogenic variants, 5 modifying), DEE (7/18 cases in total: 6 with pathogenic variants, 1 modifying), EOAE (2/18 cases in total: 2 pathogenic), FE (2/18 cases in total: 2 modifying), and MAE (1/18: pathogenic). The 10 pathogenic variants are mainly located in the T1 domain (responsible for tetramer formation), voltage sensor, and P domain (K+ selectivity filter; see also eFigure 1, links.lww.com/WNL/B901). Three of the 8 modifying variants are located in the T1 domain; others, in nonspecific areas. The functional analysis demonstrated in the more severe phenotypes a clear gain-of-function effect (DEE and EOAE), whereas the milder phenotype F219S-GGE causes a dramatic dominant negative loss-of-function effect.
Discussion
We describe pathogenic variants in KCNC2 as a novel genetic etiology for human epilepsies. Phenotypes range from mild generalized epilepsies to severe DEEs related to specific functional changes.
The variants collected ranged from pathogenic to modifying. Therefore, we divided these into 2 different categories. The first category includes only de novo variants that are pathogenic (10/18 variants). The second category includes patients with variants in KCNC2 that are likely to be disease-causing or to have only a modifying effect because the prediction scores indicated pathogenicity but the variants were inherited by unaffected family members or the inheritance mode was unclear (8/18). The clinical spectrum observed in KCNC2-related disorders is very broad concerning the extent of severity. DEE was the main phenotype (39% in total cohort, including EOAE: 50%), but closely followed by GGE (34% in total cohort), FE (11% in total cohort), and 1 case with MAE (5% in total cohort). Nevertheless, the recurrent variants had a recognizable homogenous clinical picture with a CSWS syndrome (R351K) and similar onset, seizure types, mental status, and drug resistance (T437N/A), hinting at potential unique variant-specific genotype–phenotype correlation.
In general, the KCNC2 cohort showed a reduced drug response, as only 8/18 patients were seizure-free (4/8 patients with GGE). In addition, the GGE-KCNC2 drug-responsive patients seem to have a poor prognosis as only 66% were drug-responsive compared with approximately 90% in the general GGE population.20 Nevertheless, it is interesting that all drug-responsive patients became seizure-free using VPA as monotherapy or in combination, including with severe DEE. The patients responding to VPA carry variants that mainly cluster in 2 regions. One is the intracellular N-terminal part including the variants (T32A, D128E, D144E) and the other one the extracellular region of the third and fourth domain including the variants V330M, S333T, and R351K. VPA is an antiepileptic drug with a broad spectrum of mechanisms of action. VPA has been demonstrated to limit high-frequency repetitive firing in cultured neurons.21 This effect is linked to the modulation of sodium, calcium, and potassium channels, especially with a use-dependent decrease in inward sodium currents. VPA increases the amplitude of the late potassium outward currents, further increasing the threshold for epileptiform activity,21 which might explain the special effect of this drug in our cohort. However, the cohort is small and further studies are needed to prove this hypothesis.
KCNC2 has previously been proposed as a modifying factor17 and to play a role in other neuropsychiatric diseases such as ataxia,22,23 schizophrenia,24 bipolar disorder,25 and other DEEs.26 Our patients also displayed additional neurologic features including facial dysmorphism, ataxia, speech disturbance, depression, hyperactivity, and autism spectrum disorder, with additional support to this hypothesis. We could demonstrate a much broader clinical spectrum including GGE, EOAE, FE, and MAE.
The virtual structure of KV3.2 identified very important regions characterized by paralog conservation (Paraz score) and depletion of population variants (MTR score). We could not find a strong phenotype–structure association but the variants of our patients were concentrated at the C-terminus, N-terminus, and transmembrane segments 3 to 6, indicating high relevance of these regions to channel function.
We selected 4 variants for functional analysis based on the phenotype as well as the location within the channel. The functional results demonstrated a gain of function in the more severe phenotypes DEE and EOAE, whereas in the GGE-associated variant, a dramatic loss-of-function effect was observed. Among all KV channels, channels of the KV3 family in particular play a crucial role in the rapid repolarization of action potentials and therefore dictate action potential duration. The KV3.2 subunit is predominantly expressed in the brain specifically in parvalbumin-expressing GABAergic interneurons in neocortex as well as somatostatin-expressing GABAergic interneurons in deep cortical layers5,27 and therefore may be responsible for the modulation of excitation. Furthermore, functional analysis demonstrated that voltage-gated potassium channels are important for the regulation of firing, action potential duration, and neurotransmitter release.5,6 The KV3.2 subunit and the Kv3 family in general have some unusual electrophysiologic properties compared with other potassium channels such as the fast rate of deactivation upon repolarization. This rate is significantly faster than that of any other known neuronal voltage-gated K+ channel. Thus, KV3.2 plays a crucial role in fast-spiking interneurons.28 It is therefore reasonable that the development of epileptic seizures in the cases described here may be due to impaired function of inhibitory interneurons. In many generalized epilepsies, inhibitory interneurons play an essential role, for example in Dravet syndrome and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, which are associated with pathogenic variants in SCN1A encoding the main Na+ channel in inhibitory neurons,29,-,31 or in progressive myoclonic epilepsy due to KCNC1 mutations.8
KV3.2−/− knockout mice presented with specific changes in their cortical EEG patterns and showed increased susceptibility to epileptic seizures.32 This emphasizes the importance of inhibitory interneurons being able to generate high-frequency firing so that balanced cortical operations can occur. As described for other variants in potassium channel genes associated with epilepsy,33 the recorded KV3.2 variants demonstrate gain- and loss-of-function effects.
KCNC2 is a novel and important gene for a broad spectrum of epilepsy syndromes with an intriguing phenotype–pathophysiology correlation.
Study Funding
The study received support through the German Research Foundation (HE5415/5-1 and HE5415/6-1 to I.H., WE4896/3-1 to Y.W., and KU 911/21-2 and KU 911/22-1 to W.S.K.) and the DFG/FNR INTER Research Unit FOR2715 (WE4896/4-1 and WE4896/4-2 to Y.W., HE5415/7-1 and HE5415/7-2 to I.H., INTER/DFG/17/11583046 to P.M., Le1030/16-2 to H.L.). N.S., T.B., D.L., P.M., and Y.W. were supported by the BMBF Treat-ION grant (01GM1907). I.H. was supported by The Hartwell Foundation through an Individual Biomedical Research Award. This work was also supported by the National Institute for Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (K02 NS112600), including support through the Center Without Walls on ion channel function in epilepsy (Channelopathy-Associated Research Center, U54 NS108874), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development through the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC) at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania (U54 HD086984), and by intramural funds of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia through the Epilepsy NeuroGenetics Initiative (ENGIN). Research reported in this publication was also supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH under Award UL1TR001878. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. This project was also supported in part by the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics (ITMAT) Transdisciplinary Program in Translational Medicine and Therapeutics at the Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania. The study also received support through the EuroEPINOMICS-Rare Epilepsy Syndrome (RES) Consortium as well as the Genomics Research and Innovation Network (GRIN). I.H. also received support through the International League Against Epilepsy. H.M. was supported by intramural funds of the Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel. P.Striano and F.Z. developed this work within the framework of the DINOGMI Department of Excellence of MIUR 2018–2022 (legge 232 del 2016). The DECODE-EE project (Health Research Call 2018, Tuscany Region) provided research funding to R.G. and A.V. H.K. and M.D. were supported by a research grant from Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under Grant 16/RC/3948 and co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund and by FutureNeuro industry partners. The effort was supported by “Ricerca Corrente” funding from the Italian Ministry of Health.
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the participants and their family members for taking part in the study; the Epi25 principal investigators, local staff from individual cohorts, and the patients with epilepsy who participated in the study; and the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute for supporting the genomic data generation efforts and control sample aggregation. The ITAUBG centre thanks Dr Pippucci for supervision in genetic data analysis, the Neurogenetics Laboratory staff (led by Prof. Carelli V), and all the physicians and nurses of the Epilepsy Centre from the Bellaria Hospital in Bologna. This work is part of the Centers for Common Disease Genomics (CCDG) program, funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). CCDG-funded Epi25 research activities at the Broad Institute, including genomic data generation in the Broad Genomics Platform, are supported by NHGRI grant UM1 HG008895 (PIs: Eric Lander, Stacey Gabriel, Mark Daly, Sekar Kathiresan). The Genome Sequencing Program efforts were also supported by NHGRI grant 5U01HG009088-02. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Appendix Authors

Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
↵* These authors contributed equally to this work.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.
This manuscript was prepublished in MedRxiv (doi: doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.21.21257099).
- Received May 31, 2021.
- Accepted in final form February 1, 2022.
- Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
References
- 1.↵World Health Organization. WHO Epilepsy: A Public Health Imperative. World Health Organization; 2019.
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- Butler A,
- Wei AG,
- Baker K,
- Salkoff L
- 5.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- Calhoun JD,
- Carvill GL
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- Pérez-Palma E,
- May P,
- Iqbal S, et al.
- 15.↵
- Traynelis J,
- Silk M,
- Wang Q, et al.
- 16.↵
- DeLano WL
- 17.↵
- Rademacher A,
- Schwarz N,
- Seiffert S, et al.
- 18.↵
- Rasmussen HB,
- Trimmer JS,
- Rasmussen HB,
- Trimmer JS
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- Gesche J,
- Hjalgrim H,
- Rubboli G,
- Beier CP
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- Roberts J,
- Koltzenburg M,
- Hanna MG,
- Stewart H
- 23.↵
- Maksemous N,
- Smith RA,
- Sutherland HG,
- Sampaio H,
- Griffiths LR
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- Stern S,
- Sarkar A,
- Stern T, et al.
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- Chow A,
- Erisir A,
- Farb C, et al.
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
- Ogiwara I,
- Miyamoto H,
- Morita N, et al
- 32.↵
- Lau D,
- Vega-Saenz de Miera EC,
- Contreras D, et al.
- 33.↵
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations A Clinical and Genetic Study
Dr. Robert Shapiro and Dr. Amynah Pradhan
Related Articles
- No related articles found.