Abstract
Background and Objectives: Ischemic stroke despite direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is increasingly common and portends high risk of subsequent ischemic stroke. Efficacy and safety of antithrombotic regimens following the condition are unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with ischemic stroke despite DOAC with and without an alternative antithrombotic regimen, and determine the risk factors of recurrent ischemic stroke while on anticoagulation.
Methods: In a population-based, propensity-score weighted, retrospective cohort study, we compared the clinical outcomes of DOAC-to-warfarin switch, DOAC-to-DOAC switch (DOACswitch) or addition of antiplatelet agents, with unchanged DOAC regimen (DOACsame) among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients who developed the first ischemic stroke despite DOAC from 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2020 in Hong Kong. Primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage, acute coronary syndrome and death. We performed competing risk regression analyses to compare the clinical endpoints, and determined the predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke in an unweighted multivariable logistic regression model.
Results: During the 6-year study period, among 45,946 AF patients on DOAC as stroke prophylaxis, 2,908 patients developed ischemic stroke despite DOAC. 2,337 NVAF patients were included in the final analyses. Compared to DOACsame, warfarin (aHR 1.96, 95%CI 1.27-3.02, p=0.002) and DOACswitch (aHR 1.62, 95%CI 1.25-2.11, p-value <0.001) were associated with increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. In DOACsame group, adjunctive antiplatelet agent was not associated with reduced risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. Diabetes mellitus, concurrent cytochrome P450/P-glycoprotein (CYP/P-gp) modulators and large artery atherosclerotic disease (LAD) were predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke.
Discussion: In NVAF patients with ischemic stroke despite DOAC, the increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke with switching to warfarin called for caution against such practice, while the increased ischemic stroke with DOAC-to-DOAC switch demands further studies. Adjunctive antiplatelet agent did not appear to reduce ischemic stroke relapse. As diabetes mellitus, use of CYP/P-gp modulators and LAD were predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke, further investigations should evaluate if strict glycemic control, DOAC level monitoring and routine screening for carotid and intracranial atherosclerosis may reduce ischemic stroke recurrence in these patients.
Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation suffering an ischemic stroke while being treated with a DOAC, continuing treatment with that DOAC is more effective at preventing recurrent ischemic stroke than switching to a different DOAC or to warfarin.
- Received December 20, 2022.
- Accepted in final form April 3, 2023.
- Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
