RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Confidentiality in preclinical Alzheimer disease studies
JF Neurology
JO Neurology
FD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
SP 725
OP 729
DO 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000153
VO 82
IS 8
A1 Jalayne J. Arias
A1 Jason Karlawish
YR 2014
UL http://n.neurology.org/content/82/8/725.abstract
AB Clinical trials to advance the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) may expose research subjects to discrimination risks. An individual enrolled in a research study that uses positive test results from amyloid PET imaging or CSF measures of β-amyloid 42 as inclusion criteria has biomarkers indicative of AD pathology. If insurers and employers learn this information, it could expose subjects to discrimination. Unfortunately, current legal and regulatory mechanisms are not sufficient to protect against harms that have significant consequences for subjects. Existing law that prohibits employment and insurance discrimination based on genetic status does not apply to amyloid biomarkers or any other biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Gaps in legal protections fail to protect research subjects from discrimination by long-term care and disability insurers. This risk is particularly concerning because individuals with AD dementia ultimately need long-term care services. To maximize subject protections and advance valuable research, policymakers, investigators, and research institutions must address shortcomings in the design of the electronic medical record, revise laws to limit discrimination, and develop practices that inform research participants of risks associated with loss of confidentiality.ACA=Affordable Care Act; AD=Alzheimer disease; ADA=Americans with Disabilities Act; AE=adverse event; CLASS=Community Living Assistance Services and Supports; EMR=electronic medical record; GINA=Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; HIPAA=Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act