Evolution of Prodromal REM Sleep Behavior Disorder to Neurodegeneration: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Case-control Study
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Background and Objectives: Individuals with a history of recurrent dream-enactment behaviors, but with subthreshold REM sleep without atonia levels for REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) diagnosis, are currently classified to have prodromal RBD (pRBD). However, the REM sleep elevated EMG diagnostic cut-off, progression trajectory, and long-term neurodegenerative outcome of pRBD are not well understood. This study aimed to delineate the evolution of REM sleep EMG levels, determine the EMG cut-off score for diagnosing pRBD, and examine the risk for neurodegenerative diseases of pRBD.
Methods: This retrospective longitudinal case-control study recruited pRBD patients and age, sex, and follow-up duration matched controls who were free of neurodegenerative disease at baseline in the Sleep Assessment Unit, the Chinese University of Hong Kong from 1997 to 2018. Patients and controls underwent clinical and video-polysomnography assessments at baseline and follow-up(s). REM sleep EMG activity level on mentalis and anterior tibialis (AT) muscles on video-polysomnography at each visit was scored. The diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases was confirmed by a neurologist.
Results: 44 patients (67.4 ± 8.2 years old, 6 females) and 44 controls were recruited. The combined REM sleep EMG level on mentalis and AT muscles of pRBD patients significantly increased during 8.2 ± 3.3 years of follow-up (from 19.3 ± 9.7% to 47.3 ± 27.4% with estimated annual increase of 3.9%), yielding 29 pRBD patients (66%) meeting the full-blown RBD diagnostic criteria. Baseline REM sleep mentalis and AT muscles EMG activity of patients who developed full-blown RBD could favourably differentiate pRBD from controls (6.3% for mentalis ‘any’ and 9.1% for combination of mentalis ‘any’ and bilateral AT muscles phasic EMG with AUC of 0.88 [0.78-0.98] and 0.97 [0.92-1.00] respectively). pRBD patients had a higher risk for neurodegenerative diseases (9 developed Parkinson’s disease and 3 developed dementia with Lewy bodies) when compared to controls (5 developed Alzheimer’s disease, adjusted hazard ratio = 2.95, 95% CI = 1.02-8.54).
Conclusions: pRBD has a predictive progression in both pathophysiology and neurodegenerative outcome. This finding has significant implications to the nosological status of pRBD, the current REM sleep-related EMG diagnostic criteria, spectrum concept of RBD and future neuroprotective intervention.
Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that EMG activity during REM sleep predicts the development of prodromal REM sleep behavior disorder.
- Received August 5, 2021.
- Accepted in final form March 24, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.