This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives To investigate the relationship between baseline structural measurements of brain reserve and clinical progression in Parkinson disease (PD). To further provide a possible underlying mechanism for structural measurements of brain reserve in PD, we combined functional and transcriptional data and investigated their relationship with progression-associated patterns derived from structural measurements and longitudinal clinical scores.
Methods This longitudinal study collected data from June 2010 to March 2019 from 2 datasets. The Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) included controls and patients with newly diagnosed PD from 24 participating sites worldwide. Results were confirmed using data from the Huashan dataset (Shanghai, China), which included controls and patients with PD. Clinical symptoms were assessed with Movement Disorder Society–sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) scores and Schwab & England activities of daily living (ADL). Both datasets were followed up to 5 years. Linear mixed-effects (LME) models were performed to examine whether changes in clinical scores over time differed as a function of brain structural measurements at baseline.
Results A total of 389 patients with PD (n = 346, age 61.3 ± 10.03, 35% female, PPMI dataset; n = 43, age 59.4 ± 7.3, 38.7% female, Huashan dataset) with T1-MRI and follow-up clinical assessments were included in this study. Results of LME models revealed significant interactions between baseline structural measurements of subcortical regions and time on longitudinal deterioration of clinical scores (MDS-UPDRS Part II, absolute β > 0.27; total MDS-UPDRS scores, absolute β > 1.05; postural instability–gait difficulty (PIGD) score, absolute β > 0.03; Schwab & England ADL, absolute β > 0.59; all p < 0.05, false discovery rate corrected). The interaction of baseline structural measurements of subcortical regions and time on longitudinal deterioration of the PIGD score was replicated using data from Huashan Hospital. Furthermore, the β-coefficients of these interactions recapitulated the spatial distribution of dopaminergic, metabolic, and structural changes between patients with PD and normal controls and the spatial distribution of expression of the α-synuclein gene (SNCA).
Discussion Patients with PD with greater brain resources (that is, higher deformation-based morphometry values) had greater compensatory capacity, which was associated with slower rates of clinical progression. This knowledge could be used to stratify and monitor patients for clinical trials.
Glossary
- 11C-CFT=
- 2b-carbomethoxy-3b-(4-trimethylstannylphenyl) tropane;
- 18F-FDG=
- 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose;
- ADL=
- activities of daily living;
- AHBA=
- Allen Human Brain Atlas;
- BR=
- brain reserve;
- DBM=
- deformation-based morphometry;
- FDR=
- false discovery rate;
- GO=
- gene ontology;
- H&Y=
- Hoehn and Yahr;
- LME=
- linear mixed effects;
- MDS-UPDRS=
- Movement Disorder Society–sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale;
- NC=
- normal control;
- PAP=
- progression-associated pattern;
- PC=
- principal component;
- PD=
- Parkinsons disease;
- PIGD=
- postural instability and gait disorder;
- PPMI=
- Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative;
- SNc=
- substantia nigra pars compacta
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
↵* These authors contributed equally to the work
† These authors contributed equally to the work as co-senior authors.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Peter Hedera, MD, PhD.
- Received October 26, 2021.
- Accepted in final form April 19, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
