This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) has been associated with poorer postsurgical seizure outcomes compared to other pathologies. FCD surgical series have been assembled on the basis of a histologic diagnosis, including patients with abnormal and normal preoperative MRI. However, in clinical workflow, patient selection for surgery is based on preoperative findings, including MRI. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to determine the rate and predictors of favorable seizure outcome after surgery for MRI-detected FCD.
Methods We devised our study protocol in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered the protocol with PROSPERO. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies of patients followed up for ≥12 months after resective surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy with MRI-detected FCD. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate the proportion of patients attaining a favorable outcome, defined as Engel class I, International League Against Epilepsy class 1 to 2, or seizure-free status. Meta-regression was performed to investigate sources of heterogeneity.
Results Our search identified 3,745 references. Of these, 35 studies (total of 1,353 patients) were included. Most studies (89%) followed up patients for ≥24 months after surgery. The overall postsurgical favorable outcome rate was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64–75). There was high interstudy heterogeneity. Favorable outcome was associated with complete resection of the FCD lesion (risk ratio [RR] 2.42 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55–3.76], p < 0.001) and location of the FCD lesion in the temporal lobe (RR 1.38 [95% CI 1.07–1.79], p = 0.013) but not lesion extent, intracranial EEG use, or FCD histologic type. The number of FCD histologic types included in the same study accounted for 7.6% of the observed heterogeneity.
Discussion Seventy percent of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and MRI features of FCD attain a favorable seizure outcome after resective surgery. Our findings can be incorporated into routine preoperative counseling and reinforce the importance of completely resecting the MRI-detected FCD when safe and feasible.
Glossary
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- ECoG=
- electrocorticography;
- FCD=
- focal cortical dysplasia;
- FLAIR=
- fluid-attenuated inversion recovery;
- ILAE=
- International League Against Epilepsy;
- NHLBI=
- National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute;
- PRISMA=
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses;
- RR=
- risk ratio;
- SEEG=
- stereo-EEG
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
- Received June 1, 2021.
- Accepted in final form November 8, 2021.
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.