Teaching NeuroImage: Lower Limb Muscle Weakness Due to Intramedullary Spinal Cord Lipoma
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

A 24-year-old man presented with a 6-month history of weakness of the right lower limb, without upper extremity weakness. Spinal cord CT/MRI showed an extensive intramedullary lesion from C7 to T4, with classical radiologic features of lipoma (Figure). There was no spinal dysraphism. Subtotal resection of the lesion was performed. The pathology confirmed the diagnosis of lipoma. Postoperatively, the patient's motor function temporarily deteriorated. The symptoms improved after 2-month rehabilitation. Nondysraphic spinal intramedullary lipomas are extremely rare, constituting approximately <1% of all intraspinal tumors.1,2 MRI is the most sensitive imaging protocol; typical radiologic appearances can confirm diagnosis and avoid biopsy.
(A–C) T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and T2-weighted images showed an intramedullary homogeneous lesion extending from C7 to T4. (D) Postcontrast T1-weighted imaging showed no enhancement. (E) CT showed a fatty lesion (–131 HU). (F) Lipoma was consisted of mature adipocytes (H&E: 200×). (G and H) After the subtotal resection, MRI showed the residual lesion.
Study Funding
No targeted funding reported.
Disclosure
The authors report no relevant disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Acknowledgment
We all express our gratitude to the patient, who kindly gave consent for publishing this paper.
Appendix Authors

Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Roy Strowd III, MD, Med, MS.
- Received March 5, 2022.
- Accepted in final form July 11, 2022.
- Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
References
- 1.↵
- Srinivasan US,
- Raghunathan N,
- Radhi L
- 2.↵
- Meher SK,
- Tripathy LN,
- Jain H,
- Basu S
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. David E. Vaillancourt and Dr. Shannon Y. Chiu
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.