Teaching NeuroImage: Pontine Owl-Eyes Lesions in a Case of Neuroborreliosis
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Brain MRI in a 65-year-old woman with headache, sensory ataxia, and tick exposure revealed leptomeningeal and cranial nerve enhancement and T2-hyperintense symmetrical pontine lesions resembling the “owl-eyes” sign, a radiologic finding described in ischemic or compressive myelopathy (Figure, A–C).1 CSF analysis revealed pleocytosis (163/µL) and intrathecal production of anti-Borrelia IgG (CSF/serum index 21, N < 2). Workup was negative for alternative causes. The patient fully recovered after 21 days of ceftriaxone (Figure, D–F).
MRI before (A–C) and 1 week after (D–F) antibiotic treatment: axial T2 (A and D), coronal FLAIR with gadolinium (B and E), axial T1 with gadolinium (C and F). Initial MRI reveals symmetrical ovoid T2-hyperintense, T1-hypointense pontine lesions, with local (C), leptomeningeal (B) and cranial nerves (not shown) contrast enhancement. Posttreatment MRI shows the absence of contrast enhancement in the lesions.
Radiologic findings in neuroborreliosis include signs of cranial neuritis, meningitis, or stroke.2 In patients presenting with symmetrical T2-hyperintense lesions of the pons, this case supports the inclusion of neuroborreliosis in the differential diagnosis.
Study Funding
The authors report no targeted funding.
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Appendix Authors

Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Teaching slides links.lww.com/WNL/B637
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.