Future of Neurology & Technology: Neuroimaging Made Accessible Using Low-Field, Portable MRI
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
In the 20th century, the advent of neuroimaging dramatically altered the field of neurological care. However, despite iterative advances since the invention of Computerized Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), little progress has been made to bring MR neuroimaging to the point-of-care. Recently, the emergence of a low-field (LF) (<1 Tesla (T)), portable MRI (pMRI) is setting the stage to revolutionize the landscape of accessible neuroimaging. Users can transport the pMRI into a variety of locations, using a standard 110-220V wall outlet. In this article, we discuss current applications for pMRI including in the acute and critical care settings, as well as the barriers to broad implementation, and future opportunities.
Background
In 1971, the development of CT transformed neuroimaging. For the first time, the brain could be visualized noninvasively1. MRI further revolutionized the field by coupling an external magnetic field with radiofrequency (RF) energy to provide greater soft tissue contrast and more precise anatomic visualization than CT2,3. However, conventional MRI (cMRI) scanners operate at a high magnetic field strength (1.5-3 T), are costly to purchase ($1M per T), and require expensive infrastructure4. Patients must be moved from clinical environments to controlled access remote imaging suites, often causing delays in image acquisition. This transport is associated with cardiovascular and respiratory risks, which are exacerbated by the inability to deploy interventions in transit5, 6. While use of portable CT (pCT) can evade these hazards, it carries the risk of radiation7. Thus, the ability to obtain MR neuroimaging at the point-of-care may reshape neurological care (Figure).
For more information on pMRI background, please refer to eAppendix 1, which includes a discussion comparing pMRI versus cMRI and pCT and an explanation of pMRI specifications. eAppendix 1 also involves a clinical case highlighting pMRI’s utility and a description of similar devices.
- Received June 2, 2022.
- Accepted in final form January 4, 2023.
- © 2023 American Academy of Neurology
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Jeffrey Allen and Dr. Nicholas Purcell
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.