Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

December 06, 2022; 99 (23) Resident & Fellow Section

Child Neurology: Horner Syndrome in an Otherwise Well-Appearing Infant

View ORCID ProfileAndrew Silverman, Shannon Beres
First published September 21, 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000201377
Andrew Silverman
From the Department of Neurology (A.S., S.B.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Department of Ophthalmology (S.B.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew Silverman
Shannon Beres
From the Department of Neurology (A.S., S.B.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; and Department of Ophthalmology (S.B.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Child Neurology: Horner Syndrome in an Otherwise Well-Appearing Infant
Andrew Silverman, Shannon Beres
Neurology Dec 2022, 99 (23) 1053-1056; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201377

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
305

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

We report an exemplary case of acquired Horner syndrome secondary to neuroblastoma in infancy. The patient presented with ptosis, miosis, and heterochromia. In reviewing the patient's laboratory and imaging workup, we highlight key etiologic differences between the pediatric and adult populations. Other important teaching points included in the discussion are a review of sympathetic neuroanatomy and oculosympathetic paresis, the appropriate and evidence-based diagnostic workup in infants and children, and a review of pharmacologic testing using cocaine and apraclonidine drops.

Case Report

A 5-month-old girl with no medical history presented to our hospital for expedited workup of suspected acquired Horner syndrome. She was delivered vaginally at term with no perinatal complications, and there were no developmental concerns by her pediatrician. She developed right upper eyelid ptosis 4 weeks prior to admission, followed 2 weeks later by anisocoria, her right pupil appearing smaller than the left. There was no history of trauma or recent illness.

On admission, the infant was afebrile with normal vital signs for age. Her smile was symmetric, and she was playful, tracking the examiner in all directions with no misalignment. She was able to sit upright independently and support her weight when her postural reflex was tested. Most pertinently, she displayed right upper eyelid ptosis with reverse lower eyelid ptosis and anisocoria (right pupil 2 mm, left pupil 4 mm in bright light), which was more prominent in dim light (Figure, A). On close inspection, heterochromia was noted (her right iris appeared lighter than her left). The remainder of her physical examination was unremarkable. A complete blood count and metabolic panel were within normal limits.

Chest x-ray (CXR) demonstrated a well-defined mass abutting the right superior sulcus and right upper mediastinum (Figure, B). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and angiography (MRA) of the neck revealed an enhancing, diffusion-restricted right apical mass encircling portions of the right vertebral artery, in close contact with the right common carotid artery (Figure, C). MRI of the brain was normal. She underwent thoracoscopic biopsy of the mass 2 days after imaging (Figure, D). At this time, additional laboratory tests resulted significant for a normal urine vanillylmandelic acid-to-creatinine ratio and a slight elevation of homovanillic acid of 35 mg/g creatinine (ref <35). Surgical pathology ultimately confirmed a poorly differentiated neuroblastoma. Iodine 123 (123I) metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) uptake occurred at the primary mass, with no other evidence of disease. The tumor was unresectable because of vessel encasement, and it was considered symptomatic in its interruption of the oculosympathetic chain.

The patient began chemotherapy 10 days after presentation (per the Children's Oncology Group study ANBL0531). Repeat imaging of the tumor after 2 cycles of chemotherapy demonstrated >50% decrease in tumor volume, indicating no need for additional chemotherapy. After chemotherapy completion at age 9 months, there were no findings of MIBG-avid malignancy.

At the same age, the patient was assessed in neuro-ophthalmology clinic, where she was determined to have normal visual acuity without cranial neuropathy or ocular misalignment. Her right-sided Horner syndrome was unchanged from presentation. Amblyopia risk was considered low given that her pupil was not obstructed by her ptosis.

Discussion

Horner syndrome is a neurologic constellation of miosis, ptosis, and hemifacial anhidrosis. It is widely held that this phenomenon was discovered in 1869 by Swiss ophthalmologist Johann Horner, but French ophthalmologist Claude Bernard was first to identify the triad in animal studies in 1852. As a result, the condition is sometimes referred to as Bernard-Horner syndrome in French literature.1 Regardless of eponymous legacy, the syndrome represents an oculosympathetic paresis, which is perhaps a more apt nomenclature.

Before discussing etiologies, we will highlight a few points on physical examination and neuroanatomy. First, as our patient demonstrated, the degree of anisocoria is more pronounced in scotopic (dim) rather than photopic (light) conditions. In addition, the Horner pupil tends to redilate more slowly than the normal pupil. Ptosis is usually minor (<2 mm) because of paralysis from sympathetic denervation of the superior and inferior tarsal muscles (superior tarsal muscle is also known as Müller muscle), affecting both the upper and lower eyelid, while the levator palpebrae superioris is unaffected. Weakness of the latter produces a more profound ptosis that can be observed in third nerve palsies. The rudimentary inferior tarsal muscle has no compensatory voluntary muscle as with the upper eyelid. Inferior tarsal paresis leads to a lower lid rise referred to as reverse lower eyelid ptosis, inverse ptosis, or upside-down ptosis. Regarding anhidrosis, the sympathetic fibers responsible for facial sweating and vasodilation branch at the superior cervical ganglion along the external carotid artery, so this sign is only associated with first-order or second-order lesions. Anhidrosis is not always apparent and indeed was not appreciated in our patient. In infants and children, impaired facial flushing (Harlequin sign) is frequently more apparent than anhidrosis. Finally, a congenital Horner syndrome may be suspected when anisocoria is seen with heterochromia (unequal iris colors where the affected iris is lighter) because the pigmented melanocytes in the superficial stroma of the iris are under sympathetic control in the first months of life.2,3 Our patient's heterochromia suggests that her tumor disrupted the oculosympathetic chain in this developmental period.

The differential diagnosis for Horner syndrome differs between children and adults, but in both populations, the syndrome can result from a lesion anywhere along a three-neuron sympathetic pathway originating in the hypothalamus. To review, the first-order neuron descends from the hypothalamus to synapse at C8-T2, the ciliospinal center of Budge. The second-order neuron exits in the anterior spinal roots to ascend in the sympathetic trunk, traveling through the brachial plexus and over the apex of the lung. Its synaptic destination is the superior cervical ganglion, located near the angle of mandible and the carotid artery bifurcation. The third-order neuron ascends within the internal carotid artery adventitia through the cavernous sinus, where it is in close relation to the abducens nerve. It then joins the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve (V1) to enter the orbit, where it finally innervates the iris dilator as well as the superior and inferior tarsal muscles. The tarsal muscles are small smooth muscles in the eyelid, responsible for a minor portion of upper lid elevation and lower lid retraction.2,3

The incidence of childhood Horner syndrome in a 6.5-year period in Northern Ireland was at least 2.54 per 100,000.4 This estimate contrasts with a population-based study in Minnesota, in which the calculated incidence of pediatric cases was 1.42 per 100,000 over a 40-year period.5

Adult etiologies include stroke (e.g., Wallenberg syndrome), dissection, aneurysm, tumor, demyelination, and cluster headache.3 By contrast, a retrospective study of 73 pediatric patients with oculosympathetic paresis found that 42.5% were congenital (including birth trauma), 42.5% were related to surgery, and 15% were acquired from etiologies such as neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, trauma, brainstem vascular malformation, and disseminated demyelinating sclerosis, with some causes undetermined.6 The rate of neuroblastoma in the aforementioned study from Northern Ireland was 20%, whereas a recent systematic review found a rate of 7.9%.7

Given that Horner syndrome can be a heralding sign of malignant and life-threatening conditions, neuroimaging is always warranted in Horner syndrome with unknown etiology in the first year of life and any acquired Horner syndrome thereafter. Accordingly, in the absence of a clear history of birth trauma or perinatal neck surgery, as in our case presentation, an acquired Horner syndrome prompts evaluation for tumor, particularly neuroblastoma. Urgent imaging studies should include MRI of the brain, neck, and chest, as well as MRA of the neck and chest. Measurement of urinary catecholamines should be acquired. Obtaining these catecholamine levels is a noninvasive and low-cost investigation. However, as partly seen in our patient, urinary catecholamine levels may be normal in some neuroblastoma cases and, therefore, should not entirely deter the decision to obtain imaging.7

It is important to acknowledge that there are no consensus guidelines for investigating an isolated pediatric Horner syndrome, but clinical judgment and examination should tailor the diagnostic evaluation.7,8 For example, associated abducens palsy may aid in localizing pathology to the cavernous sinus. Similarly, pain and/or recent trauma might suggest carotid dissection, which necessitates vessel imaging. At our hospital, we include vessel imaging because even minor head trauma, which might go unreported or unnoticed by caregivers, can lead to dissection and possibly ischemic stroke. While precise workup and imaging recommendations remain controversial, most authorities agree that MRI is preferred to computed tomography (CT) and that the anatomical coverage should at least include the brain, neck, and upper chest. Others advocate for extension to visualize the abdomen and/or pelvis as well.8

Pharmacologic testing for Horner syndrome diagnosis is warranted in uncertain cases, for example, in patients with unilateral miosis without associated findings such as ptosis or heterochromia. Such testing can differentiate a true Horner syndrome from pseudo-Horner syndrome due to benign physiologic anisocoria with mild eyelid asymmetry or aponeurotic ptosis.9 When available, cocaine or apraclonidine drops are useful (Table). In our patient, a clinical diagnosis of Horner syndrome was made given the presence of the expected ptosis, anisocoria, and heterochromia, substantiating the diagnosis of a true Horner syndrome, and pharmacologic testing was deferred.3,4,10

In summary, our patient demonstrates an exemplary case of acquired pediatric Horner syndrome secondary to neuroblastoma. Key teaching points include a review of sympathetic neuroanatomy and oculosympathetic paresis, the different etiologies in children vs adults, and the appropriate diagnostic workup in infants. At age 16 months, while our patient's Horner syndrome is unchanged, her neuroblastoma remains in remission.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 Patient Presentation and Diagnostic Workup

(A) Right-sided ptosis, miosis, and heterochromia on hospital admission. (B) CXR. Well-defined 2-cm mass abutting the right superior sulcus and right upper mediastinum that could be either pleural-based, pulmonary, or mediastinal in origin. (C) MRI/MRA neck. Avidly enhancing diffusion restricted right apical mass (approximately 3.2 × 2.1 × 2.9 cm), encircling portions of the right vertebral artery and in close contact with the right common carotid artery with associated regional right lower neck lymphadenopathy. Findings were compatible with a malignant process, most likely neuroblastoma. (D) Thorascopic view of apical mass before biopsy. Per operative note documentation, an exophytic mass covered with pleura was identified at the right apex, intimately involved with the sympathetic chain. The lesion was scored to open the pleura. The surgeon then used scissors to obtain a biopsy that was ultimately consistent with neuroblastoma.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Comparison of Cocaine and Apraclonidine Drops for Confirming Horner Syndrome3,4,10

Study Funding

The authors report no targeted funding.

Disclosure

The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.

Appendix Authors

Table

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

  • Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Whitley Aamodt, MD, MPH.

  • Received February 27, 2022.
  • Accepted in final form August 23, 2022.
  • © 2022 American Academy of Neurology

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Proctor C,
    2. Chavis PS
    . Horner syndrome. J Neuroophthalmol. 2013;33(1):88-89. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e318270ab95
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sauer C,
    2. Levingohn MW
    . Horner's syndrome in childhood. Neurology. 1976;26(3):216-220. doi: 10.1212/wnl.26.3.216. PMID: 943049
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Martin TJ
    . Horner syndrome: a clinical review. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2018;9(2):177-186. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00405
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nutt R,
    2. McLoone E,
    3. George S,
    4. O'Gallagher M
    . Atypical Horner's syndrome: frequency, features and aetiology in a paediatric population. Eye (Lond). 2021;35:811PMC8027383-. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0967-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Smith SJ,
    2. Diehl N,
    3. Leavitt JA,
    4. Mohney BG
    . Incidence of pediatric Horner syndrome and the risk of neuroblastoma: a population-based study. Arch Ophthalmo. 2010. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jeffery AR,
    2. Ellis FJ,
    3. Repka MX,
    4. Buncic JR
    . Pediatric horner syndrome. J AAPOS. 1998;2(3):159-167. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(98)90008-8. PMID: 10532753
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Braungart S,
    2. Craigie RJ,
    3. Farrelly P,
    4. Losty PD
    . Paediatric Horner's syndrome: is investigation for underlying malignancy always required?Epub 2019 Jun 11. Erratum in. Arch Dis Childarch Dis Child. 20192020;104105(103):984e4–987. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317007
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Khalatbari H,
    2. Ishak GE
    . Imaging of Horner syndrome in pediatrics: association with neuroblastoma. Pediatr Radiol. 2021;51(2):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04796-w
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Thompson BM,
    2. Corbett JJ,
    3. Kline LB,
    4. Thompson HS
    . Pseudo-Horner's syndrome. Arch Neurol. 1982;39(2):108-111. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1982.00510140042011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Martin GC,
    2. Aymard PA,
    3. Denier C, et al
    . Usefulness of cocaine drops in investigating infant anisocoria. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017;21(6):852-857. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.07.020
    OpenUrlCrossRef

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Study Funding
    • Disclosure
    • Appendix Authors
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations A Clinical and Genetic Study

Dr. Robert Shapiro and Dr. Amynah Pradhan

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All Oncology
  • All Pediatric
  • All Neuro-ophthalmology
  • Clinical neurology examination

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 100 (5)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise