Functional Outcomes and Mortality in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intensive Medical and Surgical Support
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Background and Objectives: Despite decades of increasingly sophisticated neurocritical care, patient outcomes after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remain dismal. Whether this reflects therapeutic nihilism, or the effects of the primary injury has been questioned. In this contemporary cohort, we determined the 30- and 90-day mortality, cause-specific mortality, functional outcome, and the effect of surgical intervention in a culture of aggressive medical and surgical support.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with spontaneous ICH admitted to a tertiary neurocritical care unit. Patients with secondary ICH and those subject to limitation-of-care before 72-hours were excluded. For each ICH score, 30- and 90-day mortality, and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were examined. The effect of craniotomy/craniectomy ± hematoma evacuation on the outcome of supratentorial ICH was determined using propensity score matching. Median patient follow-up after discharge was 2.2 [IQR, 0.4-4.4] years.
Results: Among 319 patients with spontaneous ICH (median age was 69 [IQR, 60-77] years, 60% male), 30- and 90-day mortality were 16% and 22%, respectively, and unfavorable functional outcome (mRS 4-6) was 50% at a median 3.1-months after ICH. Admission predictors of mortality mirrored those of the original ICH score. Unfavorable outcomes for ICH score 3 and 4 were 73% and 86%, respectively. The most common adjudicated primary causes of mortality were direct effect or progression of the ICH (54%), refractory cerebral edema (21%), and medical complications (11%). In matched analyses, lifesaving surgery for supratentorial ICH did not significantly alter mortality or unfavorable functional outcome in patients overall. In subgroup analyses restricted to (1) surgery with hematoma evacuation, and (2) ICH score 3 and 4 patients, the odds of 30-day mortality were reduced by 71% (OR, 0.29, 95% CI, 0.09-0.9, p=0.032) and 80% (OR, 0.2, 95% CI, 0.04-0.91, p=0.038), respectively, but no difference was observed for 90-day mortality or unfavorable functional outcome.
Discussion: This study demonstrates that poor outcomes after ICH prevail despite aggressive treatment. Unfavorable outcomes appear related to direct effects of the primary injury and not to premature care limitations. Lifesaving surgery for supratentorial lesions delayed mortality but did not alter functional outcomes.
- Received July 17, 2022.
- Accepted in final form January 17, 2023.
- © 2023 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Jeffrey Allen and Dr. Nicholas Purcell
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.